References
- Cacciatore G, Alvetro L, Defraia E, Ghislanzoni LT, Franchi L. Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:136-42. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.3.136
- Han S, Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim JY, Kim KH. Longterm pharyngeal airway changes after bionator treatment in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusions. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:13-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.1.13
- Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:599.e1-12; discussion e1-6.
- Davidenko N. Silhouetted face profiles: a new methodology for face perception research. J Vis 2007;7:6.
- Singh GD, Clark WJ. Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated using Twin Block appliances: finite-element scaling analysis. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:225-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.3.225
- Baysal A, Uysal T. Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:71-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq187
- Baysal A, Uysal T. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:164-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt013
- Quintao C, Helena I, Brunharo VP, Menezes RC, Almeida MA. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji067
- Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985;88:242-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(85)90219-2
- Barton S, Cook PA. Predicting functional appliance treatment outcome in Class II malocclusions--a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112:282-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70257-9
- Caldwell S, Cook P. Predicting the outcome of twin block functional appliance treatment: a prospective study. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:533-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.5.533
- Franchi L, Baccetti T. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2006;76:950-4. https://doi.org/10.2319/110205-385
- Toureno L, Kook YA, Bayome M, Park JH. The effect of western adaptation of Hispanic-Americans on their assessment of Korean facial profiles Korean J Orthod 2014;44:28-35. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.1.28
- Patel HP, Moseley HC, Noar JH. Cephalometric determinants of successful functional appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 2002;72:410-7.
- Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969;55:585-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90036-0
- Tulley WJ. The scope and limitations of treatment with the activator. Am J Orthod 1972;61:562-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90107-8
- Pancherz H. The mandibular plane angle in activator treatment. Angle Orthod 1979;49:11-20.
- Ahlgren J, Laurin C. Late results of activatortreatment: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod 1976;3:181-7. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.3.3.181
- Parkhouse RC. A cephalometric appraisal of cases of Angle's Class II, Division I malocclusion treated by the Andresen appliance. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1969;19:425-33.
- Sharma AA, Lee RT. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twinblock and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:473-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.027
- Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70232-X
- Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:153-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81005-4
- Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012;30:218-26. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.105014
- O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Appelbe P, Davies L, Connolly I, et al. Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:573-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.042
Cited by
- Distribution of Various Maxilla-Mandibular Positions and Cephalometric Comparison in Chinese Skeletal Class II Malocclusions vol.21, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2897
- Cephalometric predictors for optimal soft tissue profile outcome in adult Asian class I subjects treated via extraction and non-extraction. A retrospective study vol.19, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.08.002