디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제15권11호
  • /
  • Pages.113-120
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

거시경제적사건과 기업의 투자부동산 보유간의 관련성 분석 -금융위기에 코스피기업과 코스닥기업의 비교를 중심으로-

A Study on Relations of Macroeconomic Events and Investment Real Estate Holdings of Corporate -Including comparisons of KOSPI and KOSDAQ Listed Companies in Financial Crisis-

  • Lee, Chan-ho (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.10.01
  • 심사 : 2017.11.20
  • 발행 : 2017.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 금융위기를 전후하여 기업이 보유한 부동산 중 업무용부동산과 투자부동산의 보유비중이 어떻게 변화되었는지를 분석하고, 이 부동산의 보유비중이 금융위기를 전후하여 코스피기업과 코스닥기업간에 차이가 있는지 여부를 분석하였다. 코스피기업의 경우 투자부동산은 개략적으로 증가하고 업무용부동산은 개략적으로 감소하였다. 코스닥 기업의 경우 금융위기 중의 투자부동산을 제외하고 코스피기업과 유사하였다. 평균차이분석을 이용하여 코스피기업과 코스닥기업을 비교해보면, 금융위기 직전에는 코스피기업의 보유부동산비중이 코스닥기업의 보유부동산비중 보다 투자와 업무용 모두 낮았으나, 금융위기 중 구간에는 코스피기업의 업무용부동산비중이 코스닥기업의 업무용부동산비중 보다 높아졌으며, 금융위기 직후 구간과 최근 구간까지는 코스피기업의 투자부동산비중이 코스닥기업의 투자부동산비중 보다 높게 유지되고 있었다. 본 연구는 금융위기 전후의 업무용부동산과 투자부동산의 변화 현상을 파악하는 목적이며, 이 분석결과를 토대로 경영성과와의 관련성 파악을 향후연구과제로 남긴다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze how the relative proportion of retention between real estate for business and investment real estate among the real estate held by corporations has been changed after and before the Financial Crisis as well as whether there has been any difference between KOSPI and KOSDAQ listed companies in terms of their share of the real estate. The increasing pattern of real estate owned by KOSDAQ were similar to the KOSPI companies except for investment properties during the Financial Crisis. The proportion of real estate owned by KOSPI had been lower than that of KOSDAQ companies in both investment and business real estate before the Financial Crisis. However, during the period of the Financial Crisis, the proportion of real estate for business held by KOSPI firms was higher than that of KOSDAQ firms. Furthermore, the portion of investment of real estate owned by KOSPI has remained higher than that of KOSDAQ after the Financial Crisis period and the recent period. Based on the results of this analysis, how the relevance of the change of portion between real estate for business and investment real estate affects management performance will be figured out in the future studies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Min-Che Kim, "A Study on the Effect of Corporate Real Estate Policy and Corporate Governance on Firm Value", Ph.D. dissertation, pp.1-154, Changwon National University, 2015.
  2. H. Y. Lee, M. H. Cho, "An Empirical Study on the Influence of the Possession and Investment Estate on the Value of Firm", Korean Corporation Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp.67-81, 2009.
  3. Won-Cheol Kang, "Corporate Real Estate and Corporate Value", Ph.D. dissertation, pp.1-101, Konkuk University, 2016.
  4. J. S. Kim, J. H. Choi, "A Study on the Effects of the Corporate Real Estate Aquisition and Sale on the Stock Return", Korean Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 18, No.1, pp.283-332, 1995.
  5. Constand, R., Lewis M., Sullivan J., "Factors Affecting Price Earnings Ratios and Market Value of Japanese Firms", Financial Management", Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.68-79, 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665713
  6. J. S. Kang, H. T. Sim, "The Effect of Real Estate Holdings on Price to Book Value Ratio", Tax Accounting Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.361-384, 1998.
  7. Ambrose, W. B., "Corporate Real Estate's Impact on the Takeover Market", Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 3, pp.307-322, 1990.
  8. Ambrose, W. B., Megginson W. L., "The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition Likelihood", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp.575-589, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331141
  9. Brounen, D., van Dijk, M., Eichholtz, P., "Corporate Real Estate and Corporate Takeovers: International Evidence", Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp.293-313, 2008.
  10. Brounen, D., Eichholtz, P., "Corporate Real Estate Ownership Implication", Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp.429-445, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-005-7015-5
  11. Brounen, D., Colliander, G., Eichholtz, P., "Corporate Real Estate and Stock Performance in the International Retail Sector", Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp.287-299, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010510651061
  12. Hwang, E. S., Seiler, V. L., Seiler, M. J., "Multinational Companies' Real Asset Ownership and its Impact on Diversification", Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp.326-338, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010510651070
  13. Williamson, O. E., "Managerial Discretion and Business Behavior", American Economic Review, Vol. 53, pp.1032-1067, 1963.
  14. M. C. Kim, D. W. Kim, B. G. Kim, "Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Real Estate Policy", Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 28 No. 25, pp.785-808, 2015.
  15. M. S. Shin, S. E. Kim, J. I. Lee, "Collateral Channel Effects of Corporate Asset Structure on Capital Structure", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp.85-109, 2016.