재활치료과학 (Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation)

  • 제6권2호
  • /
  • Pages.59-70
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2635-9340(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-4329(eISSN)
대한신경계작업치료학회 (Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

아동용 참여평가도구 한글판 Life Habits Assessment(LIFE-H 1.0)의 타당도 연구

A Study on Validity of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H 1.0) in Children

  • 우예신 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이예진 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김연주 (서울대학교병원 재활의학과 작업치료실) ;
  • 강재원 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박혜연 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Woo, Ye-Shin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Ye-Jin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Yeon-Ju (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, The Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kang, Jae-Won (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Hae Yean (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.31
  • 심사 : 2017.08.18
  • 발행 : 2017.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 아동 발달의 핵심적인 요소인 참여를 평가하고 참여의 특징을 이해하는 것은 아동의 치료목표를 설정하고 참여를 강화시키는데 중요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 아동용 참여평가도구 한글판 LIFE-H 1.0의 타당도를 검증하여 국내 작업치료사들이 아동의 참여를 체계적으로 평가할 수 있도록 하고자 한다. 연구방법: 본 연구는 장애 및 비장애 아동 총 47명을 대상으로 2016년 2월부터 4월까지 약 2개월간 진행되었다. 아동의 부모를 대상으로 0-4세와 5-13세 아동에 따라 문항이 다른 한글판 Life Habits Assessment(LIFE-H 1.0)를 자가 보고식 설문으로 진행하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS(Statistical Package for Social Science) 통계분석 프로그램을 이용하여 판별타당도를 검증하였다. 결과: 일반적 특성에 관한 동질성 검증에서는 두 집단 간 차이를 보이지 않았으며, 0-4세 및 5-13세로 나누어 장애 유무에 따른 두 집단 간 점수를 비교한 결과, LIFE-H 1.0 수행도 및 만족도의 총점에서 유의미한 차이(P<.05)가 발생하여 높은 판별타당도가 검증되었다. 결론: 한글판 LIFE-H 1.0은 장애 유무에 따른 참여의 차이를 분명하게 판별할 수 있는 참여평가도구다. 아동작업치료의 궁극적 목표는 신체 기능이나 능력 향상을 넘어 일상생활 및 사회에의 참여를 증진시키는 것이다. 따라서 작업치료사는 아동의 참여 수준을 정확히 평가하고 치료목표를 설정하여야 한다. 본 연구를 통해 높은 수준의 타당도가 검증된 만큼 작업치료 임상 현장과 연구에서 한글판 LIFE-H 1.0 평가도구가 널리 활용되기를 기대한다.

Objective: It is important to assess the participation and understand the characteristics of participation for setting goal of the child's treatment and strengthening participation. In this study, we verified the validity of the LIFE-H 1.0, so that domestic occupational therapists can systematically evaluate children's participation. Methods: This study was conducted for about 2 months from February to April 2016 in 47 children with disabilities and non-disabled children. We divided the children into two groups aged 0-4 years and 5-13 years old and conducted a self-report questionnaire to parents. The collected data were verified by SPSS(Statistical Package for Social Science) statistical analysis program. Results: There was no difference between the two groups in general characteristics. In comparison of two groups, a significant difference(p<.05) was found in the LIFE-H 1.0 total performance and satisfaction score and the high discriminant validity was verified. Conclusion: The ultimate goal of occupational therapy is to increase participation. Therefore, the occupational therapist must be able to assess the level of participation and than set the goal of intervention. This study confirms the high level of validity and expects that Korean version of LIFE-H 1.0 will be widely used in clinical field and research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bult, M. K., Verschuren, O., Jongmans, M. J., Lindeman, E., & Ketelaar, M. (2011). What influences participation in leisure activities of children and youth with physical disabilities? A systematic review, Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1521-1529.
  2. Calman, K. C. (1984). Quality of life in cancer patients-An hypothesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 10, 124-127. doi:10.1136/jme.10.3.124
  3. Choi, B. C. (2013). A critical review of the current health care and therapy services for disabled children. Korea Association for the Rights of Children with Disabilities, 4(1), 61-81.
  4. Engel-Yeger, B., Jarus, T., Anaby, D., & Law, M. (2009). Differences in patterns of participation between youths with cerebral palsy and typically developing peers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 96-104. doi:10. 5014/ajot.63.1.96 https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.63.1.96
  5. Eyssen, I. C., Steultjens, M. P., Dekker, J., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: Challenges in defining participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 983-997. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006
  6. Fougeyrollas, P. (1998). The quebec classification: Disability creation process. Quebec, Canada: International network on the Disability Creation Process.
  7. Fougeyrollas, P., Noreau, L., Bergeron, H., Cloutier, R., Dion, S. A., Michel, G. (1998). Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21(2), 127-142 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199806000-00002
  8. King, G. A., Baldwin, P. J., Currie, M., & Evans, J. (2005). Planning successful transitions from school to adult roles for youth with disabilities. Children's Health Care, 34(3), 195-216. doi:10.1207/s15326888chc3403_3
  9. Law, M. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 640-649. doi:10.5014/ajot. 56.6.640
  10. Law, M., & King, G. (2000). Participation! Every child's goal. Today's Kids in Motion, 1, 10-12.
  11. Lee, Y. J. (2016). A study on validity and reliability of the korean version life habits assessment(life-h 3.1) in older adults(Master's thesis). Yonsei University, Wonju.
  12. Lepage, C., Noreau. L., Bernard, P. M. (1998). Association between characteristics of locomotion and accomplishment of life habits in children with cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy, 78(5), 458-469. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/78.5.458
  13. Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Tribble, D. S. (2007). Comparing the disability creation process and international classification of functioning, disability and health models. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(3), 233-242. doi:10.1177/00084174070740S303
  14. Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., & Whiteneck, G. (2010). Accomplishment level and satisfaction with social participation of older adults: Association with quality of life and best correlates. Quality of Life Research, 19, 665-675. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9633-5
  15. Noreau, L., Lepage, C., Boissiere, L., Picard, R., Fougeyrollas, P., Mathieu, J., Desmarais, G., ... Nadeau, L. (2007). Measuring participation in children with disabilities using the assessment of life habits. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 666-671. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00666.x
  16. Poulin, V., & Desrosiers, J. (2009). Reliability of the life-h satisfaction scale and relationship between participation and satisfaction of older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 1311-1317. doi:10.1080/09638280802572957
  17. Simeonsson, R., Carlson, D., Huntington, G., McMillen, J., & Brent, J. (2001). Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382801750058134
  18. Trombly, C. (1993). Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 253-257. doi:10.5014/ajot.47.3.253
  19. World Health Organization. (2007). The international classification of functioning, disability and health : children & youth version: ICF-CY.
  20. World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Swtizerland: Author.