기술혁신학회지 (Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society)

  • 제20권3호
  • /
  • Pages.709-731
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-2912(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8666(eISSN)
한국기술혁신학회 (Korea Technology Innovation Society)
권호 표지

기술혁신역량의 개도국 전수를 위한 전략 연구: KIST사례를 중심으로

Transferring Innovation Capacities to Developing Countries: A KIST-based Strategy

  • 이창근 (한국과학기술연구원 인재개발실) ;
  • 김종주 (한국과학기술연구원) ;
  • 정선양 (건국대학교 기술경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2017.05.03
  • 심사 : 2017.07.31
  • 발행 : 2017.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

흡수역량(absorptive capacity)에 관한 활발한 연구에도 불구하고 선 후진국 간의 빈부격차는 심화되고 있으며, 일부 성공사례를 제외하면 개발도상국의 기술혁신 역량의 향상은 기대수준에 미치지 못하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 KIST 설립 사례를 분석하여 개발도상국 측의 흡수역량과 더불어 선진국 측의 새로운 역량이 필요함을 주장하고, 이를 '공유역량(transplanting capacity)'이라 명명 하였다. 기존 연구에서 밝혀진 흡수역량의 핵심요소, 즉 사전지식의 정도 및 노력의 강도에 대비되는 공유역량의 핵심요소로서 개발경험의 성문화(codification), 현지화(localization), 그리고 의지(committment)가 필요함을 제시하였다. 지구 온난화 및 감염성 질병 등 글로벌 이슈에 공동대처, IT기술의 발달 및 신생기술의 출현에 의한 개도국의 혁신 가능성 확대, 개도국 시장의 성장 가능성은 공유역량의 확보가 개도국지원 차원뿐만 아니라 선진국 자신을 위해서 반드시 갖추어야 할 역량임을 보여준다.

Great attention has been paid to absorptive capacity (AC) as a means of technological innovation. However, few developing countries have demonstrated real success in the development of their technologies and economies. Global issues such as climate change, contagious disease, etc. require more active cooperation between developing and developed countries. This paper makes the novel argument that the donor's transplanting capacity (TC) should be developed and coevolved in concert with the recipient country's AC. Review of the literature shows that AC depends on a prior knowledge base and an intensity of effort. In this article, we analysed the case of KIST and suggest that codification of development experience, localization of innovation capacity, and donor committment comprise the core elements of TC. Nonaka (1994) argued that interaction between tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge can synergize to increase the overall store of available knowledge. Development experience, which leans heavily toward tacit knowledge, should be transformed into explicit knowledge for more efficient technology diffusion. The technological environments of recipient countries vary from those of their donors, which is why innovation capacity should conform to local conditions in order to make transplantation smoother. Donor committment is also critical for successfully transmitting valuable experience.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김귀원 (2014), "학습, 혁신역량과 혁신성과 간의 관계에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 17(2): 380-420.
  2. 김인수 (2000), "한국의 경영학연구", 경영학연구, 29(3): 293-314.
  3. 문만용 (2006), "KIST 의 설립과 변천 1966-1980: 계약연구기관에서 국책연구기관으로", 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  4. 이달환 (1990), "정부출연연구소의 역할적응과 연구개발성과분석: KIST 의 연구 성과분석을 통한 실증적 연구", 한국과학기술원 박사학위 논문.
  5. 이창근 (2017), "개도국 공공연구기관 발전에 있어서 공유역량의 역할: KIST 사례를 중심으로", 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  6. 이창근.정선양 (2016), "해외과학자 유치방안에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 19(2): 95-415.
  7. 장용석 (2012), "신 과학기술외교 전략으로서의 패키지형 과학기술 ODA 모형", STEPI Insight, 86: 1-29.
  8. 정선양 (2016), 전략적 기술경영, 제4판, 서울: 박영사.
  9. 정선양 (2015), 우리나라의 글로벌 과학기술 리더십 확보방안, 한국과학기술한림원.
  10. 정선양 (2012), 기술과 경영, 제2판, 서울: 경문사.
  11. 정선양 (2011), "지속가능한 국가혁신체제를 찾아서", STSS 지속가능과학회 2011년 춘계 학술대회, 109-124.
  12. 조형례.정선양. (2015), "국가혁신역량과 제도의 질이 경제성장에 미치는 영향", 기술혁신연구, 23(4): 33-61. https://doi.org/10.14383/SIME.2015.23.4.33
  13. 차은주.성민경.박선경.강민지.신민경 (2014), "역량개발사업 동향 및 성과제고 방안", 국제개발협력, 2014(1): 125-137.
  14. 최형섭 (1995), 불이 꺼지지 않는 연구소, 조선일보사.
  15. 한국과학기술연구원 (2016), KIST 50년사, 서울 : 한국과학기술연구원.
  16. 한국과학기술연구원 (2015), V-KIST 설립기본계획수립보고서, 서울 : 한국과학기술연구원.
  17. 한국과학기술연구소 (1977), 한국과학기술연구소 10년사, 서울 : 한국과학기술연구소.
  18. 한국과학기술연구소 (1975), 한국과학기술연구소 비사 제11권.
  19. 한국국제협력단 (2012), "국제개발협력용어집", http://www.koica.go.kr/ (2017. 5. 1).
  20. 환력기념발간회 (1981), 과학기술과 더불어: 최형섭박사 환력기념 회상록.
  21. Moyo, D. (2012), 죽은원조, 알마출판사.
  22. Battelle Memorial Institute (1971), Report on Battelle's Assistance to the Korea Institute of Science and Technology.
  23. Chang, H. J. (2003), Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, Anthem Press.
  24. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990), "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  25. Cohendet, P. and Steinmueller, W. E. (2000), "The Codification of Knowledge: A Conceptual and Empirical Exploration", Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.195
  26. Ernst, D., Lee, H. and Kwak, J. (2014), "Standards, Innovation, and Latecomer Economic Development: Conceptual Issues and Policy Challenges", Telecommunications Policy, 38(10): 853-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.09.009
  27. Ernst, D. and Kim, L. (2002), "Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capability Formation", Research Policy, 31(8): 1417-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00072-0
  28. Grubel, H. (1968), "The Brain Drain: A U.S. Dilemma", Science, 154(3755): 1421.
  29. Hobday, M. (2011), "Learning from Asia's Success: Beyond Simplistic 'Lesson-making", Working Paper, World Institute for Development Economics Research, 2011: 140-152.
  30. Hornig, D. F. (1965), "Address Before Korean Chamber of Commerce by Dr. Donald F. Hornig" (July 9, 1965).
  31. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (2005), "Strategic Intent", Harvard Business Review, 83(7): 148-161.
  32. Hentges, H. A. (1975), The Repatriation and Utilization of High-level Manpower: A Case Study of the Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.
  33. Kim, L. (1999), Learning and Innovation in Economic Development, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  34. Kim, L. (1998), "Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-up at Hyundai Motor", Organization Science, 9(4): 506-521. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.4.506
  35. Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning, Harvard Business Press.
  36. Korea Institute of Science and Technology(KIST) (2015), The KIST Story, Seoul: KIST.
  37. Lee, B. G. (2016), "KIST at 50, Beyond the Miracle", Science, 351(6276): 895-895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5006
  38. Lee, K. (2005), "Making a Technological Catch‐up: Barriers and Opportunities", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2): 97-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2005.9668610
  39. Liao, S. H., Chang, W. J. and Wu, C. C. (2010), "An Integrated Model for Learning Organization with Strategic View: Benchmarking in the Knowledge-intensive Industry", Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5): 3792-3798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.041
  40. Lim, C., Han, S. and Ito, H. (2013), "Capability Building through Innovation for Unserved Lower End Mega Markets", Technovation, 33(12): 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.06.010
  41. Majidpour, M. (2016), "International Technology Transfer and the Dynamics of Complementarity: A New Approach", Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
  42. McMahon, D. and Thorsteinsdottir, H. (2013), "Pursuing Endogenous High-tech Innovation in Developing Countries: A Look at Regenerative Medicine Innovation in Brazil, China and India", Research Policy, 42(4): 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.003
  43. Nonaka, I. (1994), "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation", Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  44. Nonaka, I. and Von Krogh, G. (2009), "Perspective-Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory", Organization Science, 20(3): 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
  45. Peres, W. (2011), Industrial Policies in Latin America, Working Paper, 48.
  46. Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantages of Nations, NewYork: FreePress.
  47. Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  48. Prahalad, C. K. (2012), "Bottom of the Pyramid as a Source of Breakthrough Innovations", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1): 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00874.x
  49. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (2006), The Core Competence of the Corporation, 275-292), Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  50. Robertson, P. L., Casali, G. L. and Jacobson, D. (2012), "Managing Open Incremental Process Innovation: Absorptive Capacity and Distributed Learning" Research Policy, 41(5): 822-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.008
  51. Slowter, E. E. (1996), KIST: "The Buiding of a Laboratory, A Tale of Two Cultures"
  52. Song, S. S. (2011). "The Historical Development of Technological Capabilities in Korean Steel Industry: The Case of POSCO", 한국과학사학회지, 33(2): 317-334.
  53. Teece, D. J. (2009), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  54. Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2013), Managing Innovation, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  55. United States Government (1965), "Memorandum" (August 9, 1965).
  56. Van der Boor, P., Oliveira, P. and Veloso, F. (2014), "Users as Innovators in Developing Countries: The Global Sources of Innovation and Diffusion in Mobile Banking Services", Research Policy, 43(9): 1594-1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.003
  57. Yin, R. K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed., In United States: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.