DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Validation for Mapping of Gas Detectors at a BTX Plant

BTX 공정에서 Gas Detector Mapping 적정성 검토에 관한 연구

  • Seo, Ji Hye (Department of Environmental Technology & Safety Technology Convergence, Inha University) ;
  • Han, Man Hyoeng (Department of Environmental Technology & Safety Technology Convergence, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Il Kwon (Department of Environmental Technology & Safety Technology Convergence, Inha University) ;
  • Chon, Young Woo (Department of Environmental Technology & Safety Technology Convergence, Inha University)
  • 서지혜 (인하대학교 환경안전융합전공) ;
  • 한만형 (인하대학교 환경안전융합전공) ;
  • 김일권 (인하대학교 환경안전융합전공) ;
  • 천영우 (인하대학교 환경안전융합전공)
  • Received : 2017.08.30
  • Accepted : 2017.10.19
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

In order to prevent major and chemical accidents, some of the plants which would like to install and operate hazard chemicals handling facilities must submit Off-site Consequence Analysis due to recent arisen leak accidents since 2015. A lot of chemical industrials choose gas detectors as mitigation equipment to early detect gas vapor. The way of placement of gas detectors has two methods; Code-based Design(CBD) and Performance-based Design. The CBD has principles for gas detectors to be installed with consideration for the place that is expected to accumulate gas, and the leak locations according to legal standards and technical guidelines, and has a possibility to be unable to detect by these rules to locate gas detectors by vapor density information. The PBD has two methods; a Geographic Method and Scenario based Method. The Scenario-based Method has been suggested to make up for the Geographic Coverage Method. This Scenario-based Method draw the best optimum placement of gas detectors by considering leak locations, leak speed information, leak directions and etc. However, the domestic placement guidelines just refers to the CBD. Therefore, this study is to compare existing placement location of gas detectors by the domestic CBD with placement locations, coverages and the number of gas detectors in accordance with the Scenario-based Method. Also this study has measures for early detecting interest of Vapor Cloud and suitable placement of gas detectors to prevent chemical accidents. The Phast software was selected to simulate vapor cloud dispersion to predict the consequence. There are two cases; an accident hole size of leak(8 mm) from API which is the highst accident hole size less than 24.5 mm, and a normal leak hole size from KOSHA Guide (1.8 mm). Detect3D was also selected to locate gas detectors efficiently and compare CBD results and PBD results. Currently, domestic methods of gas detectors do not consider any risk, but just depend on domestic code methods which lead to placement of gas detectors not to make personnels recognize tolerable or intolerable risks. The results of the Scenario-based Method, however, analyze the leak estimated range by simulating leak dispersion, and then it is able to tell tolerable risks. Thus it is considered that individuals will be able to place gas detectors reasonably by making objectives and roles flexibly according to situations in a specific plant.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. S. Kim, "Exploring Fortune 500 Giant Enterprises", Global Economics, pp. 6, 2015.
  2. S. I. Jang et al., "The Method of Consequence Analysis of the Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion Accident by the Continous Release of Gas-Liquid Flow for the Small and Medium Size Enterprises(SMS)", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol 18, No.1, pp.64-70, 2003.
  3. J. H. Hwang, "The Study of Improvement of Domestic Safety Statute of Passive Fire Protection System and Passive Explosion Protection System on Petrochemical Plant", Pukyong National University, 2016.
  4. B. H. Ham, "Construction of Expert System for Hazard Assessment of Unconfined Vapor Cloud Explosion", Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 10, pp. 97-104, 1995.
  5. Ulsan Development Institute, "Risk Assessment and Firefighting Administration Measurement in the Petrochemical Industrial Complex", 2004.
  6. National Institute of Chemical Safety, "A Guidebook for Off-site Consequence Alanysis(II)", 2017.
  7. E. Mariotti, A. D. Padova, T. Barbaresi, F. Tallone, A. Tugnoli, G. Spadoni and V. Cozzani, "Deveopment of Improved Strategies for the Lay-out of Fire and Gas Detectors", Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol. 36, pp. 284, 2014.
  8. Scandpower As, "Evaluation of Gas Detection System on xx", 2008.
  9. R. Macleod, "The Importance of Mapping in Terms of Detecting Technologeis", 21C F.A visionary, 177, pp. 88-89, 2014.
  10. Korea Gas Corporation, "Gas Fire/Explosion and Large Capacity Part Test Equipment Design", 2015.
  11. Y. W. Hwang, Y. W. Chun and J. Y. Moon, "Guidelines for Engineering Design for Process Safety", Knowledge and Future, pp. 18-315, 2016.
  12. KOSHA, "Technical Guidance on Installation and Maintenance of Flammable Gas Detection and Alarm Devices", pp. 2, 2013.
  13. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, "Installation, Operation and Maintenance of Flammable", pp.2-3, 2013.
  14. KGS FP112, "Facility/Technical/Inspection/Supervision/Safety Assessment Code for Production of High-Pressure Gases", pp. 62, 2017.
  15. KGSFU111, "Facility/Technical/Inspection/Safety Assessment Code for Storage of High-Pressure Gases", pp. 62, 2017.
  16. KOSHA, "Toluene MSDS", 2017.
  17. KOSHA, "BTX Process", pp. 22, 2008.
  18. National Institute of Chemical Safety, "Technical Guideline for the Selection of Accident Scenarios", 2014.
  19. KOSHA, "Guidelines for Evaluations of Sources of Leakage of Flammable Material Leakage in Hazardous Locations of Explosive Gas(KOSHA E-151-2016)", 2016.
  20. National Institute of Chemical Safety, "Outlines for the Off-site Consequence Analysis", 2014.
  21. KOSHA, "Guidelines for the Measurement of the Loss Minization(KOSHA P-110-2012)", 2012.
  22. E. Miyata and S. Mori, "Optimization of Gas Detector Locations by Application of Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Tools", Sumitomo Chemisal Co., 2011.
  23. TongYang Industry, TYI-Safety Cover, 2015.