Environmental and Resource Economics Review (자원ㆍ환경경제연구)

Korean Resource Economics Association (한국자원경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Causal Relationship between Energy Consumption, Production and Export in Domestic Manufacturing Sector

국내 제조업부문의 에너지소비, 생산, 수출간의 인과관계 분석

  • Kim, Suyi (College of Business Management, Hongik University)
  • 김수이 (홍익대학교 상경대학 상경학부)
  • Received : 2017.01.04
  • Accepted : 2017.03.09
  • Published : 2017.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the mutual causal relationship between energy consumption, production, and export for manufacturing industry in Korea. The Korean manufacturing industry was divided into nine industries and panel data was constructed from 1991 to 2013. The panel Granger causality test method developed by Demitrescu and Hurlin (2012) was used along with the Vector Error Correction Model. This analysis showed that there was Granger Causality from production to energy consumption, from exports to energy consumption. However, Granger Causality was not established in the opposite direction. Therefore, this result supports the conservation hypothesis of Qzturk (2010) that energy-saving policies in the manufacturing sector can be implemented without adverse effects on production or exports in short-run. There is a long-run cointegrating relationship between production, energy consumption, exports, labor, and capital in the Korean manufacturing sector. Furthermore, the energy consumption contributes to the increasing of production in long-run equilibrium relationship.

본 연구에서는 우리나라의 제조업을 대상으로 에너지소비, 생산, 수출의 상호 인과관계를 분석하였다. 우리나라 제조업을 9개 산업으로 나누어 1991년부터 2013년까지 패널 데이터를 구축하여 VECM 방법론과 더불어 Demitrescu and Hurlin (2012)에 의해서 개발된 패널 Granger causality test 방법을 사용하였다. 분석결과에 의하면, 생산에서 에너지소비로, 수출에서 에너지소비로의 Granger Causality가 존재하였다. 하지만 그 역으로는 Granger Causality가 성립하지 않았다. 따라서 제조업부문의 에너지절약정책은 생산이나 수출에 역효과를 발생하지 않으면서 추진될 수 있다는 Qzturk (2010)의 보존가설을 지지하고 있다. 장기적으로는 생산, 에너지소비, 수출, 노동, 자본 간에 장기 공적분관계가 존재하며, 장기균형관계에서 에너지소비가 생산의 증가에 기여하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Apergis, N. and J. E. Payne, "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Central America: Evidence from a Panel Cointegration and Error Correction Model," Energy Economics, Vol. 31, 2009, pp. 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.09.002
  2. Apergis, N. and J. E. Payne, "Energy consumption and growth in South America: evidence from a panel error correction model," Energy Economics, Vol. 32, 2010, pp. 1421-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.006
  3. Chen, S., H. Kuo, and C. Chen, "The Relationship between GDP and Electricity Consumption in 10 Asian Countries," Energy Policy, Vol. 35, 2007, pp. 2611-2621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.001
  4. Dumitrescu, E.-I. and C. Hurlin, "Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogenous Panels," Economic Modelling, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  5. Edwards, S., "Openness, Productivity and Growth: What do Really Know?" Economic Journal, Vol 108, 1998, pp. 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00293
  6. Giles J. A. and C. L. Williams, "Export Led Growth; A Survey of the Empirical Literature and Some Non Causality Results: Part 1," Journal of International Trade and Economic development, Dev. 9, 2000a, pp. 261-337.
  7. Giles, J. A. and C. L. Williams, "Export Led Growth; A Survey of the Empirical Literature and Some Non Causality Results: Part 2," Journal of International Trade and Economic development, Dev. 9, 2000b, pp. 445-470.
  8. Lean, H. H. and R. Smyth, "Multivariate Granger Causality between Electricity Generation, Exports and GDP in Malaysia," Energy, Vol. 35, 2010a, pp. 3640-3648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.008
  9. Lean, H. H. and R. Smyth, "On the Dynamics of Aggregate Output, Electricity Consumption and Exports in Malaysia: Evidence from Multivariate Granger Causality Tests," Applied Energy, Vol. 87, 2010b, pp. 1963-1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.017
  10. Lee, C. C., "Energy Consumption and GDP in Developing Countries: A Cointegrated Panel Analysis," Energy Economics, Vol. 27, 2005, pp. 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2005.03.003
  11. Lee, C. C., and C. P. Chang, "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Asian Economies: A More Comprehensive Analysis Using Panel Data," Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 30, 2008, pp. 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.03.003
  12. Lee, C. C., C. P. Chang, and P. F. Chen, "Energy-income Causality in OECD Countries Revisited: The Key Role of Capital Stock," Energy Economics, Vol. 30, 2008, pp. 2359-2373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.01.005
  13. Lewer, J. J. and H. Van den Berg, "How Large is International Trade's Effect on Economic growth?" Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 17, 2003, pp. 363-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00198
  14. Maddala, G. S. and S. Wu, "A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, 1999, pp. 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.13
  15. Mahadevan, R. and J. Asafu-Adjaye, "Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Prices: A Reassessment Using Panel VECM for Developed and Developing Countries," Energy Policy, Vol. 35, 2007, pp. 2481-2490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.019
  16. Mehrara, M., "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: The Case of Oil Exporting Countries," Energy Policy, Vol. 35, 2007, pp. 2939-2945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.018
  17. Narayan, P. K. and R. Smyth, "Energy Consumption and Real GDP in G7 Countries: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration with Structural Breaks," Energy Economics, Vol. 30, 2008, pp. 2331-2341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.10.006
  18. Narayan, P. K., R. Smyth, "Multivariate Granger Causality between Electricity Consumption, Exports and GDP: Evidence from a Panel of Middle Eastern Countries," Energy Policym, Vol. 37, 2009, pp. 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.020
  19. Narayan, P. K., R. Smyth, ands A. Prasad, "Electricity Consumption in G7 Countries: A Panel Cointegrating Analysis of Residential Demand Elasticities," Energy Policy, Vol. 35, 2007, pp. 4485-4494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.018
  20. Ozturk, I., "A Literature Survey on Energy-growth Nexus," Energy Policy, Vol. 38, 2010, pp. 340-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.024
  21. Payne, J. E., "Survey of the International Evidence on the Causal Relationship between Energy Consumption and Growth," Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 37, 2010, pp. 53-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581011012261
  22. Pedroni, P., "Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, 1999, pp. 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14
  23. Pedroni, P., "Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panel", In: Baltagi, B. H., Fomby, T. B., Hill, R. C. (Ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels (Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15.) pp. 93-130, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2001.
  24. Pedroni, P., "Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels," Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 83, No. 4, 2001, pp. 727-731. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301753237803
  25. Sadorsky, P., "Energy Consumption, Output and trade in South America," Energy Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 476-468.
  26. Sadorsky, P., "Renewable Energy Consumption and Income in Emerging Economies," Energy Policy, Vol. 37, 2009b, pp. 4021-4028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.003
  27. Sadorsky, P., "Renewable Energy Consumption, $CO_2$ Emissions and Oil Prices in the G7 countries," Energy Economics, Vol. 31, 2009a, pp. 456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.12.010
  28. Sadorsky, P., "Trade and Energy Consumption in the Middle East," Energy Economics, Vol. 33, 2011, pp. 739-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.012