DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Distance Identification for Maximum Change in Ship Collision Risk through a Coast Guard Patrol Ship Experiment

해양경찰 함정 실험을 통한 선박충돌 위험도의 변화가 최대인 거리 식별에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.06.27
  • Accepted : 2017.08.28
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

Using two large coast guard ships at sea, we created four encounter situations ($000^{\circ}$, $045^{\circ}$, $090^{\circ}$, $135^{\circ}$) with high possibility of collision, from 3 NM up to 0.25 NM. As relative distance was gradually decreased, the subjects were measured at 0.25 NM intervals and perceived ship collision risk (PSCR) was determined by looking at the opponent ship. Characteristics were statistically analyzed using the obtained data. The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of collision risk values obtained from twelve intervals, from 3 NM to 0.25 NM relative to encounter situations by curve fitting with appropriate polynomials, to determine the distance from which the change in perceived collision risk is greatest. As a result, an optimal regression equation for each distance interval was derived from each analysis direction. The greatest variation in average collision risk value was over the range 1.25 ~ 1 NM, and the collision risk value was largest at 1 NM. The maximum change in perceived collision risk was at 1 NM. These results can contribute to preventive guidelines to minimize human error in close proximity situations with a high probability of ship collision.

해상에서 두 척의 대형 해양경찰 함정을 이용하여 충돌 가능성이 높은 네 가지 조우방위각($000^{\circ}$, $045^{\circ}$, $090^{\circ}$, $135^{\circ}$)을 설정하여 피험자인 30명의 해양경찰관을 대상으로 조우방위별 거리 3해리(Nautical Mile: NM)에서부터 0.25 NM까지 근접하며 상대거리가 점차 감소될 때 피험자들이 상대선박을 보며 지각한 충돌위험도(Perceived Ship Collision Risk, PSCR)를 측정(0.25 NM 간격으로 기록)하는 실험을 하였고 획득된 데이터를 이용하여 특징을 통계적으로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 목적은 인적오류 예방을 위하여 실선 실험한 선박 조우방위별 상대거리 3 NM에서 0.25 NM까지의 열두 구간에서 획득한 충돌위험도 값을 적정 다항식으로 곡선 근사(Curve Fitting)하여 분포곡선으로 나타내고 특징을 분석하여 항해당직자들이 지각한 충돌위험도의 변화가 최대인 거리를 제시하기 위한 것이다. 분석결과, 각 조우방위에서 거리 구간별 최적의 회귀방정식을 도출하였으며 거리 1.25 1 NM 구간에서 충돌위험도 평균값의 편차가 가장 크게 변화되었고, 특히 1 NM에서 충돌위험도 값이 가장 크게 나타나 실선 실험결과 항해당직자가 지각(Perception)한 충돌위험도의 변화 값이 최대인 거리가 1 NM임을 도출 및 검증하였으며 이는 선박 충돌가능성이 높은 근접상황에서 인적오류 예방 자료로 유용할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Acar, U., R. Ziarati and M. Ziarati(2012), Collisions and Groundings Major causes of accidents at sea, http://www.marifuture.org/Publications/Papers, pp. 48-51.
  2. Andrew, J. B.(1997), Human Error and the Implications for Industry, Human Factors, Archives, pp. 1-11.
  3. COLREGS(2005), COLREGS - International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, Lloyd's Register Rulefinder 2005, Version 9.4, June 30, 2013.
  4. Endsley, M. R.(1995), Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic System, Human Factors, 37(1), pp. 32-64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
  5. EXCEL(2016), Microsoft Excel(2016).
  6. IBM SPSS Statistics, Ver. 23(2011).
  7. Inoue, K.(2000), Evaluation Method of Ship-handling Difficulty for Navigation in Restricted and congested Waterways, Journal of Navigation, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463399008541
  8. Kim, D. S. and D. B. Kim(2015), Studies on the Officer's Feeling Response Data when the Ship Encounter Situation, Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Spring Conference in Busan, pp. 202-204.
  9. Kim, D. S. and J. B. Yim(2016), A Study on the Collision Risk Perception Index to OOW's According to Vessel Encountering Situations, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 98-107. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2016.22.1.098
  10. KMST(2017), Korea Maritime Safety Tribunal, Statistics of Marine Casualties, Sejong, pp. 6-28.
  11. Montewka, J., F. Goerlandt and P. Kujala(2012), Determination of collision criteia and causation factors appropriate to a model for estimating the probability of maritime accidents, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 40, pp. 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.12.006
  12. Montewka, J., T. Hinz, P. Kujala and J. Matusiak(2010), Probability modelling of vessel collisions, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 573-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.009
  13. Rasmussen, J.(1983), Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-13, No. 3, pp. 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160
  14. Ross, I.(1975), Perceived Risk and Consumer Behavior: a Critical Review, Association for Consumer Research, Vol. 2, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1086/208610
  15. Song, J. J.(2014), SPSS / AMOS statistical analysis method for writing paper, 21Century book. No. 2, pp.14-206.
  16. Tomasz N, Marek M and Anna J(2014), Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications, Technology & Engineering, pp. 1563-1571.
  17. Wikipedia(2015), Tutorial for Normal Distribution, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution.