DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Experimental Study on Structural Behavior of High-strength Concrete Members with Compressive Strength of 80 MPa Subjected to Flexure

휨을 받는 압축강도 80 MPa 수준의 고강도 콘크리트 부재의 구조거동 실험 연구

  • 양인환 (군산대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 황철성 (가천대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 김경철 (가천대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 조창빈 (한국건설기술연구원 구조융합연구소)
  • Received : 2016.08.17
  • Accepted : 2017.06.07
  • Published : 2017.07.01

Abstract

This paper concerns the structural behavior of high-strength concrete beams with compressive strength of 80 MPa subjected to flexure. Main test variables were nominal yielding strength of longitudinal rebar including normal strength rebar(SD 400) and high strength rebar(SD 600), reinforcement ratio from 0.98 to 1.58% and beam section size with $200{\times}250$, $200{\times}300mm$. The nine beams were cast and tested under flexure. The study investigated ultimate flexural strength, load-deflection relationship, crack patterns, failure patterns and ductility of the test beams. Test results indicate that when rebar ratio increased flexural strength increased and ductility decreased. In addition, the number of cracks increased and the crack width decreased as the reinforcement ratio increased. The yield strength of rebar did not affect significantly load-crack width relationship. Nonlinear analysis of test beams was performed and then test results and analytical results of ultimate load were compared. Analytical results of high-strength concrete beams overall underestimated flexural strength of test beams.

본 연구에서는 휨을 받는 압축강도 80 MPa 수준의 고강도 콘크리트 부재의 구조거동 실험 연구를 수행하였다. 실험변수는 보통(SD 400) 및 고강도(SD 600)철근, 0.98~1.58%의 종방향 철근비, $200{\times}250$, $200{\times}300mm$의 단면크기를 고려하였다. 9개의 보 부재를 제작하여 휨 실험을 수행하였으며 극한휨강도, 하중-처짐 관계, 균열 형태, 파괴형상 및 연성을 파악하였다. 실험결과는 철근비가 증가함에 따라 휨강도는 증가하고 연성은 감소한다. 또한, 철근비가 증가함에 따라 균열의 개수가 증가하며 균열폭은 감소하는 경향을 나타내었다. 철근의 강도 등급에 따른 하중-균열폭 관계는 뚜렷한 차이를 나타내지 않는다. 콘크리트 비선형거동 해석을 수행하였으며, 극한하중 예측값과 측정값을 비교하였다. 고강도 콘크리트의 휨거동 예측 결과는 실험부재의 휨강도를 전반적으로 과소평가하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification (2004), 3rd edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportations Officials, Washington, D.C.
  2. Alexander, A. N. and Macgregor, J. G. (1997), Effect of Size On Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Beams, ACI Structural Journal, 94(1), 59-67.
  3. Ashour, S. A. (2000), Effect of Compressive Strength and Tensile Reinforcement Ratio on Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Beams, Engineering Structures, 22(5), 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00135-7
  4. Bentz and Michael P. Collins (2000), Reinforced Concrete Sectional Analysis, Response-2000, Response version 1.0.5.
  5. Bentz, E. C. (2000), Sectional Analysis of Reinforced Concrete, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto.
  6. Cho, H. W., Bang, J. W., Han, B. C., and Kim, Y. Y. (2011), Flexural Experiments on Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with ECC and High Strength Rebar, Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, 23(4), 503-509. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2011.23.4.503
  7. Hong, G. H. (2011), Flexural Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Beams with High-Stregnth Concrete and Reinforcing Bars, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(6), 49-56.
  8. Jang, I. Y., Park, H. G., Kim, S. S., Kim, J. H., and Kim, Y. G. (2008), On the Ductility of High-Strength Concrete Beams, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2(2), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.4334/IJCSM.2008.2.2.115
  9. Jang, S. J., Kang, S. W., and Yun, H. D. (2015), Cracking Behavior and Flexural Performance of Rc Beam with Strain Hardening Cement Composite and High-Strength Reinforcing Bar, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 27(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2015.27.1.037
  10. Kaminska, M. E. (2002), High-Strength Concrete and Steel Interaction in RC Members, Cement and Concrete Composites, 24(2), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00011-7
  11. Kang, S. H. (1995), An Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High Strength Concrete Members with High Tension Bar, Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 15(1), 107-117.
  12. Korea Concrete Institute (2012), Design Code for Concrete Structural.
  13. Lambott, H., and Taerwe, L. R. (1990), Deflection and Cracking of High-Strength Concrete Beams and Slabs, High-Strength Concrete, Second International Symposium, SP121, American Concrete Institute, 109-128.
  14. Lee J. H. (1994), Analytical Study on Ductility Index of Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members, Journal of The Korean Society of Civel Engineers, 14(3), 391-402.
  15. Mansur, A. A., Chin, M. S., and Wee, T. H. (1997), Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Beams, ACI Structural Journal, 94(6), 663-674.
  16. Mast, R. F., Dawood, M., Rizkalla, S. H., and Zia, P. (2008), Flexural Strength Design of Concrete Beams Reinforced with High-Strength Steel Bars, ACI Structural Journal, 105(5), 570-577.
  17. Moon, D. Y. (2013), Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with High-Strength Steel Bars, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 13(6), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.6.107
  18. Pam, H. J., Kwan, A. K. H., and Islam, M. S. (2001), Flexural Strength and Ductility of Reinforced Normal-and High-Strength Concrete Beams, Proceeding of the ICE-Structures and Buildings, 146(4), 381-389 (30-100).
  19. Popovics, S. (1973), A Numerical Approach to the Complete Stress-Strain Curve of Concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, 3(5), 583-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3
  20. Rashid, M. A., and Mansur, M. A. (2005), Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Beams in Flexure, ACI Structural Journal, 102(3), 462-471.
  21. Russell, H. G., Voltz, J. S., and Bruce, R. N. (1997), Optimized Sections for High-Strength Concrete Bridge Girders, Report No. FHWA-RD-95-180, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 156 pp.
  22. Russell, H. G. (1997), High-Performance Concrete-From Buildings to Bridges, Concrete International, 19(8), 62-63.
  23. Sarkar, S., Adwan, O., and Munday, J. G. L. (1997), High Strength Concrete: an Investigation of the Flexural Behavior of High Strength RC Beams, Structural Engineer, 75(7), 115-121.
  24. Wang, I. S., and Lee, S. H. (2003), An Application of 800 kgf/$cm^2$ High Strength Concrete on High Rise Building, Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, 15(3), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2003.15.1.087
  25. Wu, Z. (2006), Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Members Under Pure Flexure and Axial-Flexural Loadings, PhD Thesis, Dissertation of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.