DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Action Observation Training with Auditory Feedback for Gait Function of Stroke Patients with Hemiparesis

  • Kim, Hyeong Min (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Cheongju University) ;
  • Son, Sung Min (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Cheongju University)
  • Received : 2017.09.07
  • Accepted : 2017.10.18
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies have reported that action observation training has beneficial effects on enhancing the motor task, such as balance and gait functions. On the other hand, there have been few studies combined with action observation training and auditory feedback. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of action observation training with auditory feedback on the gait function in stroke patients with hemiparesis Methods: A total of 24 inpatients with post-stroke hemiparesis were assigned randomly to either an experimental group 1 (EG 1, n=8), experiment group 2 (EG 2, n=8), control group (CG, n=8, EG 1). The EG 2 and CG watched video clip demonstrating three functional walking tasks with auditory feedback, without auditory feedback, and showing a landscape image, respectively. The exercise program consisted of 30 minutes, five times a week, for four weeks. The participants were measured to 10MWT (10 m walk test), 6MWT (6 minutes walking distance test), TUG (timed up and go test), DGI (dynamic gait index), time and steps of F8WT (figure-of-8 walk test). Results: In the intra-group comparison after the intervention, EG 1 and EG 2 showed a significantly different gait function (10MWT, 6MWT, DGI, TUG, F8WT) (p<0.05). In the inter-group comparison after intervention, EG 1 showed significant improvements in the entire gait parameters and EG 2 only showed significant improvement in DGI and TUG compared to CG (p<0.05). Conclusion: These findings show that action observation training with auditory feedback may be used beneficially for improving the gait function of stroke patients with hemiparesis.

Keywords

References

  1. Flansbjer UB, Downham D, Lexell J. Knee muscle strength, gait performance, and perceived participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(7):974-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.03.008
  2. Grysiewicz RA, Thomas K, Pandey DK. Epidemiology of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: incidence, prevalence, mortality, and risk factors. Neurol Clin. 2008;26(4):871-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2008.07.003
  3. Horak FB, Henry SM, Shumway-Cook A. Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. Phys Ther. 1997;77(5):517-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.5.517
  4. Kim MG, Kim JH, Park JW. The effect of turning training on figure of 8 tract on stoke patients' balance and walking. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):143-50.
  5. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK et al. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995;26(6):982-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.982
  6. Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007;38(7):2096-100. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.475921
  7. Dickstein R. Rehabilitation of gait speed after stroke: a critical review of intervention approaches. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(6):649-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308315997
  8. Dobkin BH, Plummer-D'Amato P, Elashoff R et al. International randomized clinical trial, stroke inpatient rehabilitation with reinforcement of walking speed (sirrows), improves outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(3):235-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309357558
  9. Kesar TM, Reisman DS, Perumal R et al. Combined effects of fast treadmill walking and functional electrical stimulation on post-stroke gait. Gait Posture. 2011;33(2):309-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.019
  10. Mulroy SJ, Klassen T, Gronley JK et al. Gait parameters associated with responsiveness to treadmill training with body-weight support after stroke: an exploratory study. Phys Ther. 2010;90(2):209-23. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090141
  11. Ada L, Dean CM, Hall JM et al. A treadmill and overground walking program improves walking in persons residing in the community after stroke: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(10):1486-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00349-6
  12. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26(6):976-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.976
  13. Dettmers C, Braun N, Busching I et al. [Neurofeedback-based motor imagery training for rehabilitation after stroke]. Nervenarzt. 2016;87(10):1074-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-016-0185-y
  14. Park HJ, Oh DW, Choi JD et al. Action observation training of community ambulation for improving walking ability of patients with poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):1078-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516671982
  15. Song YH, Lee HM. The effect of treadmill training applied simultaneously with action observation on walking ability in chronic stroke patients. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(3):176-82. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.3.176
  16. Mulder T. Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm. 2007;114(10):1265-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-007-0763-z
  17. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M et al. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science. 1999;286(5449):2526-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5449.2526
  18. Kim JD, Cha YJ, Youn HJ. Effects of emphasized initial contact auditory feedback gait training on balance and gait in stroke patients. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2015;10(4):49-57. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2015.10.4.49
  19. van Loo MA, Moseley AM, Bosman JM et al. Test-re-test reliability of walking speed, step length and step width measurement after traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj. 2004;18(10):1041-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050410001672314
  20. Mossberg KA. Reliability of a timed walk test in persons with acquired brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(5):385-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PHM.0000052589.96202.BE
  21. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "up & go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
  22. An SH, Seo HD, Chung YJ. Reliability and validity the Korean version of the dynamic gait index in patients with stroke. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2011;50(2):289-306.
  23. Kim YH, Lim JH. The reliability and validity of figure-of-8 walk test in patients with stroke. J Kor Acad Clin Elec. 2012;10(1):29-38. https://doi.org/10.5627/KACE.2012.10.1.029
  24. Kim JH, Lee BH. Action observation training for functional activities after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):565-74.
  25. Kim JS, Kim K. Effect of motor imagery training with visual and kinesthetic imagery training on balance ability in post stroke hemiparesis. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2010;5(4):517-25.
  26. Pan SH. Principles of empathy training derived from the ways to fire the mirror neuron. Theology and Praxis. 2010;24(2):87-107.
  27. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;27:169-92.
  28. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F et al. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2003;20(2):1171-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00369-0
  29. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001;14(1 Pt 2):S103-9. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
  30. Gangitano M, Mottaghy FM, Pascual-Leone A. Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation. Neurore port. 2001;12(7):1489-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200105250-00038
  31. Thielman G, Kaminski T, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: comparing 2 training protocols utilizing trunk restraint. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(6):697-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308315998
  32. Thaut MH, Kenyon GP, Hurt CP et al. Kinematic optimization of spatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(7):1073-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00141-5
  33. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 2000;31(10):2390-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2390
  34. Hayden R, Clair AA, Johnson G et al. The effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) on physical therapy outcomes for patients in gait training following stroke: a feasibility study. Int J Neurosci. 2009;119(12):2183-95. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207450903152609
  35. Rochester L, Hetherington V, Jones D et al. The effect of external rhythmic cues (auditory and visual) on walking during a functional task in homes of people with Parkinson's disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(5):999-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.040
  36. Fuhrmann Alpert G, Hein G, Tsai N et al. Temporal characteristics of audiovisual information processing. J Neurosci. 2008;28(20):5344-9. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5039-07.2008

Cited by

  1. An Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of a Korean Version of the Mobility and Gait Assessment Tools for Patients with Stroke vol.30, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.1.29
  2. 리듬청각자극을 동반한 동작관찰 신체훈련이 만성 뇌졸중 환자의 하지 근활성도와 보행능력에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2018.13.2.137
  3. A Comprasion of the Activation of Mirror Neurons Induced by Action Observation between Simple and Complex Hand Movement vol.31, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.3.157
  4. The Effect of Action Observation Training with Acoustic Stimulation on Balance and Gait in Stroke Patients vol.16, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2021.16.4.13