Journal of Information Processing Systems

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Ampacity of Overhead Transmission Lines Being Operated

  • Yan, Zhijie (School of Mechanical, Electrical and Information Engineering, Shandong University) ;
  • Wang, Yanling (School of Mechanical, Electrical and Information Engineering, Shandong University) ;
  • Liang, Likai (School of Mechanical, Electrical and Information Engineering, Shandong University)
  • Received : 2016.10.06
  • Accepted : 2017.04.11
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dynamic thermal rating (DTR) system is an effective method to improve the capacity of existing overhead line. According to the methodology based on CIGRE (International Council on Large Electric systems) standard, ampacity values under steady-state heating balance can be calculated from ambient environmental conditions. In this study, simulation analysis of relations between parameters and ampacity is described as functional dependence, which can provide an effective basis for the design and research of overhead transmission lines. The simulation of ampacity variation in different rating scales is described in this paper, which are determined from real-time meteorological data and conductor state parameters. To test the performance of DTR in different rating scales, capacity improvement and risk level are presented. And the experimental results show that the capacity of transmission line by using DTR has significant improvement, with low probability of risk. The information of this study has an important reference value to the operation management of power grid.

Keywords

References

  1. L. K. Liang, "Studies on overhead transmission line power transfer capability," Ph.D. dissertation, Shandong University (SDU), Jinan, China, 2013.
  2. J. Teh and I. Cotton, "Risk informed design modification of dynamic thermal rating system," IET Generation Transmission & Distribution, vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 2697-2704, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0351
  3. M. W. Davis, "A new thermal rating approach: the real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines. Part I: general description and justification of the real time thermal rating system," IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 803-809, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-PAS.1977.32393
  4. M. W. Davis, "A new thermal rating approach: the real time thermal rating system for strategic overhead conductor transmission lines. Part II: steady state thermal rating program," IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 810-825, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-PAS.1977.32394
  5. J. Teh and I. Cotton, "Critical span identification model for dynamic thermal rating system placement," IET Generation Transmission & Distribution, vol. 9, no. 16, pp. 2644-2652, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0601
  6. J. Hosek, P. Musilek, E. Lozowski, and P. Pytlak, "Effect of time resolution of meteorological inputs on dynamic thermal rating calculations," IET Generation Transmission & Distribution, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 941-947, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0039
  7. CIGRE Working Group B2/C1.19, Increasing Capacity of Overhead Transmission Lines: Needs and Solutions. Paris: CIGRE, 2010.
  8. H. Zhang, X. S. Han, and Y. L. Wang, "Analysis on current carrying capacity of overhead lines being operated," Power System Technology, vol. 32, no. 14, pp. 31-35, 2008.
  9. M. Siler, J. Heckenbergerova, P. Musilek, and J. Redway, "Sensitivity analysis of conductor currenttemperature calculations," in Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Regina, Canada, 2013, pp. 1-4.
  10. X. Hu and I. Cotton, "Impact of climate change on overhead lines operated using dynamic rating in a smart gird," in Proceedings of 4th IEEE/PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe, Lyngby, Denmark, 2013, pp. 1-5.
  11. J. Heckenbergerova, P. Musilek, and K. Filimonenkov, "Assessment of seasonal static thermal ratings of overhead transmission conductors," in Proceedings of IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2011, pp. 1-8.
  12. A. Safdarian, M. Z. Degefa, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and M. Lehtonen, "Benefits of real-time monitoring to distribution systems: dynamic thermal rating," IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2023-2031, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2393366
  13. J. Heckenbergerova, P. Musilek, and K. Filimonenkov, "Quantification of gains and risks of static thermal rating based on typical meteorological year," International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 44, no.1, pp. 227-235, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.07.005
  14. D. A. Douglass and A. A. Edris, "Real-time monitoring and dynamic thermal rating of power transmission circuits," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1407-1418, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.517499
  15. C. R. Black and W. A. Chisholm, "Key considerations for the selection of dynamic thermal line rating systems," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2154-2162, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2376275
  16. M. Khaki, M. M. I. Bhuiyan, J. Heckenbergerova, D. Koval, and P. Musilek, "Impact of local weather conditions on transmission line ratings," IIAS-Transactions on Systems Research and Cybernetics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33-38, 2010.