The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of staining liquids and finishing methods on translucency of a hybrid ceramic material having two different translucency levels

  • Received : 2017.02.06
  • Accepted : 2017.05.29
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. Beverages may affect the translucency of esthetic dental restorative materials.The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of coffee and red wine on the translucency of a PICN material with two translucency levels, and finished with different methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 2M2 high translucent and translucent VITA Enamic hybrid ceramic blocks were investigated. Rectangular specimens with the dimensions of $12mm{\times}14mm{\times}2mm$ were prepared. The specimens were finished and polished with different methods as suggested by the manufacturer. The translucency parameters of the specimens were evaluated before and after 24 hours, 7 days, and 28 days immersion in distilled water, coffee and red wine. Translucency parameters were measured using a portable spectrophotometer. RESULTS. At the end of 28 days, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups of specimens kept in coffee (P>.05). In the red wine groups, there was a statistically significant difference between the control group and all other groups (P<.05) at the end of 28 days. CONCLUSION. The translucency of hybrid ceramic for a restoration may not be important regarding the effects of coffee on translucency change because the specimens with different translucencies and finishing methods that were immersed to coffee had similar translucency parameters at the end of 28 days. The translucency of hybrid ceramic may be important in the case of red wine, however, since the results showed that highly translucent specimens exposed to red wine demonstrated better translucency parameters than specimens made from translucent blocks at the end of 28 days.

Keywords

References

  1. Culpepper WD. A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24:166-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90140-X
  2. Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29:358-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(73)80013-7
  3. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. 3. Color control. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:146-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90049-3
  4. Brodbelt RH, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL. Translucency of dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1980;59:70-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590011101
  5. Miyagawa Y, Powers JM, O'Brien WJ. Optical properties of direct restorative materials. J Dent Res 1981;60:890-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600050601
  6. O'Keefe KL, Pease PL, Herrin HK. Variables affecting the spectral transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:434-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90501-M
  7. Watts DC, Cash AJ. Analysis of optical transmission by 400-500 nm visible light into aesthetic dental biomaterials. J Dent 1994;22:112-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90014-0
  8. ten Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Tooth color and reflectance as related to light scattering and enamel hardness. J Dent Res 1995;74: 374-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011401
  9. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Ionescu AM, Cardona JC, Della Bona A, Perez Mdel M. Optical behavior of dental zirconia and dentin analyzed by Kubelka-Munk theory. Dent Mater 2015; 31:60-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.012
  10. Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Guth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;55:1-11.
  11. Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79-86.
  12. Ragain JC Jr, Johnston WM. Accuracy of Kubelka-Munk reflectance theory applied to human dentin and enamel. J Dent Res 2001;80:449-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800020901
  13. Comlekoglu ME, Paken G, Tan F, Dundar-Comlekoglu M, Ozcan M, Akan E, Aladag A. Evaluation of different thickness, die color, and resin cement shade for veneers of multilayered CAD/CAM blocks. J Prosthodont 2016;25:563-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12367
  14. Jurisic S, Jurisic G, Zlataric DK. In vitro evaluation and comparison of the translucency of two different all-ceramic systems. Acta Stomatol Croat 2015;49:195-203. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/1
  15. Harlow JE, Rueggeberg FA, Labrie D, Sullivan B, Price RB. Transmission of violet and blue light through conventional (layered) and bulk cured resin-based composites. J Dent 2016;53:44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.06.007
  16. Pecho OE, Ghinea R, do Amaral EA, Cardona JC, Della Bona A, Perez MM. Relevant optical properties for direct restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016;32:e105-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.02.008
  17. Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:37-42. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.37
  18. Harada R, Takemoto S, Hattori M, Yoshinari M, Oda Y, Kawada E. The influence of colored zirconia on the optical properties of all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater J 2015;34: 918-24. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-171
  19. Hyun HK, Ferracane JL. Influence of biofilm formation on the optical properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites. Dent Mater 2016;32:1144-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.011
  20. Lee WS, Kim SY, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim HY. The effect of powder A2/powder A3 mixing ratio on color and translucency parameters of dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7: 400-5. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.400
  21. Pop-Ciutrila IS, Dudea D, Eugenia Badea M, Moldovan M, Cimpean SI, Ghinea R. Shade correspondence, color, and translucency differences between human dentine and a CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28: S46-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12195
  22. Guth JF, Kauling AE, Ueda K, Florian B, Stimmelmayr M. Transmission of light in the visible spectrum (400-700 nm) and blue spectrum (360-540 nm) through CAD/CAM polymers. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2501-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1755-x
  23. Ozarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US, Barutcigil C, Arslan M, Turker N, Barutcigil K. Effects of different surface finishing procedures on the change in surface roughness and color of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network material. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:16-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.16
  24. Al Kheraif AA, Qasim SS, Ramakrishnaiah R, Ihtesham ur Rehman. Effect of different beverages on the color stability and degree of conversion of nano and microhybrid composites. Dent Mater J 2013;32:326-31. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-267
  25. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:377-83. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-238
  26. Samra AP, Pereira SK, Delgado LC, Borges CP. Color stability evaluation of aesthetic restorative materials. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:205-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242008000300003
  27. Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:71-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.014
  28. Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:908-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.006
  29. Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJ. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of esthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int 2010;41: 695-702.

Cited by

  1. Assessing staining resistance of a CAD/CAM interpenetrating network composite material vol.14, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-018-0184-2
  2. Colour stability and surface properties of high‐translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing vol.128, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12676
  3. Color Stability of Dental Reinforced CAD/CAM Hybrid Composite Blocks Compared to Regular Blocks vol.13, pp.21, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214722
  4. Influence of toothbrush abrasion and surface treatments on the color and translucency of resin infiltrated hybrid ceramics vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.1
  5. Comparison of translucency and opalescence among different dental monolithic ceramics vol.126, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.030
  6. Optical properties of bisacryl‐, composite‐, ceramic‐ resin restorative materials: An aging simulation study vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12653
  7. Effect of colourants on the optical characteristics and structure of Y 2 O 3 stabilised tetragonal zirconia ceramic vol.137, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/cote.12546