The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy of several implant bite registration techniques: an in-vitro pilot study

  • Park, Do-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translation Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Jae-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translation Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kang, Eun-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, In-Je University Haeundae Paik Hospital) ;
  • Bae, Eun-Bin (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translation Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translation Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translation Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translation Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translation Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2016.10.05
  • Accepted : 2017.04.20
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the accuracies of different bite registration techniques for implant-fixed prostheses using three dimensional file analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Implant fixtures were placed on the mandibular right second premolar, and the first and second molar in a polyurethane model. Aluwax (A), Pattern Resin (P), and Blu-Mousse (B) were used as the bite registration materials on the healing abutments (H) or temporary abutments (T). The groups were classified into HA, HP, HB, TA, TP, and TB according to each combination. The group using the bite impression coping was the BC group; impression taking and bite registration were performed simultaneously. After impression and bite taking, the scan bodies were connected to the lab analogs of the casts. These casts were scanned using a model scanner. The distances between two reference points in three-dimensional files were measured in each group. One-way ANOVA and Duncan's test were used at the 5% significance level. RESULTS. The smallest distance discrepancy was observed in the TB group using the temporary abutments. The Blu-Mousse and HP groups showed the largest distance discrepancy. The TB and BC groups showed a lower distance discrepancy than the HP group (P=.001), and there was no significant difference between the groups using the temporary abutments and healing abutments (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Although this study has limitations as an in-vitro investigation, the groups using the temporary abutments to hold the Blu-Mousse record and bite impression coping showed greater accuracy than the group using the healing abutments to hold the pattern resin record.

Keywords

References

  1. Freilich MA, Altieri JV, Wahle JJ. Principles for selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:361-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90346-C
  2. Ockert-Eriksson G, Eriksson A, Lockowandt P, Eriksson O. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:152-8.
  3. Anup G, Ahila SC, Vasanthakumar M. Evaluation of dimensional stability, accuracy and surface hardness of interocclusal recording materials at various time intervals: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2011;11:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0054-0
  4. Mullick SC, Stackhouse JA Jr, Vincent GR. A study of interocclusal record materials. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90219-5
  5. Savabi O, Nejatidanesh F. Interocclusal record for fixed implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:602-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.004
  6. Wicks R, Ahuja S, Jain V, Ferreira CF. A technique to create an interocclusal bite registration using in situ implant healing abutments. J Tenn Dent Assoc 2013;93:47-9.
  7. Monzavi A, Alikhasi M, Taghavi F. Occlusal recording components for dental implant-supported prostheses. J Dent (Tehran) 2012;9:76-8.
  8. Tejo SK, Kumar AG, Kattimani VS, Desai PD, Nalla S, Chaitanya KK. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study. Head Face Med 2012;8:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-27
  9. Chun JH, Pae A, Kim SH. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:115-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.016
  10. Roh JY, Kamg MK, Shim SY, Kim KN, Kim KM. Evaluation of physical properties of polyvinylsiloxane interocclusal recording materials. Res Soc Dent Mater 2006;33:301-7.
  11. Ghazal M, Ludwig K, Habil RN, Kern M. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. Quintessence Int 2008;39:727-32.
  12. Gibbs SB, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja S. Comparison of polymerization shrinkage of pattern resins. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:293-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.006
  13. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part I: Plaster, impression compound, and wax. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:263-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90192-F
  14. Park HY, Chang IT, Kim KN. An experimental study on the accuracy of interocclusal recording materials. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1990;28:91-108.
  15. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Kinderknecht KE. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:265-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90465-0
  16. Park JY, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:294-302. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.294
  17. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, Kraft E. Study of the accuracy of different recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90263-C
  18. Iwaki Y, Wakabayashi N, Igarashi Y. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations. Oper Dent 2013;38:309-15. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-233-L
  19. Tripodakis AP, Vergos VK, Tsoutsos AG. Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:141-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70227-0
  20. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100:285-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5
  21. Parker MH, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Reid DE. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:255-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70023-4
  22. Lassila V. Comparison of five interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:215-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90347-1
  23. Michalakis KX, Pissiotis A, Anastasiadou V, Kapari D. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part II: Linear dimensional change and accompanying weight change. J Prosthodont 2004;13:150-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04024.x
  24. Millstein PL, Kronman JH, Clark RE. Determination of the accuracy of wax interocclusal registrations. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:189-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90107-7
  25. Vergos VK, Tripodakis AP. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:365-8.
  26. Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35: 816-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01870.x
  27. Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:684-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90296-O
  28. Muller J, Gotz G, Horz W, Kraft E. An experimental study on the influence of the derived casts on the accuracy of different recording materials. Part II: Polyether, acrylic resin, and corrected wax wafer. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:389-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90225-2
  29. Millstein PL, Hsu CC. Differential accuracy of elastomeric recording materials and associated weight change. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:400-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90103-1
  30. Breeding LC, Dixon DL. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:876-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90542-I
  31. Odman PA, Jemt TM. Accuracy of impression materials in a semi-clinical model. Dent Mater 1988;4:64-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80092-7
  32. Klineberg I, Jagger R. Occlusion and clinical practice: an evidence-based approach. Edinburgh; Wright/Elsevier; 2004. p. 83-9.
  33. Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Linden GJ, James JA. Occlusal considerations in periodontics. Br Dent J 2001;191:597-604.

Cited by

  1. A comparative evaluation of three dimensional accuracy of different types of interocclusal recording materials - an in vitro study vol.93, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1453
  2. Variability of dimensional stability of different interocclusal recording materials according to time: A comparative in vitro study vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_277_20
  3. An Alternate Technique for Precise Transfer of Information from the Provisional to Definitive Full-mouth Restorations vol.11, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1310