DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The dimension analysis of prepared natural teeth for developing customized zirconia block

맞춤형 지르코니아 블락 제작을 위한 삭제된 치아의 평균 크기 분석

  • Kim, Min-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Yoon, Hyung-In (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • 김민혁 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김성훈 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 여인성 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 윤형인 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이재현 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 한중석 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2017.06.07
  • Accepted : 2017.08.21
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: Unpredictable shrinkage of zirconia during sintering process causes discrepancy. Therefore, there have been attempts to reduce discrepancy by milling zirconia after sintering. However, due to the hardness of sintered zirconia, milling takes longer time, causes damage to the machine and causes chip formation. With customized zirconia block using the mean dimension of prepared natural dentition, it is expected to overcome these shortcomings. Materials and methods: The mean dimension of prepared natural dentition was analyzed as STL file after scanning of prepared teeth treated at SNUDH. The transverse, frontal and sagittal planes were set using Mimics and Photoshop. 3D volume was projected on each plane, and the outer line was measured through external tangent line, and the inner line was measured through inflection point of tangent line. Results: The mean height of prepared incisal (N = 57) is $6.60{\pm}1.05mm$, mesiodistal length is $2.98{\pm}0.73mm$, buccolingual length is $2.04{\pm}0.73mm$. The mean height of prepared premolar (N = 15) is $5.37{\pm}1.49mm$, mesiodistal length is $4.10{\pm}1.78mm$, buccolingual length is $5.86{\pm}1.55mm$. And the mean height of prepared molar (N = 13) is $5.11{\pm}1.29mm$, mesiodistal length is $6.80{\pm}1.18mm$, buccolingual length is $7.34{\pm}1.40mm$. Conclusion: Using the mean dimension of prepared natural dentition, it is expected to be able to fabricate customized zirconia block.

목적: 지르코니아는 소결 과정에서 3차원적으로 수축이 일어나기 때문에, 원하지 않는 체적 변화에 따른 오차가 존재하여 완전 소결된 지르코니아를 밀링하여, 오차를 줄이려는 노력이 있었으나, 재료의 단단함으로 인해 밀링 시간이 오래 걸리고, 밀링기구에 손상이 생길 수 있고, 기공 과정 중 칩 생성이 있을 수 있다. 삭제된 치아의 평균값을 구하여 제작된 맞춤 지르코니아 블락은 이러한 단점을 극복 할 수 있을 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 삭제된 치아들을 모델화하여 스캔 후 얻어진 STL file을 이용하여, 치아 크기를 분석하였다. Mimics 및 포토샵을 사용하여 각각의 치아의 횡단면, 전두면, 시상면, 세 면을 기준면으로 정하여, 각각의 면에 3D volume을 투영 후 외곽의 크기는 외곽 접선을 통해, 내곽의 크기는 내부 홀의 상단 부 변곡점에 접선을 구하여 각각 치아의 크기를 분석하였다. 결과: 측정에서 보여준 삭제된 전치군(N = 57) 치아의 평균 치관 길이는 $6.60{\pm}1.05mm$, 근원심 $2.98{\pm}0.73mm$, 협설 $2.04{\pm}0.73mm$이고, 소구치군(N = 15) 치아의 평균 치관 길이는 $5.37{\pm}1.49mm$, 근원심 $4.10{\pm}1.78mm$, 협설 $5.86{\pm}1.55mm$, 대구치군(N = 13) 치아의 평균 치관길이는 $5.11{\pm}1.29mm$, 근원심 $6.80{\pm}1.18mm$, 협설 $7.34{\pm}1.40mm$이다. 결론: 한국인의 전치부, 소구치부, 대구치부 치아의 삭제량과 치아 크기 값의 평균값을 구함으로써 그 값을 이용하여 맞춤형 지르코니아 블락을 만들 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Giordano RA. Dental ceramic restorative systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:779-82, 784-6 passim; quiz 794.
  2. Campbell SD. A comparative strength study of metal ceramic and all-ceramic esthetic materials: modulus of rupture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:476-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90184-4
  3. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:239-46.
  4. Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:viii, 513-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.003
  5. Kang DW. Fixed prosthodontics. 1st ed. DanhanNarae Publishing; Seoul; 2012. p. 330.
  6. Okutan M, Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:827-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01637.x
  7. Hjerppe J, Vallittu PK, Froberg K, Lassila LV. Effect of sintering time on biaxial strength of zirconium dioxide. Dent Mater 2009;25:166-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.011
  8. Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara T. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2007;26:820-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.820
  9. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962;48:504-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(62)90129-X
  10. Kim EJ, Hwang HS. Reproducibility and accuracy of tooth size measurements obtained by the use of computer. Korean J Orthod 1999;29:563-73.
  11. Sim EJ, Hwang HS, Moon JD. A study on the error of tooth size measurements. Korean J Orthod 1999;29:491-502.
  12. Kim DS, Kim YJ, Choi JH, Han JH. A study of Korean norm about tooth size and ratio in Korean adults with normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 2001;31:505-15.
  13. Lee SP. Dental anatomy. 1st ed. DanhanNarae Publishing; Seoul; 2009. p. 46.