DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of wheat supplementation levels on growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient digestibility, and pork quality in growing-finishing pigs

  • Han, Tae Hee (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, Jin Su (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Fang, Lin Hu (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Do, Sung Ho (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Byung Ock (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yoo Yong (School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2016.10.24
  • Accepted : 2017.01.28
  • Published : 2017.08.01

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate various wheat supplementation levels on growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient digestibility, and pork quality in growing-finishing pigs. Methods: A total of 120 growing pigs ($[Yorkshire{\times}Landrace]{\times}Duroc$), with an average $27.75{\pm}1.319kg$ body weight, were used in growth trial. Pigs were allotted into each treatment by body weight and sex in 4 replicates with 6 pigs per pen in a randomized complete block design. Fourphase feeding programs were used in this experiment. The treatments included the following: i) corn-soybean meal (SBM) - based diet (CON), ii) corn-SBM - based diet+15% of wheat (W15), iii) corn-SBM - based diet+30% of wheat (W30), iv) corn-SBM - based diet+45% of wheat (W45), and 5) corn-SBM-based diet+60% of wheat (W60). Results: There was no significant difference in growth performance among the dietary treatments. However, the gain-to-feed (G:F) ratio tended to increase (quadratic, p<0.08) when the pigs were fed a higher wheat diet during the finishing period. The digestibility of crude ash and fat tended to decrease as the wheat supplementation level increased (p<0.08). The proximate analysis of the longissimus muscle was not affected by the dietary level of wheat. The crude ash content in pork was decreased linearly as the wheat supplementation level increased (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the pH level, shear force, water holding capacity, and cooking loss of the pork. In pork and fat, $L^{\star}$, $a^{\star}$, and $b^{\star}$ values were not significantly different among dietary treatments. Conclusion: Wheat can be supplemented up to 60% in a growing-finishing pig without detrimental effects on growth and pork quality. The G:F ratio tended to improve in the finishing period by wheat inclusion.

Keywords

References

  1. Hasha G. Livestock feeding and feed imports in the European Union-A decade of change. Electronic Outlook Report from the Economic Research Service United States Department of Agriculture. 2002.
  2. Stein HH, Pahm AA, Roth JA. Feeding wheat to pigs. Swine Focus 2010;2:1-8.
  3. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC:National Academy Press; 2012.
  4. Jaworski NW, Lærke HN, Bach Knudsen KE, Stein HH. Carbohydrate composition and in vitro digestibility of dry matter and nonstarch polysaccharides in corn, sorghum, and wheat and coproducts from these grains. J Anim Sci 2015;93;1103-13. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8147
  5. Han Y, Soita JW, Thacker PA. Performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs fed wheat or corn-based diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2005;18:704-10. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.704
  6. Cromwell GL. Impacts of genetically modified, low-phytate corn and soybean meal and transgenic pigs possessing salivary phytase on phosphorus excretion. New Developments Regarding the Pig's Need for Vitamins E, A, and C. 2002;5:59.
  7. Phillippy BQ. Susceptibility of wheat and Aspergillus niger phytases to inactivation by gastrointestinal enzymes. J Agri Food Chem 1999; 47:1385-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf981107x
  8. FAO Cereal Supply and Demand Brief [Internet]. Rome, Italy: [cited 2015 May], p. 1. Available from: http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/
  9. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th ed. Washington, DC:National Academy Press; 1998.
  10. Horwitz W, Latimer Jr. GW; AOAC Official methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International; 2005.
  11. Seerley RW, Vandergrift WL, Hale OM. Effect of particle size of wheat on performance of nursery, growing and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 1988;66:2484-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.66102484x
  12. Lunen TV, Schulze H. Influence of Trichoderma longibrachiatum xylanase supplementation of wheat and corn based diets on growth performance of pigs. Can J Anim Sci 1996;76:271-3. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas96-041
  13. Carr SN, Rincker PJ, Killefer J, et al. Effects of different cereal grains and ractopamine hydrochloride on performance, carcass characteristics, and fat quality in late-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2005;83:223-30. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.831223x
  14. Bruneau CD, Chavez ER. Dietary preferences for cereals of nursing and weaned piglets. Livest Prod Sci 1995;41:225-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(94)00060-K
  15. Mavromichalis I, Hancock JD, Senne BW, et al. Enzyme supplementation and particle size of wheat in diets for nursery and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2000;78:3086-95. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.78123086x
  16. Pedersen C, Boersma MG, Stein HH. Digestibility of energy and phosphorus in ten samples of distillers dried grains with solubles fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2007;85:1168-76. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-252
  17. Sauer WC, Stothers SC, Parker RJ. Apparent and true availabilities of amino acids in wheat and milling by-products for growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci 1977;57:775-84. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas77-099
  18. Woyengo TA, Sands JS, Guenter W, Nyachoti CM. Nutrient digestibility and performance responses of growing pigs fed phytase-and xylanasesupplemented wheat-based diets. J Anim Sci 2008;86:848-57. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0018
  19. Lyberg K, Andersson HK., Sands JS, Lindberg JE. Influence of phytase and xylanase supplementation of a wheat-based diet on digestibility and performance in growing pigs. Acta Agric Scand 2008;58:146-51.
  20. Powell JJ, Whitehead MW, Lee S. Mechanisms of gastrointestinal absorption: dietary minerals and the influence of beverage ingestion. Food Chem 1994;51:381-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(94)90189-9
  21. Graham H, Hesselman K, Aman P. The influence of wheat bran and sugar-beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cerealbased pig diet. J Nutr 1986;116:242-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/116.2.242
  22. Choct M, Annison G. Anti-nutritive activity of wheat pentosans in poultry diets. Br Poult Sci 1990;31:809-19.
  23. Noblet J, Perez JM. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. J Anim Sci 1993;71:3389-98. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x
  24. Kil DY, Sauber TE, Jones DB, Stein HH. Effect of the form of dietary fat and the concentration of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal and total tract endogenous losses and apparent and true digestibility of fat by growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2010;88:2959-67. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2216
  25. Bergsjo B, Langseth W, Nafstad I, Jansen JH, Larsen HJS. The effects of naturally deoxynivalenol-contaminated oats on the clinical condition, blood parameters, performance and carcass composition of growing pigs. Vet Res 1993;17:283-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01839219
  26. Matthews JO, Southern LL, Pontif JE, Higbie AD, Bidner TD. Interactive effects of betaine, crude protein, and net energy in finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 1998;76:2444-55. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7692444x
  27. Danicke S, Valenta H, Klobasa F, et al. Effects of graded levels of Fusarium toxin contaminated wheat in diets for fattening pigs on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, deoxynivalenol balance and clinical serum characteristics. Arch Anim Nutr 2004;58:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003942031000161045
  28. Miller ER, Ullre DE, Ackerma I, et al. Swine hematology from birth to maturity. I. Serum protein. J Anim Sci 1961;20:31-5. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1961.20131x
  29. Eggum, BO. Blood urea measurement as a technique for assessing protein quality. Br J Nutr 1970;24:983-8. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19700101
  30. Baxmann AC, Ahmed MS, Marques NC, et al. Influence of muscle mass and physical activity on serum and urinary creatinine and serum cystatin C. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:348-54. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02870707
  31. Okrouhla M, Stupka R, Citek J, et al. Effect of lean meat proportion on the chemical composition of pork. Czech J Food Sci 2008;26:464-9.
  32. Brewer MS, McKeith FK. Consumer-rated quality characteristics as related to purchase intent of fresh pork. J Food Sci 1999;64:171-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb09885.x
  33. Maganhini MB, Mariano B, Soares AL, et al. Meats PSE (Pale, Soft, Exudative) and DFD (Dark, Firm, Dry) of an industrial slaughterline for swine loin. Cienc Tecnol Aliment, Campinas, 2007;27:69-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612007000500012

Cited by

  1. Comparative study of nutritional composition and color traits of meats obtained from the horses and Korean native black pigs raised in Jeju Island vol.32, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0159
  2. Quality characteristics and flavor compounds of pork meat as a function of carcass quality grade vol.32, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0965
  3. Quality characteristics, fatty acid profiles, flavor compounds and eating quality of cull sow meat in comparison with commercial pork vol.33, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0262