Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative energy content and amino acid digestibility of barley obtained from diverse sources fed to growing pigs

  • Wang, Hong Liang (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Shi, Meng (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Xu, Xiao (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Ma, Xiao Kang (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Ling (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Piao, Xiang Shu (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2016.10.09
  • Accepted : 2016.12.29
  • Published : 2017.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Two experiments were conducted to determine the content of digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) as well as the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) and standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA) in barley grains obtained from Australia, France or Canada. Methods: In Exp. 1, 18 growing barrows ($Duroc{\times}Landrace{\times}Yorkshire$; $31.5{\pm}3.2kg$) were individually placed in stainless-steel metabolism crates ($1.4{\times}0.7{\times}0.6m$) and randomly allotted to 1 of 3 test diets. In Exp. 2, eight crossbred pigs ($30.9{\pm}1.8kg$) were allotted to a replicate $3{\times}4$ Youden Square designed experiment with three periods and four diets. Two pigs received each diet during each test period. The diets included one nitrogen-free diet and three test diets. Results: The relative amounts of gross energy (GE), CP, and all AA in the Canadian barley were higher than those in Australian and French barley while higher concentrations of neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, total dietary fiber, insoluble dietary fiber and ${\beta}-glucan$ as well as lower concentrations of GE and ether extract were observed in the French barley compared with the other two barley sources. The DE and ME as well as the SID of histidine, isoleucine, leucine and phenylalanine in Canadian barley were higher (p<0.05) than those in French barley but did not differ from Australian barley. Conclusion: Differences in the chemical composition, energy content and the SID and AID of AA were observed among barley sources obtained from three countries. The feeding value of barley from Canada and Australia was superior to barley obtained from France which is important information in developing feeding systems for growing pigs where imported grains are used.

Keywords

References

  1. Stein HH, Lagos LV, Casas GA. Nutritional value of feed ingredients of plant origin fed to pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;218:33-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.003
  2. Statista. Global Grain Production from 2008/2009 to 2014/2015 [Internet]. c2015 [cited 2015 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.statista.com/statistics/271943/total-world-grain-production-since-2008-2009/
  3. Stein HH, Kim SW, Nielsen TT, Easter RA. Standardized ileal protein and amino acid digestibility by growing pigs and sows. J Anim Sci 2001;79:2113-22. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7982113x
  4. Pedersen C, Boersma MG, Stein HH. Energy and nutrient digestibility in NutriDense corn and other cereal grains fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2007;85:2473-83. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-620
  5. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
  6. Kong C, Adeola O. Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:917-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.r.02
  7. Ayoade DI, Kiarie E, Neto T, Trinidade Neto MA, Nyachoti CM. Net energy of diets containing wheat-corn distillers dried grains with solubles as determined by indirect calorimetry, comparative slaughter, and chemical composition methods. J Anim Sci 2012;90:4373-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4858
  8. Stein HH, Shipley CF, Easter RA. Technical note: a technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1433-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651433x
  9. Li ZC, Wang XX, Guo PP, et al. Prediction of digestible and metabolisable energy in soybean meals produced from soybeans of different origins fed to growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr 2015;69:473-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2015.1095461
  10. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  11. Xiong Y, Bartle SJ, Preston RL. Improved enzymatic method to measure processing effects and starch availability in sorghum grain. J Anim Sci 1990;68:3861-70. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68113861x
  12. Li QY, Piao XS, Liu JD, et al. Determination and prediction of the energy content and amino acid digestibility of peanut meals fed to growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr 2014;68:196-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2014.910970
  13. Sauvant D, Perez JM, TranG. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pig, poultry, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, and fish. In: Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G, editors. Paris, France: Netherlands and INRA; 2004. pp. 304-9.
  14. Stein HH, Seve B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CF. Invited review: Amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application. J Anim Sci 2007;85:172-80. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-742
  15. Fairbairn SL, Patience JF, Classen HL, Zijlstra RT. The energy content of barley fed to growing pigs: Characterizing the nature of its variability and developing prediction equations for its estimation. J Anim Sci 1999;77:1502-12. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7761502x
  16. Villamide MJ, Fuente JM, de Ayala PP, Flores A. Energy evaluation of eight barley cultivars for poultry: effect of dietary enzyme addition. Poult Sci 1997;76:834-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.6.834
  17. Prandini A, Sigolo S, Giuberti G, et al. Effect of replacing corn with hulled and hulless or low-amylose hulless barley varieties on growth performance and carcass quality of Italian growing-finishing pig. J Anim Sci 2015;93:598-605. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7347
  18. Joven M, Pintos E, Latorre MA, et al. Effect of replacing barley by increasing levels of olive cake in the diet of finishing pigs: Growth performances, digestibility, carcass, meat and fat quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;197:185-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.08.007
  19. Mariscal-Landin G, Rodriguez JEL, de Souza TCR. Evaluation of hulless barley as feed ingredient in growing-finishing pigs diets: amino acid ileal digestibility. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;120:169-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.003
  20. Brestensky M, Nitrayova S, Patras P, Heger J. Standardized ileal digestibilities of amino acids and nitrogen in rye, barley, soybean meal, malt sprouts, sorghum, wheat germ and broken rice fed to growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013;186:120-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.09.006
  21. Wang HL, Shi M, Xu X, et al. Partial dehulling increases the energy content of barley fed to growing pigs and can be comparable to corn. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:562-8.
  22. Fan MZ, Sauer WC. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in barley and canola meal for pigs with the direct, difference, and regression methods. J Anim Sci 1995;73:2364-74. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382364x
  23. Lahaye L, Garnier P, Thibault JN, Seve B. Technological processes of feed manufacturing affect protein endogenous losses and amino acid availability for body protein deposition in pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2004;113:141-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.07.005
  24. Jondreville C, van Den Broecke J, Gatel F, et al. Ileal digestibility of amino acids and estimates of endogenous amino acid losses in pigs fed wheat, triticale, rye, barley, maize and sorghum. Anim Res 2001;50: 119-34. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2001120
  25. Kim JC, Hansen CF, Mullan BP, Pluske JR. Nutrition and pathology of weaner pigs: Nutritional strategies to support barrier function in the gastrointestinal tract. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012; 173:316.
  26. Bach Knudsen KE, Hedemann MS, Lærke HN. The role of carbohydrates in intestinal health of pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012;173: 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.020
  27. Sauer WC, Mosenthin WC, Ahrens F, den Hartog LA. The effect of source of fiber on ileal and fecal amino acid digestibility and bacterial nitrogen excretion in growing pigs. J Anim Sci 1991; 69:4070-4077. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69104070x
  28. Schulze H, van Leeuwen P, Verstegen MW, et al. Effects of level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal apparent digestibility and ileal nitrogen losses in pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:2362-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7292362x
  29. Jondreville C, van Den Broecke J, Delpech A, et al. Factors influencing the ileal digestibility of amino acids from cereals in the pig. Journees Rech Porcine en France 1994;26:251-8.
  30. Mitaru BN, Blair R, Reichert RD, Roe WE. Dark and yellow rapeseed hulls, soybean hulls and a purified fiber source: Their effect on dry matter, energy, protein, and amino acid digestibilities in cannulated pigs. J Anim Sci 1984;59:1510-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5961510x

Cited by

  1. Apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in diverse barley cultivars fed to growing pigs vol.88, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12857
  2. Apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients and the digestible and metabolizable energy values of five unconventional feedstuffs fed to growing pigs vol.47, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1625778
  3. Amino acid digestibility in plant protein sources fed to growing pigs vol.32, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0037