DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Effects of Laser Shock Peening under Initial Tensile Residual Stress Using Numerical Analysis Method

수치해석기법을 이용한 초기 인장잔류응력에 대한 레이저 충격 피닝 효과 분석

  • Kim, Juhee (Department of Mechanical and System Engineering, Korea Military Academy) ;
  • Lee, Jongwoo (Department of Mechanical and System Engineering, Korea Military Academy) ;
  • Yoo, Samhyeun (Department of Mechanical and System Engineering, Korea Military Academy)
  • 김주희 (육군사관학교 기계시스템공학과) ;
  • 이종우 (육군사관학교 기계시스템공학과) ;
  • 유삼현 (육군사관학교 기계시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2017.04.18
  • Accepted : 2017.09.22
  • Published : 2017.10.05

Abstract

In this paper, the effects of parameters related to the residual stress induced due to laser shock peening process to determine mitigation of the initial tensile residual stresses are discussed, such as the maximum pressure, pressure pulse duration, laser spot size and number of laser shots. In order to estimate the influence of the initial tensile residual stresses, which is generated by welding in 35CD4 50HRC steel alloy, the initial condition option was employed in the finite element code. It is found that $2{\times}HEL$ maximum pressure and a certain range of the pressure pulse duration time can produce maximum mitigation effects near the surface and depth, regardless of the magnitudes of tensile residual stess. But plastically affected depth increase with increasing maximum pressure and pressure pulse duration time. For the laser spot size, maximum compressive residual stresses have almost constant values. But LSP is more effective with increasing the magnitudes of tensile residual stress. For the multiple LSP, magnitudes of compressive residual stresses and plastically affected depths are found to increase with increasing number of laser shots, but the effect is less pronounced for more laser shots. And to conclude, even though the initial tensile residual stresses such as weld residual stress field are existed, LSP is enough to make the surface and depth reinforcement effects.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Ding and L. Ye, "Laser Shock Peening Performance and Process Simulation," CRC Press, pp. 47-118, 2006.
  2. K. Ding, and L. Ye, "Simulation of Multiple Laser Shock Peening of a 35CD4 Steel Alloy," J. of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 178, pp. 162-169, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.170
  3. J. E. Masse and G. Barreau, "Laser Generation of Stress Waves in Metal," Surface and Coating Technology, Vol. 70, pp. 231-234, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0257-8972(95)80020-4
  4. LSP Technologies, Inc., "http://www.lsptechnologies.com/tag/f110-engine/," Laser Processing Services and Equipment Design, 2014
  5. J. D, Kim, M. KUTSUNA and Y. SANO, “Laser Peening Process and Its Application Technique,” Journal of Welding and Joining, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1-6, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5781/JWJ.2015.33.4.1
  6. A. Lloyd, "Hacke l : Proc. of SAIL," June 2-4, Williamsburg, US, Paper #sec6-05, 2003.
  7. ABAQUS Version 6.13, User's Manual, Dassault Systemes, 2008.
  8. X. Ling, W. Peng, and G. Ma, “Influence of Laser Peening Parameters on Residual Stress Field of 304 Stainless Steel,” J. of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 130, No. 021120, pp. 1-8, 2008.
  9. B. W. Bang, S. K. Son, J. M. Kim and C. D. Cho, "Residual Stress Prediction in LSP Surface Treatment by Using FEM," KSME-A, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 776-772, 2009.
  10. W. Braisted and R. Brockman, "Finite Element Simulation of Laser Shock Peening," Int. J. of Fatigue, Vol. 21, pp. 719-724, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00035-3
  11. P. Peyre and R. Fabbro, "Laser Shock Processing: A Review of the Physics and Applications," Optical and Quantum Electronics, Vol. 27, pp. 1213-1229, 1995.
  12. P. Peyre, R. Fabbro, P. Merrien and H. P. Lieurade, "Laser Shock Processing of Aluminium Alloys, Application to High Cycle Fatigue Behaviour," Mater. Sci. Eng., A 210, pp. 102-113, 1996.
  13. C. Yang, P. D. Hodgso, Q. Liu and L. Ye, "Geometrical Effects on Residual Stresses in 7050-T7451 Aluminum Alloy Rods Subject to Laser Shock Peening," J. of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 201, pp. 303-309, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.147
  14. R. Fabbro, J. Fournier, P. Ballard and D. Devaux, “Physical Study of Laser Produced Plasma in Confined Geometry,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 775-784, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.346783
  15. Y. Hu, Z. Yao and J. Hu, "3-D FEM Simulation of Laser Shock Processing," Surface & Coating Technology, Vol. 201, pp. 1426-1435, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.02.018
  16. P. Ballard, J. Fournier, R. Fabbro and J. Frelat, "Residual Stresses Induced by Laser-Shocks," J. de Physique IV, Vol. 1, pp. 487-581, 1991.
  17. J. H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. S. Kim, "Effects of Simulation Parameters on Residual Stresses for Laser Shock Peening Finite Element Analysis," J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 27, pp. 2025-2034, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-1263-0
  18. K. Ogawa, D. Deng, S. Kiyoshima, N. Yanagida and K. Saito, "Influences of Heat Source Model on Welding Residual Stress and Distortion in a Multi-Pass J-Groove Joint," J. of Computation Materials Science, Vol. 46, pp. 987-995, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.05.002
  19. D. Rudland, Y. Chen, T. Zhang, G. Wilkowski, J. Broussard and G. White, "Comparison of Welding Residual Stress Solutions for Control Rod Drive Mechanism Nozzles," ASME PVP, 2007-26045, pp. 1-15, 2007.
  20. S. Wu, C. Huang, X. Wang and H. Song, "A New Effective Method to Estimate the Effect of Laser Shock Peening," Int. J. of Impact Engineering, Vol. 38, pp. 322-329, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.11.008