DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Space Planning Guidance about the Temporary Shelter Emphasizing Habitability for Disaster Victims in U.S.

거주성 관점의 미국 이재민 임시대피시설 공간계획 관련 지침분석

  • Received : 2017.08.15
  • Accepted : 2017.09.20
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the information about the disaster temporary shelter space planning guidance described in the U.S. shelter guidelines in terms of the habitability for disaster victims and to address the implications and potential impacts of its findings for the improvement of the shelter design standards and guidelines in Korea. The researchers reviewed four federal and non-governmental organization shelter field and design guidelines and attributes regarding the shelter space planning were classified in accordance with four habitability categories: Safety, Health, Convenience, and Comfort. Three major findings emerged from this study: 1)A total of 72 items about the shelter space planning were extracted from guidelines, and the majority of items are concerned with dormitory areas and sanitary spaces. Other items were about accessibility, children respite care area, signage, health service areas, food preparation and serving areas, parking and drop-off areas, registration and waiting areas, shelter manager and staff areas, lounge and storage areas, and household pets area. 2)Most of these items are strongly related to the convenience category(66.7%), followed by comfort(40.3%), safety(30.6%), and health(25.0%). 3)The habitability of the disaster temporary shelter can be established with considerations on the needs of disaster victims and vulnerable people, minimum occupancy space per person, separate sanitary spaces for the privacy, safe and convenient access routes to the shelter, and the provision of children areas for safety and comfort. The study findings will contribute to the development of the disaster shelter guidelines in Korea by suggesting shelter space planning indicators related to the habitability for the governmental and non-governmental organizations' immediate and systematic responses to the disaster.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립재난안전연구원, 재난유형별 대피소 통합관리 및 대피생활지원 기술개발, 서울: 국립재난안전연구원, 2014
  2. 국민안전처, 국가안전관리기본계획(2015-2019), 세종: 국민안전처, 2015a
  3. 국민안전처, 재해구호계획 수립 지침, 세종: 국민안전처, 2015b
  4. 국토교통과학기술진흥원.인천대, 학교공원,목지시설의 도시방재기능강화를 위한 설계 가이드라인 개발, 2015
  5. 국토교통부, 재난.재해대비 임시거주공간 시스템 개발 최종보고서, 세종: 국토교통부, 2014
  6. 소방방재청, 민방위 사태에 대응한 대피체계 구축 및 대피시설의 운영관리 기술개발, 서울: 소방방재청, 2013
  7. American Red Cross, Mega-shelter planning guide, Washington D.C., U.S.: Author, 2010
  8. FEMA, Design guidance for shelters and safe rooms, Washington D.C., U.S.: Author, 2006
  9. FEMA, Safe rooms for Tornadoes and Hurricanes: Guidance for Community and Residential Safe Room, Washington D.C., U.S.: Author, 2015
  10. FEMA, Safe Rooms for Tornadoes and Hurricanes: Guidance for Community and Residential Safe Rooms, Washington D.C., U.S.: Author, 2000
  11. FEMA, Shelter field guide, Washington D.C., U.S.: Author, 2015
  12. FEMA, Taking Shelter from the Storm: Building a Safe Room for Your Home or Small Business, Washington D.C., U.S.: Author, 1988
  13. Sanderson, D., Burnel, J., Beyond Shelter after Disaster: Practice, Process and Possibilities, NY, Routledge, 2013
  14. Esnard A. M., & Sapat A., Displaced by Disaster: Recovery and Resilience in a Globalizing World. FL, U.S.: CRC Press, 2014
  15. 김미경.김은정, 사용자의 거주성을 고려한 이재민 임시주거시설 현황 분석과 계획적 시사점, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 제25권, 제6호, 2016.12
  16. 김민경.문혁.김혜정.김경숙, 재해재난 시 응급대피공간의 거주계획요소에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집-계획계, 제27권, 제6호, 2011.6
  17. 김소연.박현우.정다운, 홍수 이재민을 위한 유니버설 디자인 가이드라인 연구, 한국디자인문화학회지, 제21권, 제3호, 2015.9
  18. 송재석, 미국의 재난대응 시스템과 프로그램, 허리케인 Katrina로부터의 경험과 정책적 함의, 위기관리이론과 실천, 제3권, 제1호, 2007.6
  19. 염태준.한종훈.박미진.황영삼, 대피학교시설의 설계지침 및 적용에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집-계획계, 제21권, 제10호, 2015.10
  20. 최호택.류상일, 효율적 재난대응을 위한 지방정부 역할 개선방안 -미국, 일본과의 비교를 중심으로-, 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제6권, 제12호, 2006.12
  21. 한국건축가협회.공공봉사위원회, 국가적 재해재난시 응급 주거공간의 최소기준 수립발표, 2011
  22. Bashawri, A., Garrity, S.. & Moodley, K., An overview of the design of disaster relief shelters, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol.18, 2014.9
  23. Beijersbergen, M. D., Asmoredjo, J. K., Christians, M. G., & Wolf, J. R., Psychometric properties of the consumer quality index to assess shelter and community care services, Eur J Public Health, Vol.25, No.3, 2014.6
  24. 국립재난안전포털 http://www.safekorea.go.kr
  25. 박근혜 정부 '재난안전 컨트롤타워' 국민안전처 해체 수순은, 경향신문, 2017.7.21 http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201707211104001&code=910100#csidxea79390a12365b2ba9a68b0c09753cb
  26. 지진대피소 전국에 7천 여 곳 처음으로 지정, 연합뉴스, 2016. 12. 13, http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2016/12/13/0200000000AKR20161213067800004.HTML