DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Drought Stress Influences Photosynthesis and Water Relations Parameters of Synurus deltoides

건조스트레스가 수리취의 광합성 및 수분관련 특성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Kyeong-Cheol (Division of Botanic Research & Management, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Hak Bong (School of Biolgical Sciences and Chemistry, Sungshin Women's University)
  • 이경철 (국립생태원 식물관리연구실) ;
  • 이학봉 (성신여자대학 생물학과)
  • Received : 2017.07.14
  • Accepted : 2017.09.06
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to find out the influence of drought stress on physiological responses of Synurus deltoides. Drought stress was induced by withholding water for 25 days. Leaf water potentials were decreased of both predawn (${\Psi}_{pd}$) and mid-day (${\Psi}_{mid}$) with increasing drought stress, but water saturation dificit (WSD) was 7 times increased. ${\Psi}_{pd}-{\Psi}_{mid}$ showed the significant difference of 0.22~0.18 MPa in stressed before 10 days, and nonsignificant as treatment time became longer. A strong reduction of stomatal conductance ($gH_2O$) and stomatal transpiration rate (E) were observed after 15 days of drought stress Significant reductions of net apparent quantum yield (${\Phi}$) and maximum photosynthesis rate ($Pn_{max}$) were observed after 20 days of drought stress; However, water use efficiency (WUE) was shown the opposite trend. This implies that decrease of photosynthesis rate may be due to an inability to regulate water and $CO_2$ exchanged through the stomata. From JIP analysis, flux ratios (${\Psi}_O$ and ${\Phi}_{EO}$) and performance index on absorption basis ($PI_{ABS}$) were dramatically decreased withholding water after 15 days, which reflects the relative reduction of photosystem II activity. The leaf of S. deltoides showed osmotic adjustment of -0.35 MPa at full turgor and -0.40 MPa at zero turgor, and also cell-wall elastic adjustment of 9.4 MPa, indicating that S. deltoides tolerate drought stress through osmotic adjustment and cell-wall elastic adjustment. The degree of change in water relations parameters such as Vo/DW, Vt/DW decreased with increasing drought stress. This result showed that S. deltoides was exhibited a strong reduction of photosynthetic activity to approximately -0.93 MPa of predawn leaf water potential, and both of osmotic adjustment and cell-wall elastic adjustment in drought stress condition appears to be an important adaptation for restoration in this species.

이 연구는 건조스트레스가 수리취의 생리적 반응에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 수행하였으며, 건조스트레스는 25일 간의 단수처리를 통해 유도하였다. 건조스트레스가 진행됨에 따라 새벽 녘 수분포텐셜(${\Psi}_{pd}$)과 정오의 수분포텐셜(${\Psi}_{mid}$)이 모두 감소하였으며, 수분불포화도(WSD)는 약 7배 증가하였다. 특히 일중 수분포텐셜차(${\Psi}_{pd}-{\Psi}_{mid}$)는 처리 후 10일까지 0.22~0.18 MPa 범위로 큰 차이를 나타냈으나 이후에는 차이가 크게 줄어드는 경향을 보였다. 수리취는 건조스트레스 처리 후 15일부터 기공전도도와 기공증산속도의 감소가 두드러졌고, 처리 20일 이후에는 최대광합성 속도와 순양자수율 역시 큰 폭으로 감소한 반면 수분이용효율은 반대의 경향을 보였다. 이것은 기공을 통한 $CO_2$와 수분의 조절이 원활하지 못해 광합성량의 감소가 일어난 것을 의미한다. JIP 분석을 통해 단수처리 15일 이후에 기능지수($PI_{ABS}$) 및 에너지전달 효율의 감소가 두드러진 것으로 나타났으며, 광계 2의 활성이 감소한 것을 보여준다. 엽의 원형질 분리시 삼투포텐셜 ${\Psi}_o{^{tlp}}$은 -0.4 MPa, 최대포수시의 삼투포텐셜 ${\Psi}_o{^{sat}}$은 -0.35 MPa의 삼투적 적응 반응을 나타냈으며, 최대탄성계수($E_{max}$)의 탄성적 적응은 9.4 MPa로 나타나 수리취는 건조스트레스에 따라 삼투적 적응과 탄성적 적응이 모두 나타나는 것을 알 수 있었다. Vo/DW, Vt/DW와 같은 수분특성인자는 건조스트레스에 따라 증가되는 것으로 나타났다. 결과적으로 수리취는 새벽녘 엽수분포텐셜이 -0.93 MPa 이하로 저하되면 광합성 활성의 감소가 크게 나타나고, 건조스트레스에 따라 삼투적 적응과 탄성적 적응이 나타나 이것이 이 식물의 중요한 적응방법임을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrams, M.D. 1988. Sources of Varistion in Osmotic Potentials with Special Reference to North American Tree Species. Forest Science 34: 1030-1046.
  2. Bargali, K. and Tewari, A. 2004. Growth and Water Relation Parameters in Drought-stressed Coriarianepalensis Seedlings. Journal of Arid Environments 58: 505-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.01.002
  3. Bowman, W.D. and Roberts. S.W. 1985. Seasonal and Diurnal Water Relations Adjustments in Three Evergreen Chaparral Shrubs. Ecology 66: 738-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940534
  4. Cheung, Y.N.S., Tyree, M.T. and Dainty, J. 1975. Water Relation Parameters on Single Leaves Obtained in a Pressure Bomb and Some Ecological Interpretations. Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 1342-1346. https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-162
  5. Choi, J.H. and Kwon, K.W. 2001. Studies on the Shade Tolerance, Light Requirement, and Water Relations of Economic Tree Species(3). Journal of Korean Forest Society 90: 524-534.
  6. Deligoz, A. 2012. Morphological and Physiological Diff Erences Between Bareroot and Container Juniperus Excelsa Seedlings. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 36: 619-628.
  7. Fan, S., Blake, T.J. and Blumwald, E. 1994. The Relative Contribution of Elastic and Osmotic Adjustment to Turgor Maintenance of Woody Plants. Physiologia Plantarum 90: 414-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb00407.x
  8. Han, S.S. 1991. Ecophysiological Interpretations on the Water Relations Parameters of Trees(VI)-diagnosis of Drought Tolerance by the p-v Curves of Twenty Broad Leaved Species-. Journal of Korean Forest Society 80: 210-219.
  9. Hinckley, T.M., Teskey, R.O., Duhme, F. and Richter. H. 1983. Temperate Hardwood Forests. pp. 154-208. In : Kozlowski, T.T. (ed.). Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Vol II, Academic Press. New York, U.S.A.
  10. Holland, V., Koller, S. and Bruggemann, W. 2013. Insight into the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Evergreen and Deciduous European Oaks During Autumn Senescence using OJIP Fluorescence Transient Analysis. Plant Biology 1-8.
  11. Je, S.M., Son, S.G., Woo, S.Y., Byun, K.O. and Kim, C.S. 2006. Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Contents of Chloranthus Glaber under Different Shading Treatments. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 8: 54-60.
  12. Jung, M.J., Heo, S.I. and Wang, M.H. 2008. Antioxidant Activities of Different Parts of Synurus Deltoids Nakai Extracts in Vitro. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology 17: 1156-1159.
  13. Kim, Y.B., An, C.G. and Lee, Y.H. 2000. Effect of Soil Moisture on Quality and Yield in Tomotoes. Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 41: 139-142.
  14. Korea Meteorological Administration. 2017. Integrated Drought Information System. https://drought.kma.go.kr/(2017.07.11).
  15. Kume, A. and Ino, Y. 1993. Comparison of Ecophysiological Response to Heavy Snow in Two Varieties of Acuba Japonica with Different Areas of Distribution. Ecological Reserch 8: 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348523
  16. Kwon, Y.M., Ko, S.C., Kim, J.C., Moon, B.Y., Park, M.C., Park, H.B., Park, I.H., Lee, Y.S., Lee, I.H., Lee, J.S., Lee, J.B., Lee, C.H., Jeon, B.U., Jo, S.H. and Hong, J.B. 2003. Plant Physiology. Academybook. Seoul, pp. 429.
  17. Lee, K.C, Jeon, S.R. and Han, S.S. 2011. Comparison of Water Potential Parameters in Aster Scaber and Synurus deltoides Leaves Obtained from p-v Curves. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 24: 413-418. https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2011.24.4.413
  18. Lee, K.C., Kim, S.H., Park, W.G., and Kim, Y.S. 2014. Effects of Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Capacity and Photosystem II Activity in Oplopanax Elatus. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 22: 38-45. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2014.22.1.38
  19. Lee, W.S.,, Kim, B.S., Kang, S.K., Jeong, S.D. and Hwang, J.M.. 1996. Drought Tolerance of Pepper and Correlations Among WSD, leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Density. Journal of Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 37: 1-4.
  20. Marshall, J.G. and Dumbroff, E.B.. 1999. Turgor Regulation Via Cell Wall Adjustment in White Spruce. Plant Physiology 119: 313-19. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.119.1.313
  21. Marta, P., Dolores, J., Ismael, A., Jaime, P. and Jose, A.P. 2005. Water Relations of Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.) Seedlings in Response to Shading and Moderate Drought. Annals of Forest Science 62: 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005033
  22. Miki, N., Otsuki, K., Nishimoto, K.S.T. and Yoshikawa, K. 2003. Leaf Water Relations in Pinus Densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. on Different Soil Moisture Conditions. Journal of Forest Research 8: 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-002-0021-z
  23. Neil, C.T. 1988. Measurement of Plant Water Status by the Pressure Chamber Technique. Irrigation Science 9: 289-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00296704
  24. Nonami, H. 1998. Plant Water Relations and Control of Cell Elongation at Low Water Potentials. Journal of Plant Research 111: 373-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02507801
  25. Oh, S.J. and Koh, S.C. 2004. Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Antioxidative Enzyme Activity of Crinum Leaves Exposed to Natural Environmental Stress in Winter. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 22: 233-241.
  26. Parker, W.C., Pallardy, S.G., Hinckley, T.M. and Tesky, R.O. 1982. Seasonal Changes in Tissue Water Relations of Three Woody Species of the Quercus-Carya Forest Type. Ecology 63: 1259-1267. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938853
  27. Park, H.J., Son, K.H., Kim, S.W., Chang, H.W., Bae, K.H., Kang, S.S. and Kim, H.P. 2004. Antiinflammatory Activity of Synurus deltoides. Phytotherapy Research 18: 930-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1595
  28. Park, M.H., Choi, B.G., Lim, S.H., Kim, K.H., Heo, N.K., Yu, S.H., Kim, J.D. and Lee, K.J. 2011. Analysis of General Components, Mineral Contents, and Dietary Fiber Contents of Synurus deltoides. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 40: 1631-1634.
  29. Park, S.N. 2009. Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology. 4th ed. Academic Press. California, U.S.A. pp. 604.
  30. Park, Y.M. 1996. Diurnal Changes of Tissue Water Relations in Two Allopatric Tree Species. Korean Journal of Ecology 19: 453-463.
  31. Rathod, D., Brestic, M. and Shao, H. 2011. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Determines the Drought Resistance Capabilities in Two Varieties of Mycorrhized and Non-mycorrhized Glycine max Linn. African Journal of Microbiology Research 5: 4197-4206.
  32. Ritchie, G.A. and Schula, R.G. 1984. Seasonal Changes of Tissue-water Relations in Shoots and Root Systems of Douglas-fir Seedlings. Forest Science 30: 75-71.
  33. Salisbury, F.B. and Ross, C.W. 1992. Plant Physiology, 4th ed. Wadsworth Publishing Company. Belmont, U.S.A. pp. 257.
  34. Strasser, R.J., Srivastava, A. and Tsimilli-Michael, M. 2000. The Fluorescence Transient as a Tool to Characterize and Screen Photosynthetic Samples. pp. 445-483. In : Yunus, M. Pathre, U. and Mohanty, P.(eds.). Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, Regulation and Adaptation. Taylor and Francis. London and New York, U.S.A.
  35. Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. 2006. Plant Physiology. 4th ed. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland. Massachusetts. U.S.A. p. 672-705.
  36. Turnerk, N.C. 1986. Adaptation to water stress : a changing perspective. Functional Plant Biology 13: 175-90.
  37. Tyree, M.T. and Hammel, H.T. 1972. The Measurement of the Turgor Pressure and the Water Relations of Plants by the Pressure-bomb Technique. Journal of Experimental Botany 23: 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/23.1.267
  38. Tyree, M.T., Cheung, Y.N.S., Macgregor, M.E. and Talbit, A.J.B. 1978. The Characteristics of Seasonal and Ontogenetic Changes in the Tissure-water Relations of Acer, Populus, Tsuga, and Picea. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1139/b78-071
  39. Wang, Z., Quebedeaux, B. and Stutte, G.W. 1995. Osmotic Adjustment: Effect of Water Stress on Carbohydrates in Leaves, Stems and Roots of Apple. Functional Plant Biology 22: 747-754.
  40. Wang, Z.X., Chen, L., Ai, J., Qin, H.Y., Liu, Y.X., Xu, P.L., Jiao, Z.Q., Zhao, Y. and Zhang, Q.T. 2012. Photosynthesis and Activity of Photosystem II in Response to Drought Stress in Amur Grape (Vitis Amurensis Rupr.). Photosynthetica 50: 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0023-9
  41. Yu, S.O. and Bae, J.H. 2004. The Effect of Fertigation Setting Point on the Growth and Fruit Quality of Sweet pepper(Capsicum annuum L.). Journal of Bio-Environment Control 13: 102-106.