Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제25권3호
  • /
  • Pages.271-286
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance of moment connections in steel moment frames with HSS columns

  • Nunez, Eduardo (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Chile) ;
  • Torres, Ronald (Materials and Structural Models Institute, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Central de Venezuela) ;
  • Herrera, Ricardo (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Chile)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.06
  • 심사 : 2017.07.01
  • 발행 : 2017.10.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The use of Hollow Structural Sections (HSS) provides an alternative for steel buildings in seismic zones, with the advantage over WF columns that the HSS columns have similar resistance along both axes and enhanced performance under flexure, compression and torsion with respect to other columns sections. The HSS columns have shown satisfactory performance under seismic loads, such as observed in buildings with steel moment frames in the Honshu earthquake (2011). The purpose of this research is to propose a new moment connection, EP-HSS ("End-plate to Hollow Structural Section"), using a wide flange beam and HSS column where the end plate falls outside the range of prequalification established in the ANSI/AISC 358-10 Specification, as an alternative to the traditional configuration of steel moment frames established in current codes. The connection was researched through analytical, numerical (FEM), and experimental studies. The results showed that the EP-HSS allowed the development of inelastic action on the beam only, avoiding stress concentrations in the column and developing significant energy dissipation. The experiments followed the qualification protocols established in the ANSI/AISC 341-10 Specification satisfying the required performance for highly ductile connections in seismic zones, thereby ensuring satisfactory performance under seismic actions without brittle failure mechanisms.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ANSI/AISC 341-10 (2010), Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. ANSI/AISC 358-10 (2010), Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. ANSI/AISC 360-10 (2010), Specification for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  4. ANSYS (2012), ANSYS. Theory reference, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.
  5. Ataollahi, S. and Banan, M. (2016), "Numerical cyclic behavior of T-RBS: A new steel moment connection", Steel Compos. Struct., 21(6), 1251-1264. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.6.1251
  6. Cermelj, B. and Beg, D. (2014), "Cyclic behavior of welded stiffened beam-to-column joints - experimental tests", Steel Constr., 7(4), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201500002
  7. Cermelj, B., Moze, P. and Sinur, F. (2016), "On the prediction of low-cycle fatigue in steel welded beam-to-column joints", J. Constr. Steel Res., 117, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.017
  8. Diaz, C. (2010), "Diseno de uniones semirrigidas mediante simulacion numerica y modelos Kriging", Doctoral Dissertation (in Spanish), Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena, Spain.
  9. Diaz, C., Victoria, M., Marti, P. and Querin, O.M. (2011), "FE model of beam-to-column extended end-plate joints", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(10), 1578-1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.04.002
  10. Esfandyary, R., Razzaghi, M. and Eslami, A. (2015), "A parametric investigation on the hysteretic behavior of CFT column to steel beam connections", Struct. Eng. Mech., 55(1), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.1.205
  11. Fadden, M. (2013), "Cyclic Bending Behavior of Hollow Structural Sections and Their Application in Seismic Moment Frame Systems", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  12. Fadden, M. and McCormick, J. (2014a), "Finite element model of the cyclic bending behavior of hollow structural section beam members", J. Constr. Steel Res., 94, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.10.021
  13. Fadden, M. and McCormick, J. (2014b), "HSS-to-HSS seismic moment connection performance and design", J. Constr. Steel Res., 101, 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.022
  14. Faridmehr, I., Osman, M., Tahir, M., Nejad, A. and Hodjati, R. (2015), "Seismic and progressive collapse assessment of SidePlate moment connection system", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.1.035
  15. FEMA (2000a), "Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings (FEMA-350)", Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  16. FEMA (2000b), "State of the art report on past performance of steel moment-frame buildings in earthquakes (FEMA-355E)", Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  17. Gholami, M., Deylami, A. and Tehranizadeh, M. (2013), "Seismic performance of flange plate connections between steel beams and box columns", J. Constr. Steel Res., 84, 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.11.011
  18. Kim, T.S. and Kuwamura, H. (2007), "Finite element modeling of bolted connections in thin-walled stainless steel plates under static shear", Thin-Walled Struct., 45(4), 407- 421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2007.03.006
  19. Murray, T.M. and Sumner, E.A. (2004), End-Plate Moment Connections - Wind and Seismic Applications, Design Guide Series 4 - 2nd Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL., USA.
  20. Saleh, A., Zahrai, S. and Mirghaderi, S. (2016), "Experimental study on innovative tubular web RBS connections in steel MRFs with typical shallow beams", Struct. Eng. Mech., 57(5), 785-808. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.5.785
  21. Seek, M.W. and Murray, T.M. (2008), "Seismic strength of moment end-plate connections with attached concrete slab",. Proceedings of the Connections VI, Chicago, IL, USA, June.
  22. Swanson J.A. and Leon R.T. (2000), "Bolted steel connections: tests on T-stub components", J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(50)
  23. Swanson, J.A. and Leon, R.T. (2001), "Stiffness modeling of bolted T-stub connection components", J. Struct. Eng,, 127(5), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:5(498)
  24. Tahir, M., Juki, I., Ishak, M. and Plank, R. (2014), "Performance of partial strength connection connected by thick plate between column flanges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.2.215
  25. Yang, C., Yang, J.F., Su, M.S. and Liu, C.Z. (2016), "Numerical study on seismic behaviors of ConXL biaxial moment connection", J. Constr. Steel Res., 121, 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.02.013

피인용 문헌

  1. Novel pin jointed moment connection for cold-formed steel trusses vol.31, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.5.453
  2. Sensitivity analysis to determine seismic retrofitting column location in reinforced concrete buildings vol.78, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.78.1.077
  3. Further study on improvement on strain concentration in through-diaphragm connection vol.39, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.2.135