DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maternal Characteristics, Short Mid-Trimester Cervical Length, and Preterm Delivery

  • Cho, Soo-Hyun (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kyo Hoon (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Eun Young (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Joo, Jung Kyung (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Jang, Ji Ae (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Yoo, Ha-Na (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.09.27
  • Accepted : 2016.12.03
  • Published : 2017.03.10

Abstract

We aimed to determine the maternal characteristics (demographics, an obstetric history, and prior cervical excisional procedure) associated with a short mid-trimester cervical length (CL, defined as a CL of ${\leq}25mm$) and whether having a short cervix explains the association between these maternal characteristics and spontaneous preterm delivery (SPTD, defined as a delivery before 34 weeks). This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of 3,296 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent routine CL measurement between 20 and 24 weeks. Data were collected on maternal age, weight, height, parity, obstetric history (nulliparity; a history of at least 1 SPTD; and at least 1 term birth and no preterm birth [low-risk history group]), and prior cervical excisional procedure. In the multivariate regression analysis, an obstetric history, prior cervical excisional procedure, and gestational age at measurement were the variables significantly associated with short CL. In contrast, maternal weight, height, age, and parity were not significantly associated with short CL. By using the likelihood of SPTD as an outcome variable, logistic regression indicated that short CL and obstetric history, but not prior cervical excisional procedure, were significantly associated with SPTD after adjustment for potential confounders. A history of SPTD and prior cervical excisional procedure were associated with an increased risk of a short mid-trimester CL. A history of SPTD, but not prior cervical excisional procedure, is associated with an increased risk of SPTD, independent of a short CL.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Health and Welfare

References

  1. Robertson PA, Sniderman SH, Laros RK Jr, Cowan R, Heilbron D, Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Creasy RK. Neonatal morbidity according to gestational age and birth weight from five tertiary care centers in the United States, 1983 through 1986. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1629-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91551-K
  2. Callaghan WM, MacDorman MF, Rasmussen SA, Qin C, Lackritz EM. The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1566-73. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0860
  3. Norman JE, Morris C, Chalmers J. The effect of changing patterns of obstetric care in Scotland (1980-2004) on rates of preterm birth and its neonatal consequences: perinatal database study. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000153
  4. Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Hassan S, Erez O, Chaiworapongsa T, Mazor M. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2006; 113 Suppl 3: 17-42.
  5. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 567-72. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199602293340904
  6. Parry S, Simhan H, Elovitz M, Iams J. Universal maternal cervical length screening during the second trimester: pros and cons of a strategy to identify women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 101-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.021
  7. Kuusela P, Jacobsson B, Soderlund M, Bejlum C, Almstrom E, Ladfors L, Hagberg H, Wennerholm UB. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of cervical length in the second trimester of asymptomatic singleton pregnancies, and the risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94: 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12622
  8. van der Ven AJ, van Os MA, Kleinrouweler CE, de Groot CJ, Haak MC, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, Kazemier BM. Is cervical length associated with maternal characteristics? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 188: 12-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.032
  9. Sakai M, Shiozaki A, Tabata M, Sasaki Y, Yoneda S, Arai T, Kato K, Yamakawa Y, Saito S. Evaluation of effectiveness of prophylactic cerclage of a short cervix according to interleukin-8 in cervical mucus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 14-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.014
  10. Facco FL, Simhan HN. Short ultrasonographic cervical length in women with low-risk obstetric history. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 858-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a2dccd
  11. Miller ES, Grobman WA. The association between cervical excisional procedures, midtrimester cervical length, and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 242.e1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.004
  12. Shachar BZ, Mayo JA, Lee HC, Carmichael SL, Stevenson DK, Shaw GM, Gould JB. Effects of race/ethnicity and BMI on the association between height and risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 700.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.005
  13. Beta J, Akolekar R, Ventura W, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from maternal factors, obstetric history and placental perfusion and function at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2662
  14. Torloni MR, Betran AP, Daher S, Widmer M, Dolan SM, Menon R, Bergel E, Allen T, Merialdi M. Maternal BMI and preterm birth: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 22: 957-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767050903042561
  15. Sharashova EE, Anda EE, Grjibovski AM. Early pregnancy body mass index and spontaneous preterm birth in Northwest Russia: a registry-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 303. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-303
  16. Albayrak M, Ozdemir I, Koc O, Coskun E. Can maternal height predict shorter cervical length in asymptomatic low-risk pregnant women? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 157: 161-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.021
  17. Poon LC, Savvas M, Zamblera D, Skyfta E, Nicolaides KH. Large loop excision of transformation zone and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. BJOG 2012; 119: 692-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03203.x
  18. Suh YH, Park KH, Hong JS, Noh JH. Prediction of prolonged pregnancy in nulliparous women by transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length at 20-24 weeks and 37 weeks. J Korean Med Sci 2007; 22: 89-93. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2007.22.1.89
  19. Jin G, LanLan Z, Li C, Dan Z. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289: 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2955-0
  20. Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, Quinn M. Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth. BJOG 2007; 114: 70-80.
  21. Andia D, Mozo de Rosales F, Villasante A, Rivero B, Diez J, Perez C. Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 112: 225-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.015
  22. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Novakov A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 304-11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050304.x
  23. Miller ES, Tita AT, Grobman WA. Second-trimester cervical length screening among asymptomatic women: an evaluation of risk-based strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 61-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000864
  24. Orzechowski KM, Boelig R, Nicholas SS, Baxter J, Berghella V. Is universal cervical length screening indicated in women with prior term birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 234.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.029
  25. Miller ES, Sakowicz A, Grobman WA. The association between cervical dysplasia, a short cervix, and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 543.e1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.036
  26. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, Berghella V, Sheffield JS, Perez-Delboy A, Egerman RS, Wing DA, Tomlinson M, Silver R, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 375.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.015
  27. Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Michalitsi V, Papadopoulos GK, Kassanos D. A predictive model of short cervix at 20-24 weeks using first-trimester cervical length measurement and maternal history. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 202-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2683
  28. Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH; Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 462-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067815
  29. Moroz LA, Simhan HN. Rate of sonographic cervical shortening and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 234.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.11.017
  30. Temming LA, Durst JK, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Dicke JM, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Universal cervical length screening: implementation and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 523.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.002
  31. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 964-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b
  32. Iams JD. Clinical practice. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 254-61. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1103640

Cited by

  1. Short cervical lengths initially detected in mid-trimester and early in the third trimester in asymptomatic twin gestations: Association with histologic chorioamnionitis and preterm birth vol.12, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175455
  2. Complement C3a, But Not C5a, Levels in Amniotic Fluid Are Associated with Intra-amniotic Infection and/or Inflammation and Preterm Delivery in Women with Cervical Insufficiency or an Asymptomatic Shor vol.33, pp.35, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e220
  3. Artificial Neural Network Analysis of Spontaneous Preterm Labor and Birth and Its Major Determinants vol.34, pp.16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e128
  4. Addition of Cervical Elastography May Increase Preterm Delivery Prediction Performance in Pregnant Women with Short Cervix: a Prospective Study vol.34, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e68
  5. Spontaneous preterm birth and cervical length in a pregnant Asian population vol.15, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230125
  6. Women's Obstetric History and Midtrimester Cervical Length Measurements by 2D/3D and Doppler Ultrasound vol.42, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713010
  7. Impact of cervical length on preterm birth in northern China: a prospective cohort study vol.33, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1570116
  8. The impact of preconception body mass index on cervical length: a prospective cohort study in China vol.34, pp.24, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1704245