DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Myocardial Bridge by Cardiac CT: Intracoronary Transluminal Attenuation Gradient Derived from Diastolic Phase Predicts Systolic Compression

  • Yu, Mengmeng (Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital) ;
  • Zhang, Yang (Department of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Pharmacy, The Second Military Medical University) ;
  • Li, Yuehua (Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital) ;
  • Li, Minghua (Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital) ;
  • Li, Wenbin (Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital) ;
  • Zhang, Jiayin (Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.13
  • 심사 : 2017.01.25
  • 발행 : 2017.08.01

초록

Objective: To study the predictive value of transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG) derived from diastolic phase of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for identifying systolic compression of myocardial bridge (MB). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with MB based on CCTA findings and without obstructive coronary artery disease were retrospectively enrolled. In total, 143 patients with 144 MBs were included in the study. Patients were classified into three groups: without systolic compression, with systolic compression < 50%, and with systolic compression ${\geq}50%$. TAG was defined as the linear regression coefficient between intraluminal attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU) and length from the vessel ostium. Other indices such as the length and depth of the MB were also recorded. Results: TAG was the lowest in MB patients with systolic compression ${\geq}50%$ ($-19.9{\pm}8.7HU/10mm$). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff values for identifying systolic compression ${\geq}50%$. The result indicated an optimal cutoff value of TAG as -18.8 HU/10 mm (area under curve = 0.778, p < 0.001), which yielded higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy (54.1, 80.5, 72.8, and 75.0%, respectively). In addition, the TAG of MB with diastolic compression was significantly lower than the TAG of MB without diastolic compression ($-21.4{\pm}4.8HU/10mm$ vs. $-12.7{\pm}8HU/10mm$, p < 0.001). Conclusion: TAG was a better predictor of MB with systolic compression ${\geq}50%$, compared to the length or depth of the MB. The TAG of MB with persistent diastolic compression was significantly lower than the TAG without diastolic compression.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine

참고문헌

  1. Mohlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, Erbel R. Update on myocardial bridging. Circulation 2002;106:2616-2622 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000038420.14867.7A
  2. Akdemir R, Gunduz H, Emiroglu Y, Uyan C. Myocardial bridging as a cause of acute myocardial infarction: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2002;2:15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-2-15
  3. Kim SS, Jeong MH, Kim HK, Kim MC, Cho KH, Lee MG, et al. Long-term clinical course of patients with isolated myocardial bridge. Circ J 2010;74:538-543 https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0648
  4. Gowda RM, Khan IA, Ansari AW, Cohen RA. Acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction from myocardial bridging of left anterior descending coronary artery. Int J Cardiol 2003;90:117-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5273(02)00518-1
  5. Nakanishi R, Rajani R, Ishikawa Y, Ishii T, Berman DS. Myocardial bridging on coronary CTA: an innocent bystander or a culprit in myocardial infarction? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:3-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.10.015
  6. Gawor R, Kusmierek J, Plachcinska A, Bienkiewicz M, Drozdz J, Piotrowski G, et al. Myocardial perfusion GSPECT imaging in patients with myocardial bridging. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:1059-1065 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9406-8
  7. Lee YS, Moon DH, Shin JW, Park SW, Park SJ, Lee HK. Dipyridamole TI-201 SPECT imaging in patients with myocardial bridging. Clin Nucl Med 1999;24:759-764 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-199910000-00006
  8. Hwang JH, Ko SM, Roh HG, Song MG, Shin JK, Chee HK, et al. Myocardial bridging of the left anterior descending coronary artery: depiction rate and morphologic features by dual-source CT coronary angiography. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:514-521 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.5.514
  9. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Matsuura N, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008;248:424-430 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2482071804
  10. Leschka S, Koepfli P, Husmann L, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Gaemperli O, et al. Myocardial bridging: depiction rate and morphology at CT coronary angiography--comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Radiology 2008;246:754-762 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2463062071
  11. Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Shen Y, Ishikawa T, Tate E, et al. Current and novel imaging techniques in coronary CT. Radiographics 2015;35:991-1010 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140181
  12. Bourassa MG, Butnaru A, Lesperance J, Tardif JC. Symptomatic myocardial bridges: overview of ischemic mechanisms and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:351-359
  13. Steigner ML, Mitsouras D, Whitmore AG, Otero HJ, Wang C, Buckley O, et al. Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:179-186 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.854307
  14. Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM, Lin FY, Mendoza DD, Shin DH, et al. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:1149-1157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.006
  15. Kim PJ, Hur G, Kim SY, Namgung J, Hong SW, Kim YH, et al. Frequency of myocardial bridges and dynamic compression of epicardial coronary arteries: a comparison between computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography. Circulation 2009;119:1408-1416 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788901
  16. Kramer JR, Kitazume H, Proudfit WL, Sones FM Jr. Clinical significance of isolated coronary bridges: benign and frequent condition involving the left anterior descending artery. Am Heart J 1982;103:283-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(82)90500-2
  17. Schwarz ER, Gupta R, Haager PK, vom Dahl J, Klues HG, Minartz J, et al. Myocardial bridging in absence of coronary artery disease: proposal of a new classification based on clinical-angiographic data and long-term follow-up. Cardiology 2009;112:13-21 https://doi.org/10.1159/000137693
  18. Ishikawa Y, Akasaka Y, Suzuki K, Fujiwara M, Ogawa T, Yamazaki K, et al. Anatomic properties of myocardial bridge predisposing to myocardial infarction. Circulation 2009;120:376-383 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820720
  19. Kim YJ, Yong HS, Kim SM, Kim JA, Yang DH, Hong YJ, et al. Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:251-285 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.251
  20. Hwang D, Lee JM, Koo BK. Physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease: focus on fractional flow reserve. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:307-320 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.307
  21. Corban MT, Hung OY, Eshtehardi P, Rasoul-Arzrumly E, McDaniel M, Mekonnen G, et al. Myocardial bridging: contemporary understanding of pathophysiology with implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2346-2355 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.049
  22. Herrmann J, Higano ST, Lenon RJ, Rihal CS, Lerman A. Myocardial bridging is associated with alteration in coronary vasoreactivity. Eur Heart J 2004;25:2134-2142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.08.015
  23. Soran O, Pamir G, Erol C, Kocakavak C, Sabah I. The incidence and significance of myocardial bridge in a prospectively defined population of patients undergoing coronary angiography for chest pain. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2000;25:57-60
  24. Uusitalo V, Saraste A, Pietila M, Kajander S, Bax JJ, Knuuti J. The functional effects of intramural course of coronary arteries and its relation to coronary atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:697-704 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.001
  25. Sun Z, Ng KH. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: a systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e94-e100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.070
  26. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, Meredith IT, Leong DP, Antonis PR, et al. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:1097-1111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004
  27. Park EA, Lee W, Park SJ, Kim YK, Hwang HY. Influence of coronary artery diameter on intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient during CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:1074-1083 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.028

피인용 문헌

  1. Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals vol.19, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1172
  2. Coronary spasm: It’s common, but it’s still unsolved vol.10, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v10.i11.201
  3. Myocardial bridge-related coronary heart disease: Independent influencing factors and their predicting value vol.7, pp.15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i15.1986
  4. Myocardial bridge characteristics and coronary atherosclerotic markers vol.61, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.33678/cor.2019.005
  5. CT Fractional Flow Reserve for the Diagnosis of Myocardial Bridging-Related Ischemia: A Study Using Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as a Reference Standard vol.22, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0043