Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in Characteristics of Mentor Interaction in Collaborative Mentoring

협력적 멘토링에서 나타나는 멘토의 상호작용 특징 변화

  • Park, Jihun (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Eunjee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Seonwoo (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
  • 박지훈 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 손은지 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 이선우 (부산대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 남정희 (부산대학교 화학교육과)
  • Received : 2016.11.08
  • Accepted : 2017.07.23
  • Published : 2017.10.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate characteristics of interaction in mentoring conversations and to examine how the interaction features change as mentor teachers have more mentoring experiences. Participants of this study were three mentor who have over 17 years' teaching experience and six beginning science teachers. For this study, one-to-one mentoring dialogue recordings and transcripts were collected and the dialogues were analyzed by utilizing an analytical framework of interaction. the result of analyzing characteristics of mentors' interaction shows that mentors used simple questions and support the most when they started mentoring conversation. the change of characteristics of mentor's interactions indicates three mentors tended to use more thought-provoking questions in the $2^{nd}$ year mentoring than in the $1^{st}$ year and as a result of it mentee's reflection and reflective practices were increased. Through mentors' interview, the mentors could have the opportunity to reflect their own mentoring and this means mentors' self reflection was provoked by means of the mentoring program.

이 연구에서는 협력적 멘토링에서 나타나는 멘토의 상호작용 특징과 멘토의 멘토링 경험에 따른 상호작용 특징의 변화에 대하여 알아보았다. 연구참여자는 교직경력 17년 이상의 멘토 3명과 초임중등과학교사 6명을 선정하였다. 일대일 멘토링 대화 녹음본 및 전사본을 수집하였고 이를 상호작용 분석틀을 이용하여 분석하였다. 협력적 멘토링 과정에서 나타나는 멘토의 상호작용의 특징을 분석 결과, 대체로 멘토들은 대화를 시작할 때 지원과 단순질문의 방법을 가장 많이 쓰고 있었다. 협력적 멘토링 과정에서 나타나는 멘토의 상호작용의 특징 변화를 보면, 멘토 3명의 멘토링 대화에서 대체로 1년차 멘토링에 비해 2년차 멘토링에서 사고질문이 많아졌으며, 이로 인하여 멘티의 반성 및 반성적 실천이 나타난 비율이 높아졌다. 멘토 인터뷰를 통하여 멘토들은 자신의 멘토링이나 멘티의 수업 변화를 보고 자신의 멘토링을 돌아보는 모습을 보였으며 이는 멘토링 프로그램을 통하여 멘토의 반성이 일어났음을 확인할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Park, Y.; Eun, J. Social Studies Education 2011, 50, 49.
  2. Bianchini, A.; Solomon, M. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2003, 40, 53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10060
  3. Go, M.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2010, 33, 94.
  4. Go, M.; Lee, S.; Choi, J.; Nam, J. The Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2009, 29, 564.
  5. Luft, J. A. International Journal of Science Education 2009, 31, 2355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802369367
  6. Nam, J.; Lee, S.; Lim, J.; Moon, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2010, 30, 953.
  7. Appleton, K.; Kindt, I. International Journal of Science Education 1999, 21, 155. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290769
  8. Zanting, A.; Verloop, N.; Vermunt, J. D.; Van Driel, J. H. European Journal of Teacher Education 1998, 21, 11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976980210104
  9. Guskey, T. R. Journal of Staff Development 1994, 15, 42.
  10. O'Conner, C. L.; Ertmer, P. A. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 2006, 10, 97.
  11. Feiman-Nemser, S.; Parker, M. B. International Journal of Educational Research 1993, 19, 699. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(93)90010-H
  12. Huling-Austin, L. Handbook of Research in Teacher Education; Macmilln; New York, U.S.A., 1990.
  13. Joe, H.; Kim, H. Journal of Future Early Childhood Education 2005, 12, 227.
  14. Kim, H.; Kim, H.; Yang, M. Journal of Young Child Studies 2007, 10, 103.
  15. Odell, S. J.; Ferraw, D. P. Journal of Teacher Eduction 1992, 43, 200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487192043003006
  16. Park, H.; Seong, S.; Jeong, D. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2011, 31, 1055.
  17. Choi, J. The Effects of Teacher's Reflection Thinking for Teaching on Teaching Behavior. Ph.D. Thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, Korea, 1996.
  18. Jo, S. Changes in Physical Education Teaching Behaviors Elementary School Teachers Through Reflection. ph. D. Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, 1998.
  19. Lee, J. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 2002, 19, 169.
  20. Porter, A. C.; Youngs, P.; Odden, A. Advane in Teacher Assessments and Their Uses. In Handbook of research on teaching; Richardson, V. Ed.; AERA: Washington, DC; pp 259-297.
  21. Choi, S.; Kwon, J.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2014, 58, 638. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.6.638
  22. Malderez, A.; Bodoczky, C. Mentor Courses: A Resource Book for Trainertrainers; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1999.
  23. Bradbury, L. U.; Koballa, T. R. Teaching and Teacher Education 2008, 24, 2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.03.002
  24. Nam, J.; Ko, M.; Lee, S.; Go, M.; Sung, H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2012, 32, 1613.
  25. Friedrichsen, P.; Chval, K. B.; Teuscher, D. School Science and Mathematics 2007, 107, 169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17781.x
  26. Lee, S. Analysis of the Effect on Collaborative Mentoring Program for Development of Mentor Standards in Secondary Science Teaching. Ph. D. Thesis, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea, 2015.
  27. Feiman-Nemser, S. Teachers College Record 2001, 103, 1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141
  28. Bullough, R. V. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2005, 21, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.002

Cited by

  1. 초임 과학 교사에 대한 멘토링 효과 지속에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색 vol.64, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.6.401
  2. 인성 중심 교수 모형에 대한 이해와 실천이 예비 중등 과학교사의 인성 교육에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향 분석 vol.65, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2021.65.4.279