Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Programming-Based Lessons on Science Teachers' Perceptions Related to TPACK

프로그래밍 기반 수업이 과학교사의 TPACK에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2017.05.25
  • Accepted : 2017.07.20
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, 37 elementary, middle, and high school science teachers attending graduate schools of education were surveyed about their thoughts about the difficulty of teaching science units and teaching methods to teach these units to students. After experiencing the activity of making new teaching tools using scratch, we tried to confirm the development of TPACK among the teachers. Through the questionnaire survey for elementary, secondary, and high school science teachers, we selected the unit of Planetary Movement of the Solar System as a unit that is difficult for teachers to teach. We gave them the experience of instruction on tool making process for implementing a planetary operation model using scratch. Then, based on the questionnaires and class presentations, we analyzed the change of awareness about technology introduction and the development of their TPACK. As a result, most of the teachers showed changes of perceptions related to TK, TCK, TPK; the use of programming for creating teaching materials enhances teachers' understanding of the teaching contents; the teachers were convinced that students would develop the ability to construct models that fit observational phenomena; they thought that there would be a positive educational effect in the positive domain.

이 연구에서는 교육대학원에 재학하는 37명의 초등, 중등, 고등학교 과학교사들을 대상으로 기존의 과학수업에서 가르치기 어려운 단원과 기존의 교수법에 대해 조사한 후에, 스크래치를 이용한 새로운 교수 자료를 제작하는 활동을 체험하도록 하고, 이러한 과정을 통해 새로운 수업전문성인 TPACK의 발달을 확인하고자 하였다. 설문을 통해 초등, 중등, 고등학교 과학교사들이 공통적으로 가르치기 어려운 단원으로 선정된 태양계의 행성운동 내용을 중심으로 스크래치를 활용한 천동설과 지동설 행성 운행 모델을 구현하는 경험을 하도록 하였다. 그 후 설문조사와 수업 발표를 토대로 테크놀로지의 수업도입에 대한 인식 변화 및 TPACK의 발달을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 대부분의 교사들의 TK, TCK, TPK 등에 대한 인식의 변화를 보였으며, 프로그래밍을 활용한 교수 자료 제작이 교사들의 내용에 대한 이해를 높여주고, 학생들에게 관찰 현상에 맞는 모델 구성 능력을 길러주며, 정의적 영역에서도 긍정적인 교육효과가 있을 것이라고 생각하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). ICT-related pedagogical content knowledge. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference(pp. 3030-3037). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK. Computers & Education, 52, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  3. Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811-831. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310805
  4. Barnett, M., & Morran, J. (2002). Addressing children's understanding of the Moon's phases and eclipses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 859-879. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095276
  5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  6. Carlsen, W. S. (1998). The effects of science teacher subject-matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, CA: Stanford University Press.
  7. Carlsen, W. S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27, 15-21.
  8. Cho, S. H. (1993). Meaning of knowledge and education, Philosophy of Education, 11, 225-240.
  9. Flick, L., & Bell, R. (2000). Preparing tomorrow's science teachers to use technology: guidelines for Science educators. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1, 39-60.
  10. Dixon. J. K. (1997). Computer use and visualization in students' construction of reflection and rotation concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 97(7), 352-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17376.x
  11. Guerrero, S. (2005). Teacher knowledge and a new domain of expertise. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.2190/BLQ7-AT6T-2X81-D3J9
  12. Han, I. S., Eom, M. R., & Shin, W. S. (2013). Multimedia case-based learning to enhance pre-service teachers' knowledge integration for teaching with technologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.006
  13. Han, S. K. (1991). A Study on Belief-condition for Knowledge, The Society of Eastern Philosophy, 8(1), 319-337.
  14. Hannum, W. H., & McCombs, B. L. (2008). Enhancing distance learning for today's youth with learner-centered principles. Educational Technology, 48(3), 11-21.
  15. Harper, D. (2003). Students as change agents. In M. S. Khine, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-rich Learning Environments: A Future Perspective (pp. 307-329). Singapore: World Scientific.
  16. Harper, D., & Martinez, S. (2008). Working with tech-savvy kids. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 64-69.
  17. Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(87)90012-6
  18. Higgins, T. E., & Spitulnik, M. W. (2008). Supporting teachers' use of technology in science instruction through professional development: a literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 511-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9118-2
  19. Hu, R. D., Wu, Y. Y., & Shieh, C. J. (2015). Effects of virtual reality integrated creative thinking instruction on students' creative thinking abilities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 477-486
  20. Jho, H. (2013). Philosophical discourse on science education with a focus on socio-scientific issues. Humanities Research, 38, 339-359.
  21. Jonassen, D. (1991). Objectivism vs. constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296434
  22. Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.
  23. Kang, K. (2015). The exploration of the origin, transition, background, and identity of STEAM education. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 14(2), 5-29.
  24. Kelly, M. G. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Washington DC.: International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, OR.
  25. Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 91(6), 1010-1030.
  26. Kim, W., Sung, J. (2009). Fundamental limits and challenges of creative talent development. STEPI Insight, vol. 32.
  27. Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation (2013). OECD International study achievement research: PISA 2012 result report. Research Paper RRE-2013-6-1.
  28. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in interfacing technology into teaching and learning: knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers, Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921
  29. Lee, H., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20304
  30. Lee, J. (2015). International comparative study of the use of ICT by middle school teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 85-893. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0085
  31. Llorens, S., Salanova, M., & Grau, R. (2002). Training to technological change, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782380
  32. Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2003). Teacher knowledge of educational technology. In Y. Zhao (ed.) What Should Teachers Know about Technology? Perspectives and Practices (pp. 123-159). Greenwich, Co.: Information Age Publishing.
  33. McCombs, B. L., & Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learing. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1582-1600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00534.x
  34. Min, H. (2012). Development of assessment expertise model through assessment and teacher training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk.
  35. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  36. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1-16.
  37. Mistler, J. M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and internet technology: are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 459-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<459::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-C
  38. Murphy, E. (1997). Constructivism: From philosophy to practice. http://www.cdli.ca/-elmurphy/emurphy/cle.html. Accessed 11.08.08.
  39. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  40. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  41. Niess, M. L. (2015). Transforming teacher's knowledge: Learning trajectories for advancing teacher education for teaching with technology. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, pp. 19-37, New York, NY: Springer.
  42. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
  43. Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promises, problems and future directions. Report 6. Retrieved November 2010, from. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/04/41/PDF/osborne-j-2003-r6.pdf.
  44. Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (1998). The earth and beyond: developing primary teachers' understanding of basic astronomical events. Intranational Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 503-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200501
  45. Pierson, E. M. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(4), 413-430.
  46. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
  47. Richard, A., Heidi, A., Schweingruber, Andrew, W., & Shouse, Editors. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8, The National Academies.
  48. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177234
  49. Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers' knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 723-736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300710
  50. Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: creating student-centered classroom. NY: Teachers College Press.
  51. Schmit, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2014). Technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
  52. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Edu Res, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
  53. Song, J., & Na, J. (2015). Directions and issues of 2015 national science curriculum and their implications to science classroom culture. On-site science education, 9(2), 72-84.
  54. Stahly, L. L., Krockover, G. H., & Shepardson, D. P. (1999). Third grade students' ideas about the lunar phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<159::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-Y
  55. Stronge, J. H. (2010). Assessing teacher effectiveness: Eight research-based standards for assessing teacher excellence. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
  56. Wang, T. (2009). Rethinking teaching with information and communication technologies(ICTs) in architectural education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1132-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.007
  57. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008a). Distributed cognition in a sixth-grade classroom: An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions about light and color. Journal of Research Technology Education, 40(3), 309-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782510
  58. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008b). Professional development for computer-enhanced learning: a case study with science teachers. Research of Science, Technology, and Education, 26(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701847397
  59. Varma, K., Husic, F., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Targeted support for using technology-enhanced science inquiry models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9104-8
  60. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  61. Yuk, G., & Lee, G. (1997). A study on improvement of science education in elementary, middle and high school. Policy Research, 1-251.