Membrane and Water Treatment

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seawater-driven forward osmosis for direct treatment of municipal wastewater

  • Sun, Yan (State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Bai, Yang (State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Tian, Jiayu (State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Gao, Shanshan (State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology) ;
  • Zhao, Zhiwei (Department of National Defense Construction Planning and Environmental Engineering, Logistical Engineering University) ;
  • Cui, Fuyi (State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2016.06.02
  • Accepted : 2017.05.13
  • Published : 2017.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Direct treatment of municipal wastewater by forward osmosis (FO) process was evaluated in terms of water flux decline, reverse salt diffusion, pollutants rejection and concentration efficiency by using synthetic seawater as the draw solution. It was found that when operating in PRO mode (active layer facing the draw solution), although the FO membrane exhibited higher osmotic water flux, more severe flux decline and reverse salt diffusion was also observed due to the more severe fouling of pollutants in the membrane support layer and accompanied fouling enhanced concentration polarization. In addition, although the water flux decline was shown to be lower for the FO mode (active layer facing the feed solution), irreversible membrane fouling was identified in both PRO and FO modes as the water flux cannot be restored to the initial value by physical flushing, highlighting the necessity of chemical cleaning in long-term operation. During the 7 cycles of filtration conducted in the experiments, the FO membrane exhibited considerably high rejection for TOC, COD, TP and $NH_4{^+}-N$ present in the wastewater. By optimizing the volume ratio of seawater draw solution/wastewater feed solution, a concentration factor of 3.1 and 3.7 was obtained for the FO and PRO modes, respectively. The results demonstrated the validity of the FO process for direct treatment of municipal wastewater by using seawater as the draw solution, while facilitating the subsequent utilization of concentrated wastewater for bioenergy production, which may have special implications for the coastline areas.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Aydiner, C. (2015), "A model-based analysis of water transport dynamics and fouling behaviors of osmotic membrane", Chem. Eng. J., 266, 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.098
  2. Boo, C., Elimelech, M. and Hong, S. (2013), "Fouling control in a forward osmosis process integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation", J. Membr. Sci., 444, 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.004
  3. Boo, C., Lee, S., Elimelech, M., Meng, Z. and Hong, S. (2012), "Colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: Role of reverse salt diffusion", J. Membr. Sci., 390-391, 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.001
  4. CEPB (2002), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Chinese Environmental Science Press.
  5. Cui, Y., Ge, Q., Liu, X.Y. and Chung, T.S. (2014), "Novel forward osmosis process to effectively remove heavy metal ions", J. Membr. Sci., 467, 188-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.034
  6. Cui, Y., Liu, X.Y., Chung, T.S., Weber, M., Staudt, C. and Maletzko, C. (2016), "Removal of organic micropollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO)", Water Res., 91, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.001
  7. Do, V.T., Tang, C.Y., Reinhard, M. and Leckie, J.O. (2012), "Effects of hypochlorous acid exposure on the rejection of salt, polyethylene glycols, boron and arsenic(V) by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes", Water Res., 46(16), 5217-5223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.044
  8. Dong, Y., Wang, Z., Zhu, C., Wang, Q., Tang, J. and Wu, Z. (2014), "A forward osmosis membrane system for the post-treatment of MBR-treated landfill leachate", J. Membr. Sci., 471, 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.023
  9. Elimelech, M. and Phillip, W.A. (2011), "The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment", Sci., 333, 712-717. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200488
  10. Hickenbottom, K.L., Hancock, N.T., Hutchings, N.R., Appleton, E.W., Beaudry, E.G., Xu, P. and Cath, T.Y. (2013), "Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations", Desalination, 312, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.037
  11. Kong, F.X., Yang, H.W., Wu, Y.Q., Wang, X.M. and Xie, Y.F. (2015), "Rejection of pharmaceuticals during forward osmosis and prediction by using the solution-diffusion model", J. Membr. Sci., 476, 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.026
  12. Liu, X., Qi, S., Li, Y., Yang, L., Cao, B. and Tang, C.Y. (2013), "Synthesis and characterization of novel antibacterial silver nanocomposite nanofiltration and forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly", Water Res., 47(9), 3081-3092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.018
  13. McCutcheon, J.R. and Elimelech, M. (2006), "Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis", J. Membr. Sci., 284(1-2), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049
  14. Motsa, M.M., Mamba, B.B., D'Haese, A., Hoek, E.M.V. and Verliefde, A.R.D. (2014), "Organic fouling in forward osmosis membranes: The role of feed solution chemistry and membrane structural properties", J. Membr. Sci., 460, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.035
  15. Phuntsho, S., Sahebi, S., Majeed, T., Lotfi, F., Kim, J.E. and Shon, H.K. (2013), "Assessing the major factors affecting the performances of forward osmosis and its implications on the desalination process", Chem. Eng. J., 231, 484-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.058
  16. Qi, S., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, W. and Tang, C.Y. (2015), "Highly efficient forward osmosis based on porous membranes--applications and implications", Environ. Sci. Technol., 49(7), 4690-4695. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504164w
  17. Razmjou, A., Simon, G.P. and Wang, H. (2013), "Effect of particle size on the performance of forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent", Chem. Eng. J., 215-216, 913-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.088
  18. Shaffer, D.L., Arias Chavez, L.H., Ben-Sasson, M., Romero-Vargas Castrillon, S., Yip, N.Y. and Elimelech, M. (2013), "Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions", Environ. Sci. Technol., 47(17), 9569-9583. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401966e
  19. Shaffer, D.L., Werber, J.R., Jaramillo, H., Lin, S. and Elimelech, M. (2015), "Forward osmosis: Where are we now?", Desalination, 356, 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.031
  20. She, Q., Jin, X., Li, Q. and Tang, C.Y. (2012), "Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes", Water Res., 46(7), 2478-2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.024
  21. Sun, Y., Tian, J., Zhao, Z., Shi, W., Liu, D. and Cui, F. (2016), "Membrane fouling of forward osmosis (FO) membrane for municipal wastewater treatment: A comparison between direct FO and OMBR", Water Res., 104, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.039
  22. Tian, J.-y., Ernst, M., Cui, F. and Jekel, M. (2013), "Effect of different cations on UF membrane fouling by NOM fractions", Chem. Eng. J., 223, 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.043
  23. Valladares Linares, R., Li, Z., Abu-Ghdaib, M., Wei, C.H., Amy, G. and Vrouwenvelder, J.S. (2013), "Water harvesting from municipal wastewater via osmotic gradient: An evaluation of process performance", J. Membr. Sci., 447, 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.018
  24. Valladares Linares, R., Yangali-Quintanilla, V., Li, Z. and Amy, G. (2012), "NOM and TEP fouling of a forward osmosis (FO) membrane: Foulant identification and cleaning", J. Membr. Sci., 421-422, 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.019
  25. Wang, Z., Tang, J., Zhu, C., Dong, Y., Wang, Q. and Wu, Z. (2015), "Chemical cleaning protocols for thin film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes used for municipal wastewater treatment", J. Membr. Sci., 475, 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.032
  26. Widjojo, N., Chung, T.-S., Weber, M., Maletzko, C. and Warzelhan, V. (2013), "A sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as the supporting substrate in thin film composite (TFC) membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis (FO)", Chem. Eng. J., 220, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.007
  27. Wu, Y., Xia, S., Dong, B., Chu, H. and Liu, J. (2013), "Study on surface water treatment by hybrid sand filtration and nanofiltration", Desalin. Water Treat., 51(25-27), 5327-5336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.768795
  28. Xia, S., Yao, L., Yang, R. and Zhou, Y. (2015), "Organic fouling in forward osmosis (FO): Membrane flux behavior and foulant quantification", Membr. Water Treat., 6(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2015.6.2.161
  29. Xue, W., Tobino, T., Nakajima, F. and Yamamoto, K. (2015), "Seawater-driven forward osmosis for enriching nitrogen and phosphorous in treated municipal wastewater: effect of membrane properties and feed solution chemistry", Water Res., 69, 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.007
  30. Xue, W., Yamamoto, K. and Tobino, T. (2016), "Membrane fouling and long-term performance of seawaterdriven forward osmosis for enrichment of nutrients in treated municipal wastewater", J. Membr. Sci., 499, 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.009
  31. Zhang, H., Cheng, S. and Yang, F. (2014a), "Use of a spacer to mitigate concentration polarization during forward osmosis process", Desalination, 347, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.026
  32. Zhang, H., Li, J., Cui, H., Li, H. and Yang, F. (2015), "Forward osmosis using electric-responsive polymer hydrogels as draw agents: Influence of freezing-thawing cycles, voltage, feed solutions on process performance", Chem. Eng. J., 259, 814-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.065
  33. Zhang, H., Ma, Y., Jiang, T., Zhang, G. and Yang, F. (2012a), "Influence of activated sludge properties on flux behavior in osmosis membrane bioreactor (OMBR)", J. Membr. Sci., 390-391, 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.048
  34. Zhang, J., Zhang, Y. and Quan, X. (2012b), "Electricity assisted anaerobic treatment of salinity wastewater and its effects on microbial communities", Water Res., 46(11), 3535-3543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.059
  35. Zhang, S., Wang, P., Fu, X. and Chung, T.S. (2014b), "Sustainable water recovery from oily wastewater via forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD)", Water Res., 52, 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.044
  36. Zhang, X., Ning, Z., Wang, D.K. and Diniz da Costa, J.C. (2014c), "Processing municipal wastewaters by forward osmosis using CTA membrane", J. Membr. Sci., 468, 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.016
  37. Zhao, P., Gao, B., Yue, Q., Kong, J., Shon, H.K., Liu, P. and Gao, Y. (2015), "Explore the forward osmosis performance using hydrolyzed polyacrylamide as draw solute for dye wastewater reclamation in the longterm process", Chem. Eng. J., 273, 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.093
  38. Zhao, S., Zou, L., Tang, C.Y. and Mulcahy, D. (2012), "Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges", J. Membr. Sci., 396, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023
  39. Zheng, X., Chen, D., Wang, Q. and Zhang, Z. (2014), "Seawater desalination in China: Retrospect and prospect", Chem. Eng. J., 242, 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.104