DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Empirical Validation of Personal Information Violation Risks with Use Intention : Focusing on Domestic Smart Banking Services

개인정보 침해위험이 이용의도에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구 - 국내은행의 스마트뱅킹 서비스 중심으로

  • 김정욱 (세종대학교 경영대학) ;
  • 전영찬 (세종대학교 대학원 경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.07.31
  • Accepted : 2017.08.30
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is how personal information protection risks affect the intention to use domestic smart banking services. VAM(Value based Adoption Model) model is validated as a theoretical background, selecting ease of use, usefulness and perceived security as a benefit factor, and considers perceived cost, technical complexity, and risk of personal information leakage as a sacrifice factor. Methods: The method of this study used questionnaire survey to collect 365 data on suer's perception on smart banking services, and also performed a structural equation modeling method using by AMOS 23. Results: The result of this paper shows that all hypothesis are accepted statistically significant except 1 hypothesis. Conclusion: This research is concluded that perceived value is affected on statistically positive impact on ease of use, usefulness and perceived security, and negative impact on perceived cost and risk of personal information violation, not statistically technical complexity.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Nassen, K. D. 1998. "Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs." Journal of Econometrics 89(1):393-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00068-2
  2. Cespedes, F. V., and Smith, H. J., 1993, "Database Marketing : New Rules for Policy and Practice." Sloan Management Review 3, 7-23.
  3. Choi Yoonkyung. 2015. "A study on Consumer Attitudes toward Personal Information Protection and Acceptance of Mobile Banking." SookmyungWomen's University.
  4. Choi, Yoonjung. 2015. "Influential Factors on User Satisfaction and Continued Intention to Use in Mobile Payment Service." Yonsei University.
  5. Davis, F.D. 1986. "A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems : Theory and Results." Doctoral Dissertation MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
  6. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. 1989. "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models." Management science 35(8):982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  7. DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. 1992. "Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable." Information systems research 3(1):60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  8. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. 1981. "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error." Journal of marketing research 18(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  9. Han Joonhyoung, Kang Sungbae, and Moon Taesoo. 2013. "An Empirical Study on Perceived Value and Continuous Intention to Use of Smart Phone, and the Moderating Effect of Personal Innovativeness." Asia PacificJournal of Information Systems 23(4):55-84. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2013.23.3.055
  10. Hung, S. Y., Ku, C. Y., and Chang, C. M. 2003. "Critical factors of WAP services adoption: an empirical study." Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2(1):42-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00008-5
  11. Hwang TaeWon. 2015. "A Study on the factors Affecting Potential Consumers'Intention to Use Home IoT." Yonsei University.
  12. Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., and Gupta S. 2007. "Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet : An empirical investigation." Decision Support Systems 43(1):111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
  13. Kuo, Y. F., & Yen, S. N. 2009. "Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services." Computers in Human Behavior 25(1):103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.007
  14. Lee Chung Ah. 2013. "A study on the factors that affect continuous use intention of mobile wallet through value based perspective." Yonsei University.
  15. Lee, J. G., Choi, H. J., and Choi, S. A. 2007. "Study on How Service Usefulness and Privacy Concern Influence on Service Acceptance." The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies 12(4):37-51.
  16. Park Young-Rai. 2014. "A Study on Information Security Level Assessment and Vulnerability Improvement for Financial-sector Information Security Level Enhancement." Yonsei University.
  17. Porter, C.E., and Donthu, N. 2006. "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics." Journal of Business Research 59:999-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003
  18. Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth Edition. The Free Press, New York.
  19. Rogers, E. M.. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Ed. Free Press: New York.
  20. Ruth, C. J. 2000. "Applying a modified technology acceptance model to determine factors affecting behavioral intentions to adopt electronic shopping on the World Wide Web: A structural equation modeling approach." Drexel university.
  21. Swaminathan, V., E. Lepkowska White, and Bharat P. Rao. 1999. "Browser or Buyers in Cyberspace? An Investigation of Factor Influencing electronic Exchange." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5(2), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/oldswaminathan.htm.
  22. Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. 2001. "A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges." MIS quarterly, 71-102.
  23. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies." Management Science 46(2):186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  24. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view." MIS quarterly 27(3): 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  25. Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H., and Tang, T. I. 2003. "Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study." International Journal of Service Industry Management 14(5):501-519. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310500192
  26. You, J. and Park, C. 2010. "A Comprehensive Review of Technology Acceptance Model Researches." Entrue Journal of Information Technology 9(2):31-50.
  27. Zeithaml, V. A. 1988. "Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence." The Journal of Marketing 52(July):2-22. http://www.itworld.co.kr/news/80518, 2013/02/27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446