DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is a Cause-Related Self-Prevention Campaign a Good CSR Strategy?: Effects of Negative Social Acceptance and Consumer Attitude on Biased Evaluations

  • Park, Jihye (College of Business Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • Received : 2017.04.30
  • Accepted : 2017.08.04
  • Published : 2017.07.31

Abstract

This paper addresses the central issue of whether it is effective for a firm to discourage the purchase of its own product in order to support a social cause. The objectives of this study were: a) to examine whether a cause-related self-prevention ad would stimulate more positive evaluations compared to promotional ad, particularly when the product category is more negatively socially accepted; and 2) to determine if a negative attitude toward the product could induce a boomerang effect of a selfprevention ad. Results from three experiments revealed that socially responsible prevention campaigns against firm's own product may be more effective for the product category negatively associated with social concerns or welfare. If products are more limited in the social context, communications of product prevention are beneficial to improve the public image of the brand. However, the self-hurting approach may be inappropriate for potential customers who currently possess a strong negative attitude toward the product.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2017

References

  1. Ahluwalia, R. 2000. 'Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion.' Journal of Consumer Research, 27:Sep, 217-232. doi:10.1086/314321
  2. Arias-Bolzmann, L., Chakraborty, G. and Mowen, J. C. 2000. 'Effects of absurdity in advertising: The moderating role of product category attitude and the mediating role of cognitive responses.' Journal of Advertising, 29:1, 35-49. doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673602
  3. Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D. and Taylor, K. A. 2000. 'The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another?' Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28:2, 248-262. doi: 10.1177/0092070300282006
  4. Basil, D. Z. and Herr, P. M. 2006. 'Attitudinal balance and cause-related marketing: An empirical application of balance theory.' Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16:4, 391-403. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_10
  5. Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N. and Strack, F. 1990. 'Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis.' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16:2, 331-345. doi: 10.1177/0146167290162013
  6. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L. and Berntson, G. 1997. 'Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space.' Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1:Feb, 3-25. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
  7. Campbell, M. C. and Kirmani, A. 2000. 'Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent.' Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69-83. doi:10.1086/314309
  8. Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A. and Webb, D. 2000. 'Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix?' Journal of Retailing, 76:3, 393-406. doi: 10.1086/208888
  9. Etgar, M. and Goodwin, S. A. 1982. 'One-sided versus two-sided comparative message appeals for new brand introductions.' Journal of Consumer Research, 8: Mar, 460-465. doi:10.1086/208888
  10. Farrelly, M. C., Cheryl G. H., Davis, K. C., Messeri, P., Hersey, J. C. and Haviland, M. L. 2002. 'Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns.' American Journal of Public Health, 92:6, 901 - 907. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.6.901
  11. Golden, L. L. and Alpert, M. I. 1987. 'Comparative analysis of the relative effectiveness of one- and two-sided communication for contrasting products.' Journal of Advertising, 16:1, 18-68. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1987.10673056
  12. Jain, S. P. and Maheswaran, D. 2000. 'Motivated reasoning: A depth-of-processing perspective.' Journal of Consumer Research, 26:Mar, 358-371. doi: 10.1086/209568
  13. Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D. and Thelen, N. 2001. 'Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decision: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure on information.' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80:4, 557-571. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
  14. Jones, E. E. and Davis, K. E. 1965. 'From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception.' In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. II: 219-266. New York: Academic Press.
  15. Kamins, M. A. and Assael, H. 1987. 'Twosided versus one-sided appeals: A cognitive perspective on argumentation, source derogation, and the effect of disconfirming trial and belief change.' Journal of Marketing Research, 24:Feb, 29-39. doi: 10.2307/3151751
  16. Kim, S. and Shanahan, J. 2003. 'Stigmatizing smokers: Public sentiment toward cigarette smoking and its relationship to smoking behaviors.' The Journal of Social Psychology, 8:4, 343-367. doi: 10.1080/10810730305723
  17. Lynch, J. G. and Srull, T. K. 1982. 'Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: Concepts and research methods.' Journal of Consumer Research, 9:June, 18-37. doi:10.1086/208893
  18. Maheswaran, D. and Chaiken, S. 1991. 'Promoting systematic processing in low-involvement settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment.' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: July, 13-25. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.13
  19. Menon, S. and Kahn, B. E. 2003. 'Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand?' Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13:3, 316-327. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_12
  20. Moore, R. S. 2005. 'The sociological impact of attitudes toward smoking: Secondary effects of the demarketing of smoking.' The Journal of Social Psychology, 145:6, 703-718. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.145.6.704-718
  21. OECD. 2013. OECD factbook 2013: Economic, environmental and social statistics. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/factbook-2013-en/12/02/01/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/factbook-2013-98-en
  22. Olsen, G. D. and Pracejus, J. W. 2004. 'Integration of positive and negative affective stimuli.' Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14:4, 374-384. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_7
  23. Priester, J. R. and Petty, R. 1995. 'Source attributions and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny.' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 637-654. doi: 10.1177/0146167295216010
  24. Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S. and Tordesillas, R. S. 1995. 'Attitude strength and resistance processes.' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69:3, 408-419. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.408
  25. Putrevu, S. and Lord, K. R. 1994. 'Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitude affects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions.' Journal of Advertising Research, 23, 77-90. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1994.10673443
  26. Settle, R. B. and Golden, L. L. 1974. 'Attribution theory and advertiser credibility.' Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 181-185. doi: 10.2307/3150556
  27. Simmons, C. J. and Becker-Olsen, K. L. 2006. 'Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships.' Journal of Marketing, 70:4, 154-169. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.154
  28. Smith, R. E. and Hunt, S. D. 1978. 'Attributional processes and effects in promotional situations.' Journal of Consumer Research, 5:Dec, 149-158. doi:10.1086/208725
  29. Stayman, D. M. and Batra, R. 1991.' Encoding and retrieval of ad affect in memory.' Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 232-239. doi: 10.2307/3172812
  30. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. 1995. 'Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions.' International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137-156. doi: 10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K