DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

운영중인 지하구조물의 누수처리를 위한 유도배수공법의 개선

Improvement of existing drainage system for leakage treatment in exiting underground structures

  • 김동규 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구소) ;
  • 임민진 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구소)
  • Kim, Dong-Gyou (Geotechnical Engineering Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Yim, Min-Jin (Geotechnical Engineering Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.20
  • 심사 : 2017.07.28
  • 발행 : 2017.07.31

초록

본 연구의 목적은 지하 콘크리트 구조물에서 부분적으로 발생하는 누수를 처리하기 위하여 기존에 제안된 전단면 유도배수시스템을 수정하여 제안하는 것이다. 누수된 부분에만 유도배수시스템을 적용하기 위하여 누수된 지하수를 유도배수시스템내에서 집수 지점으로 유도하는 기술과 집수된 지하수를 지하 콘크리트 구조물의 배수 시설로 이동시키기 위한 기술을 추가 제안하였다. 유도배수시스템내로 누수된 지하수를 집수 지점으로 유도하기 위한 4가지 방수 재료들, 즉, 다공질의 고무 재료인 Durkflex, 초강력 접착력을 가진 KE-45 실리콘 접착제, 폴리머 계열 재료인 Hotty-gel 및 일반 실리콘 접착제에 대한 성능 평가를 수행하였다. 방수 재료 Hotty-gel만 완벽한 방수 성능을 보였고 나머지 3가지 방수 재료들에서는 누수가 발생하였다. 선정된 방수 재료 Hotty-gel과 집수 지점에서 배수시설로 누수된 지하수를 이동시키기 위한 배수관 및 고정 새들(saddle)을 추가한 유도배수시스템을 콘크리트 옹벽에서 시험 시공하였다. 재령 7일, 14일, 21일, 28일, 2개월, 및 3개월에 수정된 유도배수시스템 배면에 1,000 ml의 물을 주입하여 방수 성능과 유도배수 성능을 평가하였다. 재령 3개월까지 방수 성능 및 유도배수 성능에는 전혀 이상이 없는 것으로 확인되었다. 수정된 유도배수시스템의 총 공사 기간 및 공사비에 대한 평가를 위하여 표면 정리 단계, 누수 처리 단계 및 단면 복구 단계별로 기존 누수 보수 공법과 비교하였다. 작업 내용, 보수 재료, 시공 장비, 작업 시간, 작업 인원 등을 고려한 개략적인 총 공사 시간 및 공사비에 대하여 비교하였다. 각 시공 단계별로 비교 분석한 결과 수정된 유도배수시스템은 기존의 누수 처리 공법보다 총 공사 기간 및 공사비를 절감할 수 있을 것으로 판단되었다.

The objective of this study is to propose a modification of the previously proposed drainage system for catching the partial leakage of underground concrete structures. Two techniques were proposed for applying the drainage system only to the leaking parts. One was for conveying leaking groundwater to the collection point in the drainage system and the other was for conveying the collected groundwater to the primary drainage system of the underground concrete structure. Four waterproofing materials for conveying leaking groundwater to the catchment point of the drainage system, Durkflex made of porous rubber material, KE-45 silicone adhesive with super strong adhesion, Hotty-gel made of polymeric materials and general silicone adhesive were evaluated for waterproofing performance. Hotty-gel only showed perfect waterproof performance and the other three waterproof materials leaked. The modified drainage system with Hotty-gel and drainage pipe with fixed saddle to convey the leaking groundwater from the catchment point to the primary drainage system were tested on the concrete retaining wall. The waterproof performance and the drainage performance were evaluated by injecting 1,000 ml of water in the back of the modified drainage system at the 7-day, 14-day, 21-day, 28-day, 2-month and 3-month. There was no problem in waterproof performance and drainage performance of the modified drainage system during 3 months. In order to evaluate the construction period and construction cost of the modified drainage system, it was compared with the existing leaching repair method in surface cleaning stage, leakage treatment stage, and protective barrier stage. Total construction period and construction cost were compared in considering the contents of work, repair material, construction equipment, working time, and total number of workers. As a result of comparing and analyzing in each construction stage, it was concluded that the modified drainage system could save construction period and construction cost compared to the existing leaching repair method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choo, J.H., Park, S.W., Kim, H.T., Jee, K.H., Yoon, T.G. (2011), "Analysis and cause of occurrence of lining cracks on NATM tunnel based on the precise inspection for safety and diagnosis - Part I", Journal of Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 199-214.
  2. Federal Highway Administration & Federal Transit Administration, (2004), Highway and Rail Transit tunnel maintenance and rehabilitation manual, pp. 4-1-4-19.
  3. Federal Highway Administration, (2015), Tunnel Operations maintenance inspection Evaluation (TOMIE) manual, pp. 3-1-3-20.
  4. Kim, D.G., Baek, Y., Shin, H.Y., Jung, H.S. (2009), Development of Safety Maintenance and Disaster Prevention Technology(VI), KICT 2009-069, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, pp. 181-188.
  5. Kim, D.G., Yim, M.J, (2017), "Development and performance verification of induced drainage method for leakage treatment in existing underground structures", Journal of Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 533-549. https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2017.19.3.533
  6. Kim, D.G., Jung, H.S., Bae, G.J., Shin, H.S. (2009), "Characterization of deterioration of concrete lining in tunnel structures", Journal of Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 387-391.
  7. Kim, H.T., Han, M.Y., Son, E.J., Han, R.H., Jung, J.M. (2008), "A study on the state of the art on the construction and the new technology of the underground structure (underpass, underground passageways)", Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 891-894.
  8. Korea Rail Network Authority, (2016), http://kr.or.kr/sub/info.do?m=05020202.
  9. Lee, Y.S., Park, S.W., Whang, I.B., Shin, Y.S., Kim, S.G. (2009), "Analysis of cause and deterioration about using 3-Arch tunnel", Journal of Korean Tunneling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 97-105.
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, (2016), Yearbook of road bridge and tunnel Statistics.