DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Thrust Characteristics and Nozzle Role of Water Jet Propulsion

  • Ni, Yongyan (School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Liu, Weimin (School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Shen, Zhanhao (National Research Centre of Pumps, Jiangsu University) ;
  • Pan, Xiwei (National Research Centre of Pumps, Jiangsu University)
  • Received : 2014.10.26
  • Accepted : 2016.01.30
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

Surface pressure integration and momentum method were respectively performed to evaluate the impeller thrust and the system thrust of a contra-rotating axial flow water jet propulsion, and an interesting phenomenon so-called thrust paradox was revealed. To explain the paradox, the impeller thrust and the system thrust were physically and theoretically analyzed, the results show that the impeller thrust is head involved and is determined by the hydraulic parameters upstream and downstream the impeller, while the momentum method depicted by a classic equation is valid simply under the best efficiency point. Consequently, the role of a water jet propulsion nozzle was deduced that the nozzle is mainly to limit the flow rate that crosses the impeller and to assure the system working under the best efficiency condition apart from its ability to produce momentum difference. Related mathematical formula expressed the nozzle diameter is the dominant variable used to calculate the working condition of the water jet propulsion. Therefore the nozzle diameter can be steadily estimated by the former expression. The system thrust scaling characteristics under various speeds were displayed lastly.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Bulten, N. W. H., 2006, "Numerical Analysis of a Waterjet Propulsion System," Ph. D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Netherlands.
  2. Jung, K. H., Kim, K. C., Yoon, S. Y., Kwon, S. H., Chun H. H. and Kim, M. C., 2006, "Investigation of Turbulent Flows in a Waterjet Intake Duct Using Stereoscopic PIV Measurements," Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 11, pp. 270-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-006-0236-3
  3. Wu, H., Miorini, R. L. and Katz, J., 2011, "Measurements of the Tip Leakage Vortex Structures and Turbulence in the Meridional Plane of an Axial Water-jet Pump," Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 50, pp. 989-1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0975-0
  4. Takai, T., Kandasamy, M. and Stern, F., 2011, "Verification and Validation Study of URANS Simulations for an Axial Waterjet Propelled Large High-Speed Ship," Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 16, pp. 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-011-0138-x
  5. Jacobi, G., Thomas, G., Davis, M. R. and Davidson, G., 2014, "An Insight into the Slamming Behavior of Large High-Speed Catamarans through Full-Scale Measurements," Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 19, pp. 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-013-0229-y
  6. Kim, M. C., Chun, H. H., Kim, H. Y., Park, W. K. and Jung, U. H., 2009, "Comparison of Waterjet Performance in Tracked Vehicles by Impeller Diameter," Ocean Engineering, Vol. 36, pp. 1438-1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.07.017
  7. Shigemitsu, T., Fukutomi, J. and Agawa T., 2013, "Internal Flow Condition of High Power Contra-Rotating Small-Sized Axial Fan," International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.25-32. https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2013.6.1.025
  8. Subbarao, R. and Govardhan, M., 2013, "Effect of Axial Spacing between the Components on the Performance of a Counter Rotating Turbine," International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp.170-176. https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2013.6.4.170
  9. Cao, L., Watanabe, S., Honda, H., Yoshimura, H. and Furukawa, A., 2014, "Experimental Investigation of Blade-To-Blade Pressure Distribution in Contra-Rotating Axial Flow Pump," International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.130-141. https://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2014.7.4.130
  10. Naval Ship Research and Development Center, 1974, "Design and Evaluation of a highly Skewed Propeller for a Cargo Ship."
  11. Brennen, C. E., 2011, Hydrodynamics of Pumps, Concepts NREC and Cambridge University Press.
  12. Brennen, C. E., 2009, Fundamentals of Multiphase Flows, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Yuan, S., Ni, Y., Pan, Z. and Yuan, J., 2009, "Unsteady Turbulent Simulation and Pressure Fluctuation Analysis for Centrifugal Pumps," Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 64-69. https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2009.01.064
  14. Park, W. G., Jang, J. H., Chun, H. H. and Kim, M. C., 2005, "Numerical Flow and Performance Analysis of Waterjet Propulsion System," Ocean Engineering, Vol. 32, pp. 1740-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.02.004
  15. Jin, P. Z., 1986, Waterjet Propulsion for Ships, National Defense Industry Press. (In Chinese)