DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of shoe attributes importance according to shopping orientations of college women

여대생의 쇼핑성향에 따른 신발속성 중요도 비교

  • Lee, Kyung Lim (Dept. of Fashion Design & Merchandising, Kyungsung University)
  • 이경림 (경성대학교 패션디자인학과)
  • Received : 2017.01.01
  • Accepted : 2017.07.24
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

This study reveals the components of college women's shopping orientations and compares the attributes of shoes accordingly. This study attempts to investigate the needs of consumers in the target market of young women by comparing the importance of shoe attributes with their shopping orientations and to provide basic data for efficient marketing strategies which could increase sales. Data was collected using a questionnaire survey. Of a total of 330 questionnaires, 319 were used for statistical analysis. The survey was carried out from July to August 2016. The 17 shopping orientation-related questions and 13 questions about shoe purchase attributes were measured using a five-point Likert Scale. SPSS 23 was used to carry out: descriptives, factor analysis, reliability analysis, cluster analysis, ANOVA, and Duncan's test. Shopping orientations were divided between brand orientation, pleasure orientation, trend orientation and utilitarian orientation. Shoe attributes were categorized into ostentation value, product value, economic value and aesthetic value. College women were divided into the following groups: active shopping, passive shopping, rational shopping and conforming shopping. According to the comparison of the importance of shoe attributes by consumer type among college women, a significant difference by group was found in ostentation value and aesthetic value only. Furthermore, the average scores on the importance of product value and economic value were very high without significant differences between groups. The study results would be available as basic data to help improving the visual image of shoes and product quality for brands targeting young women in the fashion industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, K. H., Hwang, S. J., & Jung, C. J. (2010). 패션마케팅 [Fashion marketing] (3th ed.). Seoul: Soohaksa.
  2. Ahn, N. K. (2016, December 6). 2016년 결산 14-슈즈:기능성 강조하는 실용적 트렌드 [End of 2016 14-Shoes: Practical trends that emphasize functionality]. Fashion Channel, Retrieved February 18, 2017, from http://www.fashionchannel.co.kr/main/bbs.php?table=inews&where=ALL&search_step=1&category=승인&query=view&uid=43669&p=1
  3. Brown, M. (2000). An investigation of the relationship between consumer shopping orientation and online purchase behaviour. Proceedings of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, USA, 7(4), 59-64.
  4. Cha, I. S., Ahn, S. H., & Lee, K. H. (1999). A study on clothing shopping orientations and store choice criteria on department stores consumers. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 23(2), 284-295.
  5. Cho, H. K. (2006). Leisure activity and cloth purchasing pattern following the consumption oriented theory: Targeting women between the ages of 20's and 30's. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Cho, W.-S. (2013). The status of global footwear industry and overseas expansion strategy of the domestic shoes enterprise. Unpublished master's thesis, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea.
  7. Cho, Y. J., & Choi, J. H. (2012). A study on consumer buying behavior of functional shoe: Focused on well-being health consciousness. Korea Science & Art Forum, 10, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2012.07.10.223
  8. Choi, E. J. (2005). A study on young casual clothing wear and clothing purchasing behaviors: Focus on price discounts. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Choi, S. H. (1996). A study of general values and clothing shopping orientations for unmarried women. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  10. Choi, Y.-H. (2013). The effect of perceived product nature on consumption value and repurchase intent. Unpublished master's thesis, Hong-ik University, Seoul, Korea.
  11. Daehak Naeil Age 20s Research Institute. (2015, March 31). 20대의 가치소비 습관, 당신은 어떤 유형? [Valuable consumption habit of young consumers in their 20s, what type of consumer are you?]. WikiTree, Retrieved September 10, 2016, from http://www.wikitree.co.kr/main/news_view.php?id=213381
  12. Dickson, M. A., & Littrell, M. A. (1997). Consumers of clothing from alternative trading organizations: Societal attitudes and purchase evaluative criteria. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(1), 20-33. doi:10.1177/0887302X9701500103
  13. Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluation women's apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22. doi:10.1177/0887302X9000800202
  14. Gehrt, K. C., Alpander, G. G., & Lawson, D. (1992). A factor-analysis examination of catalog shopping orientations in france. Journal of Euromarketing, 2(2), 49-69. doi:10.1300/J037v02n02_05
  15. Ham, J. S. (2017, February 13). 침체된 패션 시장, 복고가 '활력' [Stagnated fashion market, retro 'vitality']. Edaily, Retrieved February 23, 2017, from http://www.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?SCD=JC21&newsid=01285766615830192&DCD=A00302&OutLnkChk=Y
  16. Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J. & Coney, K. A. (1989). Consumer behavior: Implications for marketing strategy (4th ed.). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
  17. Hong, B.-S., & Na, Y.-K. (2007). The effect of apparel customer's product, price attributes and shopping values on internet shopping satisfaction. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(7), 1075-1084. doi:10.5850/JKSCT. 2007.31.7.1075
  18. Jang, Y.-S., Park, N. R, & Park, J.-O. (2009). A comparative study on Korean and Chinese apparel attributes according to the shopping values of college students. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(8), 1215-1226. doi: 10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.8.1215
  19. Jung, J. S. (2016, September 13). 2016 신발 마켓 트렌드: 성장률 감소세 불구 패션시장 비중 갈수록 증가 [2016 shoe market trend: continued increase in a portion of shoes to fashion market despite decrease in growth rates]. Korea Fashion+Tex News, Retrieved October 19, 2016, from http://www.ktnews.com/sub/view.php?cd_news=100467
  20. Ju, S.-R., & Chung, M.-S.(2014). The effects of both store and private brand apparel product attributes on satisfaction and repurchase intention at large discount stores. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 22(1), 143-157. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2014.22.1.143
  21. Kang, B. H. (2010, July 2). 소비의 핵, 20대 여성을 공략하라 [Target the core of consumption: young women in their 20s]. The Korea Optical News, Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://www.opticnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=15357
  22. Kang, K.-J. (1999). A study of impulse buying and psychological characteristics of college women by their clothing shopping orientation. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 7(4), 625-636.
  23. Kim, H.-H. (2015). A study on characteristics of purchasing and purchase evaluative criteria according to consumer's market segmentation: Focusing on shoe product consumer. Unpublished master's thesis, Wonkwang University, Jeollabuk-do, Korea.
  24. Kim, H. J., & Chung, M. S. (2015). The effects of clothes shopping orientation and perceived risk on purchase intention in social commerce. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 23(3), 384-399. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.3.384
  25. Kim, I. J., Kim, J. S., Lee, J. H., Lee, D. J., & Bae, J. W. (2016). 신발 산업 및 섬유 소재 동향 [Footwear industry and textile material trend]. Fiber Technology and Industry, 20(3), 175-183.
  26. Kim, J.-W. (2011). Shoes purchase behaviors of female consumers based on pursued fashion image. The Journal of the Korean Society of Knit Design, 9(2), 60-73.
  27. Kim, S. A., & Kim, J. Y. (2009). Shoes shopping orientation and importance of store attributes determined by 30-40s female shoppers. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 15(3), 48-57.
  28. Kim, S.-H. (2003). Development of conceptual structure and measurement scale for clothing shopping orientation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  29. Kim, S.-H., & Rhee, E.-Y. (2004). A documentary study to determine the concept of clothing shopping orientation. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(3/4), 472-482.
  30. Kim, S. Y., & Rhee, E. Y. (1994). A study on clothing shopping orientations of consumers. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 18(3), 429-439.
  31. Kottler, P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis planning, implementation, and control (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  32. Kwak, S. M. (2017, February 9). 5개월만에 15만족! 휠라 '코트디럭스' 화제 [In five months, 150,000 pairs! Fila 'Court Deluxe' topic]. Fashionbiz, Retrieved February 23, 2017, from http://www.fashionbiz.co.kr/TN/?cate=2&recom=2&idx=158883
  33. Lee, A.-R., & Yoo, T.-S. (2010). Effects of shopping orientation on brand loyalty and shopping satisfaction of fashion outlet consumers. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 60(2), 114-129.
  34. Lee, G. H. (2014, October 30). 20대 소비, 위태로워 보인다 [Consumption of 20, it looks dangerous]. Monthly Saram, Retrieved September 19, 2016, from http://www.monthlysaram.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=2287
  35. Lee, O.-H., Kim, K.-H., & Choi, M.-H. (2002). A study on knit wear buying behavior according to shopping orientations. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 10(4), 364-376.
  36. Lee, S. B., & Bae, J. C. (2017, March 25). 식지 않는 '복고열풍'...이번엔 'N세대 패션' 컴백 [The 'retro fever'...This time 'N generation fashion' comeback]. The Korea Economic Daily, Retrieved April 8, 2017, from http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=2017032462851
  37. Lee, S.-H., Lee, J.-Y., & Park, M.-J. (2010). Shoes purchasing behavior and wearing satisfaction related with lifestyle of high school girls. Journal of the Korea Fashion & Costume Design Association, 12(2), 75-90.
  38. Lee, W. S., Song, W. R., & Kim, S. A. (2014). A study on the purchasing behavior factor analysis of shoes products in high school students. Journal of Integrated Design Research, 13(4), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.21195/jidr.2014.13.4.004
  39. Lim, K.-B. (2006). The effect of shopping orientations on clothing purchasing behavior according to residence. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 14(3), 366-380.
  40. Lim, K.-B. (2007). A study on the clothing involvement, shopping orientation and clothing purchasing behavior according to the types of information source usage. Journal of the Korea Fashion & Costume Design Association, 9(1), 221-234.
  41. Min, J. H. (2017, March 6). 복고풍 스니커즈 열풍 타고 라코스테 스포츠 국내 첫선 [Lacoste Sports comes to Korea with retro sneakers fever]. The Korea Economic Daily, Retrieved March 8, 2017, from http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=2017030679571
  42. Na, Y. K., & Suh, H. S. (2008). A study on on-line consumer's shopping propensity and satisfaction based on apparel product attributes and price attributes. Fashion and Textile Research Journal, 10(2), 164-172.
  43. Park, E. J., & Kim, B. K. (2016). Effects of shopping orientation, marketing stimulus and perceived risk on e-impulse buying of shoes markets. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 19(1), 71-82. doi:10.14695/KJSOS.2016.19.1.71
  44. Park, E. J., & Rhee, E. Y. (1993). A theoretical study on situational influences in clothing purchase behavior. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 17(2), 219-231.
  45. Park, H.-H., & Ku, Y.-S. (2008). A cross-cultural study on the factors influencing on fashion brand loyalty between Korean and American college students: Focused on shopping orientations, clothing attributes evaluation, clothing benefits sought. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 16(5), 910-923. https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2008.16.5.910
  46. Park, H. J., & Yoo, T.-S. (2012). The structural analysis of the variables among clothes consumption value, need for uniqueness, use information sources related to importance of apparel product attributes and store attributes. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 36(8), 802-813. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2012.36.8.802
  47. Park, S. E. (2006). The cognitive complexity of clothing attributes: Focused on clothing involvement. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 30(4), 497-506.
  48. Park, S. H. (2005). A study about purchasing act of the fashion accessories according to customers' shopping tendency: Focusing on the shoes and handbags. Unpublished master's thesis, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  49. Park, S. Y. (2017, April 6). 정장과 캐주얼 사이 '가성비 甲' 멀티슈즈 [Between suit and casual 'costeffectiveness 甲'multi-shoes]. Financial News, Retrieved April 8, 2017, from http://www.fnnews.com/news/201704062020178878
  50. Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28-36. doi:10.2307/1251914
  51. Shin, W.-H., & Yoo, T.-S. (2004). The study on goods attributes and brand attitude by fashion brand. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 13(6), 943-957.
  52. Yoo, H. Y. (2015, November 14). 20대 신조어로 본 그들만의 문화 [A glimpse at distinct culture of their own among young adults in their 20s through neologisms]. ChosunBiz, Retrieved December 28, 2016, from http://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2015/11/13/2015111303033.html