DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Risk Perception Characteristics for Food Risk Elements of University Students in Yeungnam Region

영남 지역 대학생들의 식품 위해요인에 대한 위험 지각 특성 연구

  • Kim, Hyochung (Dept. of Family Counseling & Welfare.Consumer Sciences, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Meera (Dept. of Food Science & Nutrition, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김효정 (인제대학교 가족상담복지.소비자학부) ;
  • 김미라 (경북대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2017.07.25
  • Accepted : 2017.08.17
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the levels of risk perception characteristics for food risk elements using a psychometric paradigm from 298 university students in Yeungnam region, Korea, by a self-administered questionnaire. The respondents showed the highest level of risk concern about radioactive contaminated foods and the lowest level about GM (genetically modified) foods. In the risk perception characteristics for food risk elements, they perceived radioactive contaminated foods as a catastrophic, worried, new, and uncontrollable risk. In addition, they regarded food additives and foodborne illness as a chronic, controllable, old, and scientifically and individually known risk. According to the results of the factor analysis for risk perception characteristics, dread and unknown were categorized. In the risk perception map, mad cow disease, heavy metal contaminated foods, and radioactive contaminated foods were considered as a dreaded and unknown risk, whereas pesticide residues and GM foods were perceived as a less dreaded and unknown risk. Additionally, food additives and foodborne illness were regarded as a less dreaded and known risk and endocrine disruptors and avian influenza as a dreaded and known risk. These results imply that risk perception characteristics of consumers should be considered to establish strategies for risk communication in food science.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha YJ (2001) A comparative analysis of environment risk perception and policy implications: With focus on Yongin city. Korean Public Administration Review 35(1): 127-142.
  2. Cha YJ (2006) Risk acceptance-A social psychological approach. Crisisonomy 2(1): 36-44.
  3. Cha YJ (2007) Risk perception and policy implications for risk analysis: With focus on the lay people in the capital region. The Korea Association for Policy Studies 16(1): 97-116.
  4. Cha YJ (2014) A comparison of regional risk perception and policy implications for risk analysis: Focusing on Daegu and Mokpo region. Korean Policy Sciences Review 18(1): 29-48.
  5. Chang MS, Kang EJ, Cho MY, Choi GS, Hong YP, Seo KJ, Kim GH (2009) Survey on the perception of consumers on imported food safety management. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 38(11): 1625-1632. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.11.1625
  6. Choe JS, Chun HK, Hwang DY, Nam HJ (2005) Consumer perceptions of food-related hazards and correlated of degree of concerns about food. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 34(1): 66-74. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.1.066
  7. Choi CW, Jeong JY, Hwang MS, Jung KK, Lee HM, Lee KH (2010) Risk communication study for nanotechnology using risk cognitive map. J Env Tox 25(3): 187-195.
  8. Heo SY, Yoon SW (2013) Analysis of consumer's risk perception about food safety through the analytic lens of psychometric paradigm. Korean Journal of Food Marketing Economics 30(2): 97-116.
  9. Kim H, Kim M (2009) Consumers' awareness of the risk elements associated with foods and information search behavior regarding food safety. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 19(1): 116-129.
  10. Kim H, Han JY, Kim M (2015) Analysis of levels of risk perception using psychometric paradigm and factors affecting concerns about food risk elements of housewives in Daegu. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 25(4): 691-702. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2015.8.25.4.691
  11. Kim KD, Lee JY (2010) A survey on the housewives' purchasing behavior and needs for food safety information. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 39(3): 392-398. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.3.392
  12. Kim M (2004) Food Safety. Shinjeong, Korea. p. 240
  13. Kim M, Kim H (2012) Awareness and information acquisition behavior regarding food hygiene and safety of college students in Yeungnam region. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 22(2): 305-314.
  14. Kim YP, Choi BS, Soh YJ, Chung IJ (1995) Risk perception in Korea and policy implications. Korean Republic Administration Review 29(3): 935-954.
  15. Lee JY, Kim KD (2009) Study on the perception of and concern for food safety among urban housewives. Korean J Food Preserv 16(6): 999-1007.
  16. Lee YA, Lee N (2005) Psychological dimensions of risk perception. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science 16(3): 199-211.
  17. Nam HJ, Kim YS (2006) A survey on perceived food safety in urban residents. Korean J Food & Nutr 19(2): 126-142.
  18. Sah JY, Yeo JS (2013) Comparative study on levels of consumers' perception of food risk due to technological hazards: Focus on the genetically modified foods, food additives, and mad cow disease. Consumer Policy and Education Review 9(4): 1-28.
  19. Slovic P (1986) Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Analysis 6(4): 403-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00953.x
  20. Slovic P (2000) The Perception of Risk. London and Sterling, Earthscan Publications, VA, USA. pp. 120-148.
  21. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1984) Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychology 56(s 1-3): 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(84)90018-0