Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development of Experiential Places and a Task-based Experiential Learning Program in 3~4th Grade Curriculum of 2009

2009개정 3~4학년군 과학교육과정과 연계한 체험학습 장소 및 과제형 체험학습 프로그램 개발

  • Received : 2017.08.08
  • Accepted : 2017.08.25
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a program that enables students to participate in various experiential learning places in order to provide various experiences to students for solve the problem of prejudice to specific places such as science museum, zoo and botanical garden. For this purpose, the surveys were conducted about experiential places and awareness of experiential learning. 88 elementary school teachers participated in the survey. As a result, they were positive about the use of experiential learning in elementary science instruction, but there were responses that a lot of preparations for the progress and efforts were needed. Therefore, if instructional materials and teaching materials for experiential learning are given, it is confirmed that the intention of using is increased. And the results were analyzed and the experiential sites were categorized into 12 types. We could present basic data that can diversify not only the science museum but also science related experiential places. We developed a learning program related to 'The Liquid and Gas' unit of the third grade, And 'Life unit of Plant' unit of the third $4^{th}$ grade. Through this study, we intend to help science experiential learning to be activated and student - centered experiential learning to be realized.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2014). 2009 개정 과학과 교사용 지도서 3-1. (주) 미래엔.
  2. 권난주 (2017). 지역사회와 연계하는 과학 체험활동을 위한 체험장소 및 교육내용에 따른 콘텐츠 개발. 교육논총, 37(2), 1-18.
  3. 권난주, 안재홍 (2011). 이동과학차 프로그램 분석을 통한 창의적 체험활동 활성화 방안. 현장과학교육, 5(2), 164-173.
  4. 김봉수 (2004). 초등학교 교육과 박물관 교육 연계를 위한 체험학습 프로그램. 한국박물관학회지, 7, 170-188.
  5. 김성원, 정영란, 우애자, 이현주 (2012). 융합인재교육을 위한 이론적 모형의 제안. 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.388
  6. 김훈희, 최호성 (2004). 지역화 교육과정의 학습 내용 조직 모형의 구안. 교육과정연구, 22(4), 113-134.
  7. 맹영임, 이광호, 이진원, 오민아, 이재연 (2012). 주 5일 수업제에 따른 청소년활동 활성화 방안 연구. 한국청소년개발원 연구보고서, 1-410.
  8. 박윤배, 정원우, 이광필, 임석훈, 박홍배 (2005). 초.중등학교 과학탐구활동 및 체험학습 프로그램의 운용실태 조사. 과학교육연구지, 28, 41-52.
  9. 박종규 (1987). 야외학습지도의 이론과 실제. 과학교육, 271, 41-48.
  10. 백소이, 노석구, 신명경 (2011). 초등교사의 비형식 과학교육에 대한 인식. 교과교육학연구, 15(3), 737-755.
  11. 양미경 (2001). 체험학습의 의미 및 조건의 탐색과 예시자료 개발. 교육학연구, 39(1), 167-196.
  12. 옥승현, 최선영 (2014). 영흥도 지역자원을 활용한 학교 밖 영재 프로그램 개발 및 적용 효과. 과학교육연구지, 38 (2), 356-375.
  13. 이병환 (2010). 학교폭력 대처를 위한 지역유관기관의 지원체제 정립과 활성화 방안. 교육문화연구, 16, 45-73.
  14. 이선경, 최지은, 신명경, 김찬종, 임진영, 변호승, 이창진 (2004). 세계 주요 자연사 박물관의 교육 프로그램의 유형 및 특징. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 357-374.
  15. 하정화, 손주영 (2015). 자유학기제 시행에 따른 청소년체험활동 활성화방안. 부산: 부산여성가족개발원.
  16. Catalano, R. F., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B. & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the social development research group. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08281.x
  17. Jarvis, T. & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children's attitudes toward science, before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20045
  18. Knapp, C. E. (2014). Place-based curricular and pedagogical models. Place-based education in a global age: Local diversity, 43-80.
  19. Lindsey, L. & Berger, N. (2009). Experiential approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. III, 117-142). New York, NY: Routledge.
  20. Manner, B. M. (1995). Field studies benefit students and teacher. Journal of Geological Education, 43, 128-131. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.128
  21. Martin, S. C. (2003). The influence of outdoor schoolyard experiences on students' environmental knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and comfort levels. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173843
  22. Orion, N. (2003). The outdoor as a central learning environment in the global science literacy framework: From theory to practice. In V.J. Mayer (Ed.), Implementing global science literacy. Ohio State University Press, OH, USA, pp. 53-66.
  23. Tal, T. & Abramovitch, A. (2013). Activity and action: Bridging environmental sciences and environmental education. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1665-1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9327-9
  24. Wurdinger, S. D. (2005). Using experiential learning in the classroom: Practical ideas for all educators. Lanham, MD: ScarecrowEducation.
  25. Zana, B. (2006). Seeing ourselves through their eyes: How do teachers regard science centers? Proceedings of the European Network of Science centers and Museums Conference, Mechelen, Belgium.