The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance angles obtained using radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods

  • Kwon, Oh-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yang, Seung-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Jee-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2016.10.27
  • Accepted : 2017.05.11
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study compared the SCGAs measured in three types of radiographic images (panoramic, CBCT panoramic-section, and CBCT cross-section images) with values measured using the protrusive occlusal record. MATERIALS AND METHODS. SCGAs were measured in 20 patients on a semi-adjustable articulator using the protrusive interocclusal record. Panoramic and CBCT images were obtained. SCGAs were measured on CBCT images in panoramic and cross sections. In all of the radiographic images, SCGAs were measured using the Frankfort horizontal reference line and the mean curvature line. The most-superior and most-inferior points of the curvatures were identified to determine the mean curvature line. Each measurement was performed twice by two operators independently. The data were analyzed by the t-test, Pearson's correlation test, and Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ using SPSS (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The mean right and left SCGAs were as follows: protrusive occlusal record (30.1 and 30.2 degrees, respectively), panoramic (38.9 and 38.7 degrees), CBCT panoramic sections (35.4 and 36.8 degrees), and CBCT cross sections (35.3 and 36.1 degrees). The SCGAs differed significantly among the groups. The Pearson coefficients for the correlations with the protrusive occlusal record measurements on the left and right sides were as follows: panoramic (0.834 and 0.791, respectively), CBCT panoramic-section (0.918 and 0.837), and CBCT cross-section (0.918 and 0.845) images. CONCLUSION. Strong correlations were found between SCGAs obtained using radiographic images and the protrusive occlusal record.

Keywords

References

  1. Braly BV. Occlusal analysis and treatment planning for restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:168-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90193-X
  2. Gilboa I, Cardash HS, Kaffe I, Gross MD. Condylar guidance: correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:477-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60112-2
  3. Prasad KD, Shetty M, Chandy BK. Evaluation of condylar inclination of dentulous subjects determined by axiograph and to compare with manual programming of articulators using protrusive interocclusal record. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6:371-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.161892
  4. Shrestha P, Jain V, Bhalla A, Pruthi G. A comparative study to measure the condylar guidance by the radiographic and clinical methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:153-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.153
  5. Utz KH, Muller F, Luckerath W, Fuss E, Koeck B. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:458-66. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00864.x
  6. Prasad KD, Shah N, Hegde C. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3:383-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107419
  7. Christensen C. The problem of the bite. Dent Cosmos 1905;47:1184-905.
  8. Tannamala PK, Pulagam M, Pottem SR, Swapna B. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study. J Prosthodont 2012;21:181-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00811.x
  9. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent 2009;2009:634567.
  10. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:825-33.
  11. Christensen LV, Slabbert JC. The concept of the sagittal condylar guidance: biological fact or fallacy? J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb00384.x
  12. Godavarthi AS, Sajjan MC, Raju AV, Rajeshkumar P, Premalatha A, Chava N. Correlation of condylar guidance determined by panoramic radiographs to one determined by conventional methods. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:123-8.
  13. Millstein PL, Kronman JH, Clark RE. Determination of the accuracy of wax interocclusal registrations. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:189-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90107-7
  14. Assif D, Himel R, Grajower Y. A new electromechanical device to measure the accuracy of interocclusal records. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:672-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90380-0
  15. Freilich MA, Altieri JV, Wahle JJ. Principles for selecting interocclusal records for articulation of dentate and partially dentate casts. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:361-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90346-C
  16. Gross M, Nemcovsky C, Friedlander LD. Comparative study of condylar settings of three semiadjustable articulators. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:135-41.
  17. Posselt U, Franzen G. Registration of the condyle path inclination by intraoral wax records: Variations in three instruments. J Prosthet Dent 1960;10:441-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(60)90007-X
  18. Craddock FW. The accuracy and practical value of records of condyle path inclination. J Am Dent Assoc 1949;38:697-710. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1949.0066
  19. Olthoff L, Meijer I, de Ruiter W, Bosman F, van der Zel J. Effect of virtual articulator settings on occlusal morphology of CAD/CAM restorations. Int J Comput Dent 2007;10:171-85.

Cited by

  1. Reliability of the Intraoral Records for programming the Condylar Inclination of the Semiadjustable Articulator vol.22, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3109
  2. THREE-DIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THE SAGITTAL CONDYLAR INCLINATION IN SKELETAL CLASS II PATIENTS BASED ON COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS AXIOGRAPH AND CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY vol.21, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219519421400169
  3. Evaluation of Articular Eminence Inclination in Normo-Divergent Subjects with Different Skeletal Classes through CBCT vol.18, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115992