DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on affective and cognitive effects of application development education using authoring tool for high-school students

고등학생 대상 저작도구 활용 앱 개발 교육의 정의적·인지적 효과 분석

  • Received : 2017.07.04
  • Accepted : 2017.08.01
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

Due to the influence of the fourth industrial revolution in recent years, maker education is getting attention. Therefore, this study tried to propose the possibility of application (app) development education as maker education by empirically verifying the affective and cognitive effects of app development education using authoring tool. To do this, we implemented app development education in D high school in Seoul, Korea, and collected data from 41 participants. We analyzed the changes in attitudes toward SW education and creative problem-solving ability before and after the education by conducting the paired t-test, and the level of satisfaction and perceived achievement through descriptive statistics analysis. Also, the learner's responses collected through the open-ended questionnaire were analyzed qualitatively. The result showed that the attitude toward SW education and creative problem-solving ability showed statistically significant improvement after app development education using the authoring tool, and the learner's statement also supported this result. Also, satisfaction and perceived achievement after the education were relatively high. Through these results, we have empirically confirmed the effect of app development education using the authoring tool for high school students, and derived the theoretical and practical implications.

최근 4차 산업혁명의 영향으로 메이커 교육이 관심의 대상이 되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 저작도구를 활용한 앱 개발 교육의 효과성을 정의적 인지적 차원에서 실증적으로 확인함으로써, 메이커 교육으로서 앱 개발 교육의 가능성을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 서울 소재 D고등학교에서 8차시에 걸친 앱 개발 교육을 실시하였으며, 이에 참여한 학습자 41명을 대상으로 자료를 수집하였다. SW교육에 대한 태도, 창의적 문제해결력 변인은 대응표본 t-검정을 통해 교육 전후의 변화를 분석하였고, 만족도와 인지된 성취도는 기술통계 분석을 통해 그 수준을 파악하였다. 또한 개방형 설문을 통해 수집된 학습자의 응답을 질적으로 분석하였다. 연구결과, SW교육에 대한 태도 및 창의적 문제해결력은 저작도구를 활용한 앱 개발 교육 후에 통계적으로 유의한 향상을 보였으며, 학습자의 진술문 또한 이를 뒷받침하였다. 또한 교육 이후 만족도 및 인지된 성취도가 비교적 높은 수준으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 고등학생 대상 저작도구를 활용한 앱 개발 교육의 효과를 실증적으로 확인하였으며, 이론적 실천적 시사점을 도출하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. App Inventor (n.d.). About us. Retrieved 25, June, 2017 from appinventor.mit.edu
  2. BiPlug (n.d.). Introduction. Retrieved 25, June, 2017 from www.biplug.co.kr
  3. Bloter (2014). Rapidly packaged SW education, would it be cramming coding? Retrieved from www.bloter.net/archives/201353
  4. Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The App Generation: How Today's Youth Navigate Identity, Intimacy, and Imagination in a Digital World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  5. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Using a discourse-intensive pedagogy and android's app inventor for introducing computational concepts to middle school students. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 723-728.
  6. Han S., & Kim, S. (2016). The effects of app programing education using m-Bizmaker on creative problem solving ability. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(6), 25-32.
  7. Holsapple, C. W.,. & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00102.x
  8. Hwang, S., Choi, J., & Lee, Y. (2014). The development of training programs for improving informatics gifted elementary students' creative problem solving Abilities. In Proceeding of Korean Association of Computer Education, 22(2), 165-168.
  9. Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem solving: The basic course. New York: Bearly Limited.
  10. Joo, Y., Han, S., & Kim, N. (2013). Development and validation of a scale to measure learning outcomes. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 17(2), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.2.461
  11. Kang, M., Jang, J., & Yoon, S. (2017). The predictability of science experience, school support and learning flow on the attitude of scientific inquiry in physical computing education. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 21(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.1.41
  12. Kang, M., Yoon, H., Kim, J., & Kim, H. (2008). Investigating the relationship among learning authenticity, learning motivation, and performance in web-based project learning. Journal of Educational Technologoy, 24(3), 23-51. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.24.3.23
  13. Kang, M., Yoon, S., Lim, H., Yoo, Y. (2012). Identifying predicting power of metacognition, perceived interaction, presence on learning outcomes in web-based collaborative learning. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 8(2), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2012.08.8.2.111
  14. Kurti, R. S., Kurti, D. L., & Fleming, L. (2014). The philosophy of educational makerspaces: Part 1 of making an educational makerspace. Teacher Librarian, 41(5), 8-11.
  15. Lim, H. (2015). Verifying the structural relationship among creativity and integrity, metacognition, mastery-approach goal, communication skills, and autonomous educational climate at the college level. Doctoral Dissertation, Ewha Womans University.
  16. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 30-39.
  17. m-BizMaker (n.d.). Introduction of m-BizMaker. Retrieved 25, June, 2017 from www.mbizmaker.com
  18. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning & Ministry of Education (2015). From elementary school to college, blue print for SW education: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning & Ministry of Education released Master Plan to Realize a Software-centered Society. Sejong: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning & Ministry of Education.
  19. Park, J. (2015). Effects of storytelling based software education on computational thinking. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 19(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.57
  20. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of human-computer studies, 64(8), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
  21. Seo, H., & Lee, Y. (2017). The effects of learning App Inventor programming education plan for gifted elementary students. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 21(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.1.13
  22. Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303048
  23. Wagner, A., Gray, J., Corley, J., & Wolber, D. (2013). Using app inventor in a K-12 summer camp. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 621-626.
  24. Wiebe, E. N., Williams, L., Yang, K., & Miller, C. (2003). Computer science attitude survey. Dept. of Computer Science, NC State University.

Cited by

  1. 교사의 앱 개발 교육에 대한 관심도 분석: 관심중심수용모형(CBAM)을 중심으로 vol.22, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.5.509