DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Similarity between Air Quality Monitoring Stations in Busan using Cluster Analysis

군집분석을 활용한 부산지역 오존, PM10 측정소의 유사성 분석

  • Do, Woo-gon (Busan Metropolitan City Institute of Health and Environment) ;
  • Jung, Woo-sik (Department of Atmospheric Environment Information Engineering, Atmospheric Environment Information Research Center, Inje University)
  • 도우곤 (부산광역시 보건환경연구원) ;
  • 정우식 (인제대학교 대기환경정보공학과/대기환경정보연구센타)
  • Received : 2017.06.19
  • Accepted : 2017.07.20
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine correlations and similarity between the ozone and $PM_{10}$ data of 19 air quality monitoring stations in Busan from 2013 to 2016, using correlation and cluster analyses. Ozone concentrations ranged from $0.0278{\pm}0.0148ppm$ at Gwangbok to $0.0378{\pm}0.017ppm$ at Taejongdae and were high in suburban areas, such as Yongsuri and Gijang, as well as in coastal areas, such as Jaw, Gwangan, Taejongdae and Noksan. $PM_{10}$ concentrations ranged from $37.2{\pm}25.0ug/m^3$ at Gijang to $58.3{\pm}32.2ug/m^3$ at and Jangrim. $PM_{10}$ concentrations were high in the west, exceeding the annual ambient air quality standard of $50ug/m^3$. Positive correlations were observed for ozone at most stations, ranging from 0.61 between Taejongdae and Sujeong to 0.92 between Bugok and Myeongjang. The correlation coefficients of $PM_{10}$ between stations ranged from 0.62 between Jangrim and Jaw to 0.9 between Gwangbok and Sujeong. Yeonsan, Daeyeon, and Myeongjang were highly correlated with other stations, so they needed to be reviewed for redundancy. Ozone monitoring stations were initially divided into two sections, north-western areas and suburban-coastal areas. The suburban-coastal areas were subsequently divided into three sections. $PM_{10}$ monitoring stations were initially divided into western and remaining areas, and then the remaining areas were subsequently divided into three sections.

Keywords

References

  1. Busan Metropolitan City Institute of Health and Environment, 2015, http://heis.busan.go.kr/
  2. Choi, I. J., Jo, W. K., Sin, S. H., 2016, Evaluation of air pollution monitoring networks in Seoul metropolitan area using multivariate analysis, J. Environ. Sci. Int., 25, 673-681. https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2016.25.5.673
  3. Gramsch, E., Cereceda-Balic, F., Oyola, P., von Baer, D., 2006, Examination of pollution trends in Santiago de Chile with cluster analysis of $PM_{10}$ and ozone data, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5464-5475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.062
  4. Gyeonggi Research Institute, 2007, Improvements of ambient air quality monitoring in Gyeonggi-Do.
  5. Ju, J. H., Hwang, I. J., 2011, A Study for spatial distribution of principal pollutants in Daegu area using air pollution monitoring network data, J. Kor. Soc. Atmos. Environ., 27, 545-557. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2011.27.5.545
  6. National Air Pollutants Emission Service, 2017, http://airemiss.nier.go.kr/
  7. National Institute of Environmental Research, 2015, Annual report of air quality 2015.
  8. Tong, L., Zhang, H., Yu, J., He, M., Xu, N., Zhang, J., Qian, F., Feng, J., Xiao, H., 2017, Characteristics of surface ozone and nitrogen oxides at urban, suburban and rural sites in Ningbo, China, Atmos. Research, 187, 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.12.006
  9. Yu, T. Y., Chang, L. F. W., 2000, Selection of the scenarios of ozone pollution at southern Taiwan area utilizing principal component analysis, Atmos. Environ., 34, 4499-4509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00112-6