Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회지)

Korean Society of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristic components of sugar-fed honey compared to natural honey

설탕 사양꿀의 특이 성분 분석

  • Kim, Se-Gun (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy Institute of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Hong, In-Phyo (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy Institute of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Woo, Soon-Ok (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy Institute of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Jang, Hye-Ri (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy Institute of Agricultural Sciences) ;
  • Han, Sang-Mi (Department of Agricultural Biology, National Academy Institute of Agricultural Sciences)
  • 김세건 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부 잠사양봉소재과) ;
  • 홍인표 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부 잠사양봉소재과) ;
  • 우순옥 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부 잠사양봉소재과) ;
  • 장혜리 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부 잠사양봉소재과) ;
  • 한상미 (국립농업과학원 농업생물부 잠사양봉소재과)
  • Received : 2017.02.14
  • Accepted : 2017.03.28
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We investigated and compared certain chemical properties of Korean natural honey and sugar-fed honey for assessing quality characteristics. The specification component was extracted using an organic solvent, and a single substance was isolated and identified as (E)-2-decenedioic acid. The content of (E)-2-decenedioic acid was $121{\pm}5.9mg/100g$ in sugar cane-fed honey and $127{\pm}4.5mg/100g$ in sugar beet-fed honey. Natural acacia, chestnut, and multi-floral honey contain $13{\pm}0.9$, $17{\pm}0.6$, and $13{\pm}1.3mg/100g$ of honey, respectively. Therefore, (E)-2-decenedioic acid was a major component of sugar-fed honey, however, it occurred in trace amounts in natural honey. We conclude that natural and sugar-fed honey can be distinguished by determining the (E)-2-decenedioic acid content.

천연꿀과 사양꿀의 성분 특성을 알아보기 위하여 천연 아카시아꿀, 밤꿀 그리고 잡화꿀을 대상으로 하였고, 사양꿀은 사탕수수 사양꿀 그리고 사탕무 사양꿀을 시료로 분석하였다. 사양꿀은 유기용매로 추출하여 단일물질을 분리하고, 이화학 분석을 통해 트랜스-2-데센다이산으로 동정하였다. 또한 UPLC를 이용하여 천연꿀과 사양꿀에서의 트랜스-2-데센다이산 함량을 분석한 결과, 사탕수수 사양꿀과 사탕무 사양꿀은 $121{\pm}5.9$, $127{\pm}4.5mg/100g$ 확인된 반면 천연 아카시아꿀에서는 $13{\pm}0.9mg/100g$, 밤꿀은 $17{\pm}0.6mg/100g$, 그리고 잡화꿀에서는 $13{\pm}1.3mg/100g$로 사양꿀에 비하여 상대적으로 매우 적게 포함되어 있음을 확인하였다. 이러한 결과로 보아 트랜스-2-데센다이산 성분은 사양꿀에서는 주요 성분이지만 천연꿀에서는 미량으로 존재하는 것으로 확인되었으며, 천연꿀과 사양꿀을 구분 할 수 있는 성분으로 가능성이 있는 것으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bogdanov S, Jurendica T, Sieber R, Gallmann O. Honey for nutrition and health: a review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 27: 677-689 (2008)
  2. Ediriweera ERHSS, Premarathna NYS. Medicinal and cosmetic uses of Bee's Honey-A review. Ayu. 33: 178-182 (2012) https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8520.105233
  3. Crane E. Honey: A comprehensive survey. Heinemann, London, UK. pp. 157-158 (1979)
  4. Kucuk M, Kolauli S, karaoglu S, Ulusoy E, Baltaci C, Candan F. Biological activities and chemical composition of three honeys of different types from Anatolia. Food Chem. 100: 526-534 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.10.010
  5. White JW, Riethof ML, Subers MH, Kushnir I. Composition of American honeys. Techincal Bulletin No. 1261. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA (1962)
  6. Nasuti C, Gabbianelli R, Falcioni G, Cantalamessa F. Antioxidative and gastroprotective activities of anti-inflammatory formulations derived from chestnut honey in rats. Nutr. Res. 26: 130-137 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2006.02.007
  7. Alvarez-Suarez JM, Gasparrini M, Forbes-Hernandez TY, Mazzoni L, Giampieri F. The composition and biological activity of honey: A focus on manuka honey. Foods 3: 420-432 (2014) https://doi.org/10.3390/foods3030420
  8. AOAC. Official Method of Analysis of AOAC Intl. 20th ed. Method 998-12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA (1995)
  9. European Commission. Official controls and enforcement. Honey 2015-16. Brussels, Belgium (2015)
  10. MFDS. Food Standard Code. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju, Korea (2014)
  11. Padovan GJ, De JD, Rodrigues LP, Marchini JS. Detection of adulteration of commercial honey samples by the $^{13}C$/$^{12}C$ isotopic ratio. Food Chem. 82: 633-636 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00504-6
  12. Martin IG, Macias EM, Sanchez JS, Rivera BG. Detection of honey adulteration with beet sugar using stable isotope methodology. Food Chem. 61: 281-286 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00101-5
  13. Schievano E, Morelato E, Facchin C, Mammi S. Characterization of markers of botanical origin and other compounds extracted from unifloral honeys. J. Agr. Food Chem. 61: 1747-1755 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf302798d
  14. Sivakesava S, Irudayaraj J. Detection of inverted beet sugar adulteration of honey by FTIR spectroscopy. J. Sci. Food Agr. 81: 683-690 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.858
  15. Tsuji J, Yasuda H. Synthesis of 2-decenedioic acid (royal jelly acid) by sequential carbonylation of butadiene catalyzed by a palladium-phosphine complex and dicobalt octacarbonyl. J. Organomet. Chem. 131: 133-135 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-328X(00)91365-2
  16. Tamotsu F, Toshio S, Toshiyuki I. A novel synthesis of royal jelly acids and queen substance by the five carbon homologation using ${\beta}$-vinyl-${\beta}$-propiolactone. Chem. Lett. 11: 219-220 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1982.219