Abstract
This study suggests the installment plan for the sharing and merging facilities of the unified troops according to the military structure reform. For this purpose, the intensive survey to reflect the opinions of various respondents such as enlisted and executive groups was conducted with the questionnaire which is composed with 13 statements associated with the sharing and merging facilities. The descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to identify the general pros and cons as well as difference of opinions between two groups, the executive and enlisted groups. According to the statistical analysis, even though there are a few inconsistent views concerning preference, two groups coincide in opinions for and against sharing and merging facilities without the repair facilities. The current defense military facility criteria have not been used dominantly in the determination to the architectural requirements of the armed forces because it did not reflect the actual demand of the field forces. Furthermore, the system to manage this architectural requirement has been invented to the permanent division units in conformity, so that its serviceability are not flexible in estimating architectural requirement of the unified troops. The outcomes of this study, which reflects the field claims, would be used as a basic data to assess the architectural requirements of the sharing and merging facilities in the unified troops.