References
- Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Summary Report of the International Workshop on Multi-unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment, CNSC, Ontario, Canada, 2014.
- Electric Power Research Unit, PWR Spent Fuel Pool Risk Assessment Integration Framework and Pilot Plant Application, EPRI Report 3002002691, EPRI, Palo Alto (CA), 2014.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Sharing of structures, systems, and components: general design criterion 5, Appendix A to 10 CFR 50, USNRC, Washington DC, 2007.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Determination of exclusion area, low population zone, and population center distance, 10 CFR 100.11, USNRC, Washington DC, 2002.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC Action Plan Developed as a Result of the TMI-2 Accident, NUREG-0660, USNRC, Washington DC, 1980.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, State-of-the-art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Report, NUREG-1935, USNRC, Washington DC, 2012.
- M.A. Stutzke, Scoping Estimates of Multiunit Accident Risk, Proceedings from Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (PSAM 12), Honolulu (HI), 2014.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, License Structure for Multi-module Facilities Related to Small Modular Nuclear Power Reactors, SECY-11-0079, USNRC, Washington DC, 2011.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Feasibility Study for a Risk-informed and Performance-based Regulatory Structure for Future Plant Licensing, NUREG-1860, USNRC, Washington DC, 2007.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: the Near-term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident, USNRC, Washington DC, 2011.
- Nuclear Energy Institute, B.5.b Phase 2 & 3 Submittal Guideline, NEI-06-12, Rev. 2, NEI, Washington DC, 2006.
- Nuclear Energy Institute, Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide, NEI-12-06, Rev. 0, NEI, Washington DC, 2012.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Options for Proceeding with Future Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Activities, SECY-11-0089, USNRC, Washington DC, 2011.
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Staff Requirements - SECY-11-0089 - Options for Proceeding with Future Level 3 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Activities, SECY-11-0089, USNRC, Washington DC, 2011.
- Pickard Lowe and Garrick, Inc, Seabrook Station Probabilistic Safety Assessment - Section 13.3 Risk of Two Unit Station, Prepared for Public Service Company of New Hampshire, PLG0300, Newport Beach, CA, 1983.
- K.N. Fleming, On the Issue of Integrated Risk - a PSA Practitioners Perspective, ANS International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Analysis, San Francisco, CA, 2005.
- T. Hakata, Seismic PSA method for multiple nuclear power plants in a site, Rel. Eng. Sys. Saf. 92 (2007) 883-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.022
- T.D.L. Duy, D. Vasseur, E. Serdet, Multi Units Probabilistic Safety Assessment: Methodological Elements Suggested by EDF R&D, Proceedings from Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (PSAM12), Honolulu (HI), 2014.
- S. Schroer, M. Modarres, An event classification schema for evaluating site risk in a multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment, Rel. Eng. Sys. Saf. 117 (2013) 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.005
- J. Vecchiarelli, K. Dinnie, J. Luxat, Development of a Whole-site PSA Methodology, CANDU Owners Group, COG-13-9034 R0, 2014.
- M. Dennis, M. Modarres, A. Mosleh, Framework for Assessing Integrated Site Risk of Small Modular Reactors using Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Simulation, ESREL, Zurich, Switzerland, 2015.
- I.S. Kim, Z. Musicki, G. Kelly, Internal Events Level 1 / Level 2 PRA for Spent Fuel Pool of Barakah Nuclear Power Plant, Prepared for for KEPCO E&C, ISSA Technology, Inc., Germantown, Maryland (MD), USA, 2015.
Cited by
- Feasibility of shared use of alternative AC diesel generator under dual-unit station blackout vol.54, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1359123
- Multi-unit Level 2 probabilistic safety assessment: Approaches and their application to a six-unit nuclear power plant site vol.50, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.04.005
- Recent activities in the field of Nuclear Operational Management and Nuclear Safety Engineering vol.56, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2019.1588802
- Assessment of Cesium Compound Behavior during Simultaneous Failure of Reactor Pressure Vessels and Spent Fuel Pools Using Modified ART Mod 2: Fukushima Daiichi Accident Simulation vol.2021, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9975014
- Multi-unit nuclear power plant probabilistic risk assessment: A comprehensive survey vol.213, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107782