References
- Caballero JA and Grossmann IE (2008). Rigorous flowsheet optimization using process simulators and surrogate models, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 25, 551-556.
- Cox DD, Park JS, and Singer CE (2001). A statistical method for tuning a computer code to a data base, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 37, 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(00)00057-8
- Deng H, Shao W, Ma Y, and Wei Z (2012). Bayesian metamodeling for computer experiments using the Gaussian Kriging models, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28, 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1259
- Dubourg V, Sudret B, and Deheeger F (2013). Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 33, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.02.002
- Gomes MVC, Bogle IDL, Biscaia EC, and Odloak D (2008). Using Kriging models for real-time process optimisation, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 25, 361-366.
- James G, Witten D, Hastie T, and Tibshirani R (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R, Springer, New York.
- Johnson JS, Gosling JP, and Kennedy MC (2011). Gaussian process emulation for second-order Monte Carlo simulations, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141, 1838-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.034
- Jung SY and Park C (2015). Variable selection with nonconcave penalty function on reduced-rank regression, Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 22, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.5351/CSAM.2015.22.1.041
- Kapoor A, Grauman K, Urtasun R, and Darrell T (2010). Gaussian processes for object categorization, International Journal of Computer Vision, 88, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-009-0268-3
- Kennedy MC, Anderson CW, Conti S, and O'Hagan A (2006). Case studies in Gaussian process modelling of computer codes, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91, 1301-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.028
- Kumar A (2015). Sequential tuning of complex computer models, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2013.823965
- Lee JH and Gard K (2014). Vehicle-soil interaction: testing, modeling, calibration and validation, Journal of Terramechanics, 52, 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2013.12.001
- Lee S (2015). An additive sparse penalty for variable selection in high-dimensional linear regression model, Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 22, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.5351/CSAM.2015.22.2.147
- Linkletter C, Bingham D, Hengartner N, Higdon D, and Ye KQ (2006). Variable selection for Gaussian process models in computer experiments, Technometrics, 48, 478-490. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017006000000228
- Liu YJ, Chen T, and Yao Y (2013). Nonlinear process monitoring by integrating manifold learning with Gaussian process, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 32, 1009-1014.
- Marrel A, Iooss B, van Dorpe F, and Volkova E (2008). An efficient methodology for modeling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 4731-4744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.03.026
- Moon H (2010). Design and analysis of computer experiments for screening input variables (Doctoral dissertation), Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
- Morris MD and Mitchell TJ (1995). Exploratory designs for computational experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-T
- Park JS (1994). Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 39, 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(94)90115-5
- Park JS and Baek J (2001). Efficient computation of maximum likelihood estimators in a spatial linear model with power exponential covariogram, Computers & Geosciences, 27, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00016-9
- Rohmer J and Foerster E (2011). Global sensitivity analysis of large-scale numerical landslide models based on Gaussian-Process meta-modeling, Computers & Geosciences, 37, 917-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.02.020
- Rojnik K and Naversnik K (2008). Gaussian process metamodeling in Bayesian value of information analysis: a case of the complex health economic model for breast cancer screening, Value in Health, 11, 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00244.x
- Sacks J,Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, andWynn HP (1989). Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical Science, 4, 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
- Santner TJ, Williams BJ, and Notz WI (2003). The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, Springer, New York.
- Silvestrini RT, Montgomery DC, and Jones B (2013). Comparing computer experiments for the Gaussian process model using integrated prediction variance, Quality Engineering, 25, 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2012.758284
- Slonski M (2011). Bayesian neural networks and Gaussian processes in identification of concrete properties, Computer Assisted Mechanics and Engineering Science, 18, 291-302.
- Stevenson MD, Oakley J, and Chilcott JB (2004). Gaussian process modeling in conjunction with individual patient simulation modeling: a case study describing the calculation of cost-effectiveness ratios for the treatment of established osteoporosis, Medical Decision Making, 24, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X03261561
- Surjanovic S and Bingham D (2015). Virtual Library of Simulation Experiments: test functions and datasets: emulation/prediction test problems, Retrieved January 20, 2017, from: https://www.sfu.ca/-ssurjano/emulat.html
- Tagade PM, Jeong BM, and Choi HL (2013). A Gaussian process emulator approach for rapid contaminant characterization with an integrated multizone-CFD model, Building and Environment, 70, 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.023
- Welch WJ, Buck RJ, Sacks J, Wynn HP, Mitchell TJ, and Morris MD (1992). Screening, predicting and computer experiments, Technometrics, 34, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269548
- Zhang J, Taflanidis AA, and Medina JC (2017). Sequential approximate optimization for design under uncertainty problems utilizing Kriging metamodeling in augmented input space, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 315, 369-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.042
Cited by
- Genetic association tests when a nuisance parameter is not identifiable under no association vol.24, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.29220/CSAM.2017.24.6.663