한국건설관리학회논문집 (Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management)

  • 제18권1호
  • /
  • Pages.3-16
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2005-6095(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2465-9703(eISSN)
한국건설관리학회 (Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IPD 계약은 IPD 프로젝트의 필수조건인가 - 국내외 사례조사를 통하여 -

Effect of Multyparty Contract in IPD Project Case study of USA and Korean Projects

  • Yoo, Seungeun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Kim, Taewan (Department of Architectural Engineering, City University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Yu, Jungho (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.09
  • 심사 : 2016.11.03
  • 발행 : 2017.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Integrated Project Delivery는 기존 발주방식 (설계시공일괄 발주방식, 설계시공분리 발주방식, 건설사업관리 발주방식)의 대안으로 제시되고 있다. 다수의 국외 IPD 관련 연구들은 IPD의 계약적 측면뿐만 아니라 IPD의 업무수행방식 측면에서도 IPD 연구에 접근하고 있다. 그러나 대부분의 국내 IPD 관련 연구들은 IPD의 계약적 특성에만 초점을 맞추고 이것이 심각한 문제인 것으로 간주하고 있는데, 현재 국내 규제와 법적 한계로 인해 다자간 계약이 불가능하므로 이런 국내 건설환경에서는 IPD가 도입되기 어렵다는 주장이다. 하지만 본 연구는 국내 시스템이 변화하길 기다리는 대신 IPD가 업무수행방식 측면에서 도입될 수 있음을 보여주고자 한다. 따라서 이 연구의 목표는 IPD 계약이 체결되지 않은 프로젝트들의 성과와 IPD 계약이 체결된 프로젝트의 성과를 비교함으로써 IPD 계약적 특성이 IPD를 적용한 프로젝트에서 필수조건이 아님을 보이는 것이다. 본 연구는 미국 5개 IPD 사례와 국내 1개 프로젝트의 참여자들로부터 설문데이터를 확보하여 사례조사를 두 단계로 수행하였다. 첫째로 IPD 계약을 체결하지 않은 미국 4개 사례의 IPD 특징요소 적용여부와 그에 따른 성과를 비교하고, 둘째로 IPD 계약을 체결한 미국 사례와 IPD 특징요소를 프로젝트에 도입한 국내 사례에 대해서 첫 번째 단계와 같은 내용을 비교하였다. 연구의 결과로 IPD 특성의 자유롭고 유연한 도입을 통해 국내 건설의 생산성 도모와 협업환경 조성을 통한 건설 환경의 개선 및 발주자와의 신뢰관계 구축에 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.

Integrated project delivery (IPD) is suggested as an alternative to traditional delivery methods such as design-build (DB), design-bid-build (DBB), and construction management at risk (CMR). Many foreign research studies have approached IPD not only in the contractual aspect but also the work implementation method aspect. However, most research projects in Korea have focused on the contractual aspect of IPD for asserting that the characteristics are the critical matter. The Korean institutional and legal system does not permit the multi-party agreement; therefore, it is difficult to adopt IPD in Korea's construction industry. The researchers do not wait the system to be changed, but we do identify the possibility of adopting IPD in Korea in the perspective of work implementation method, except the contractual characteristics. Thus, the goal of this research is to identify one project that does not include IPD agreement but utilizes other IPD characteristics whose contractual results have similar performance to those that utilize all characteristics of IPD including agreement. This research is expected to enhance performance of the construction project in a Korean construction environment by embracing IPD characteristics as overcoming limits and bounds of the traditional delivery method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2007). "Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide."
  2. American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2012). "IPD Case Studies."
  3. Atkinson, R. (1999). "Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria." International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), pp. 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6
  4. Becerik-Gerber, B., and Kensek, K. (2009). "Building information modeling in architecture, engineering, and construction: emerging research directions and trends." Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 136(3), pp. 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000023
  5. Brennan, Michael Dillon (2011). "Integrated Project Delivery: A Normative Model for Value Creation in Complex Military Medical Projects." University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  6. Chan Albert P. C., Scott David, and Lam Edmond W. M. (2002). "Framework of Success Criteria for Design/Build Projects." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 18(3), pp. 120-128.
  7. Chan Apc, Scott David, and Chan Apl. (2004). "Factors affecting the success of a construction project." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 153-155.
  8. Chan, P., and Leicht, R. (2014). "The Role of Integrated Project Delivery Elements in Adoption of Integral Innovations."
  9. Cheng, Renee Dale, Katy Aspenson, Amanda Salmela, and Kai. (2012). "IPD Case Studies." American Institute of Architects.
  10. CMAA. (2012). " An owners guide to project delivery methods." The Construction Management Association of America.
  11. Construction Users Round Table (CURT). (2004). "Collaboration, Integrated Information and the Project Lifecycle in Building Design, Construction and Operation."
  12. Construction Users Round Table (CURT). (2007). "Construction Strategy: CURT's Path Toward LEAN Project Delivery."
  13. Cooke-Davies, T. J. (2002). "The "real" success factors on projects." International Journal of Project Management , 20 (3), pp. 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9
  14. Daniel H, Afroz A, Teemu L, Raymond E. L, Christine L, and Prithvi P. (2014). "The Role of Integrated Project Delivery Elements in Adoption of Integral Innovations." Engineering Project Organization Conference , pp. 1-20.
  15. El Asmar, M., Hanna, A. S., and Loh, W. Y. (2015). "Evaluating Integrated Project Delivery Using the Project Quarterback Rating." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 142(1), 04015046.
  16. El Asmar, M., Hanna, A. S., and Loh, W. Y. (2013). "Quantifying Performance for the Integrated Project Delivery System as Compared to Established Delivery Systems." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000564
  17. G. Y. Yoon (2011). "Adopting IPD in Legal Aspect and Suggesting IPD Model in Domestic Market." Hanbat National University.
  18. Hanna, A. S. (2016). "Benchmark Performance Metrics for Integrated Project Delivery." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 04016040.
  19. Harvey M, Bernstein. (2013). "Lean construction." SmartMarketReport, 3(2).
  20. Hassan, Me. (2013). "Assessing the impact of lean/integrated project delivery system on final project success." George Mason University.
  21. Ilozor, Benedict D Kelly, and David J. (2012). "Building Information Modeling and Integrated Project Delivery in the Commercial Construction Industry : A Conceptual Study." Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management , (2)1, pp. 23-36.
  22. J. S. Lee, J. T. Han, S. M. Paik, W. R. Kim, H. J. Jeon, and K. H. Choi. (2012). "A Method for the Application of IPD to Domestic Construction Industry through SWOT Analysis." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, pp. 99-106.
  23. K. H. Kang, J. R. Park, J. H. Kim, and J. J. Kim. (2010). "A Study on the Introduction of IPD by the Study of Cases in the U.S." Proceedings of Architecture Institute of Korea, pp. 317-318.
  24. K. S. Shin. (2015a). CAD & Grahphics web. "Hana Integrated Data Center PreCon Service Site (1)." http://www.cadgraphics.co.kr/v5/magazine/jabjilist.asp
  25. K. S. Shin. (2015b). CAD & Grahphics web. "Hana Integrated Data Center PreCon Service Site (2)." http://www.cadgraphics.co.kr/v5/magazine/jabjilist.asp
  26. K. S. Song, J. S. Yoon, and O. C. Kwon. (2011). "A Case Analysis on the Multi-Party Contract of IPD for the BIM Acquisition Process" Proceedings of Architecture Institute of Korea, pp. 445-446.
  27. Kapogiannis, G. (2013). "A conceptual framework for project managers to improve projects performance." The University of Salford.
  28. K S Song. (2012). "The research on derived inhibitory factors, and improvement for the introduction of IPD in Domestic : Focused on the public construction projects." KangNam University.
  29. Keith, M., John, M., Robert, L., Bryan, F., and Behzad, E. (2014). "Maximizing Success in Integrated Projects An Owner;s Guide." Charles Pankow Foundation.
  30. Konchar, Mark and Sanvido, Victor. (1998). "Comparison of U . S . Project Delivery Systems." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , pp. 435-444.
  31. Lim, C. .S. and Mohamed, M. Z. (1999). "Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination." International Journal of Project Management , 17(4), pp. 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00040-4
  32. M. W. Jang, W. J. Shim, and Y. S. Ahn. (2013). "A Study on the Solution of Focused Restraints for Introduction of IPD for BIM Efficient Utilization in Domestic Construction Industry." The Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea , pp. 93-99.
  33. M. W. Jang. (2012). "A Study on the Derivation of Priorty Item for IPD Adoption in Domestic Construction Indurstry." Yeungnam University.
  34. M. W. Kim, J. S. Lee, amd J. H. Ock. (2014). "A study on IPD Guide Development for BIM Activation." Proceedings of the Society of CAD/CAM Conference, pp. 716-720.
  35. McGraw-Hill Construction. (2014). "The Business Value of BIM for Construction in Major GLobal Markets: How contractors around the world are driving innovation with Building Information Modeling." SmartMarket Report.
  36. Omran, A., Abdulbagei, M. A., and Gebril, A. O. (2012). "An Evaluation Of The Critical Success Factors For Construction Projects In Libya." The International Journal of Economic Behavior-IJEB, 2(1), pp. 17-25.
  37. Raisbeck, P., Millie, R., and Maher, A. (2010). "Assessing integrated project delivery: A comparative analysis of IPD and alliance contracting procurement routes." 26th Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2010, pp. 1019-1028.
  38. S. M. Song, Y. S. Kim, and S. Y. Jin. (2011). "An Analysis on the Perception of Domestics Construction Engineer to Introduce IPD." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , KICEM, pp. 72-80.
  39. S. M. Song. (2010). "Study of analysis on the environment and system of domestic construction industry to introduce IPD." Sungkyungkwan University.
  40. Sadeh, A., Dvir, D., and Shenhar, A. (2000). "The role of contract type in the success of R&D defence projects under increasing uncertainty." Project Management Journal, 31(3), pp. 14-21.
  41. Sun, Weida. (2013). "Factors influencing effective implementation of integrated project delivery in project team organizations as an innovation in the AEC industry." Michigan State University.
  42. Sutter Health CPMC 2020. (2016). "Van Ness and Geary Campus." Retrieved from http://vng.cpmc2020.org/.
  43. Thomsen, C., Darrington, J., Dunne, D., and Lichtig, W. (2009). "Managing integrated project delivery." Construction Management Association of America (CMAA), McLean, VA, 105.
  44. Wagemann, Claudius Schneider, and Carsten Q. (2010). "Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets: Agenda for a Research Approach and a Data Analysis Technique." Comparative Sociology, 9(3), pp. 376-396. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729838
  45. Y. J. Kim, Y. M. Lee, T. H. Shin, Y. S. Kim, and S. Y. Chin. (2009). "A Preliminary Study for Adoption of IPD to Public Sector Delivery Systems in the Korean Construction Industry." Program of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea 2009 , 29(1), pp. 609-612.
  46. Y. S. Kim (2010). "Integrated Project Delivery(IPD) = New Paradigm of Project Delivery System for BIM Based Construction Projects ; Integrated Project Delivery(IPD) System." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 54(1), pp. 37-40.