Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study of Development and Use of an Architectural Design Task Operation Model for Developing Creativity in Undergraduate Architecture Studios - With a Focus on 2,3 Year Architectural Design Studios of 1st Semester, 2016 -

창의성 개발을 위한 건축설계과제 운영모형 개발 및 활용 사례연구 - 2016학년도 1학기 2,3학년 설계스튜디오 운영을 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Do-Young (Department of Architectural Engineering, Andong National University)
  • Received : 2017.03.30
  • Accepted : 2017.06.26
  • Published : 2017.07.28
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an integrated operation model of architectural design tasks as problems to be solved and operate 2,3 year architectural design studios of $1^{st}$ semester 2016 based on the model. Some implications were made and suggested for future architectural design education professionals. Three theoretical perspectives were discussed in depth to compose the model. First, design tasks were interpreted as problems from the constructivist point of view. Second, uncertainty theories were introduced to show how to control the difficulty of design problems and present each problem to the learners in a step-by-step manner. The model suggested that the control of uncertainty(i.e., levels of difficulty) can be made in 2 consecutive steps. The first is in the design problems development stage, and the second is in the problem solving(task performance) and learning support stage, respectively. Levels of uncertainty deduced from design problems were assumed to be controlled in 4 consecutive ways in the design problems development stage; (1)learning objectives-based class theme, (2)design theme as design methodology, (3)design methods, and (4)design contexts. Finally, operation strategies of localized educational contents-based architectural design tasks were suggested. The model showed how to use locally driven natural as well as cultural assets as design subject or tools.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 안동대

References

  1. Argote, L. & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: from experience to knowledge, Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621
  2. Barrows, H. (1994). Practice-based Learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education, Springfield, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
  3. Barrows, H. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3-12.
  4. Certified Architects Act enforcement decree. (2015). http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=192820&efYd=2017 0330#0000.
  5. Choi, I. & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and Implementing a Case-based Learning Environment for Enhancing Ill-structured Problem Solving, Education Tech Research Dev., 57(1), 99-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9089-2
  6. Cross, N. (1984). Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  7. Choi, I. (2016). Three pedagogical principles to enhance students' clinical decision making, Health professions faculty development series, pedagogy & practice workshops(28 Jan.), Center for teaching and learning @UGA.
  8. Jonassen(a), D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256.
  9. Jonassen(b), D. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A Handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments, New York, Routledge.
  10. Korea Architectural Accrediting Board. (2013). A 2013 guideline book for accrediting architectural programs, http://www.kaab.or.kr/
  11. Korean Society of Educational Psychology. (2000). Dictionary of technical terms for educational psychology, http://terms.naver.com/entry. nhn?docId =1943842&cid=41989&categoryId=41989.
  12. Lee, D. (2009). A Case Study of Exploring Learners' Task Performance Process As Validated by Problem-Based Team Projects, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 25(5), 67-78.
  13. Lee, D. (2014). A Case Study of Teaching and Learning Informatization Process in Performing an Urban Revitalization Project, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 30(12), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.12.69
  14. Levin, P. (1984). Decision-making in Urban Design. In N. Cross(Eds.), Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 107-121.
  15. Low, S. & Chambers, E. (1989). Housing, culture and design, Philadelphia, University of pennsylvania press.
  16. Nelson, L. (1999). Cooperative problem-solving. In C. Reigeluth(Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory volume II, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 197-217.
  17. Rapoport, A. (1989). Foreword. In S. Low and E. Chambers(Eds.), Housing, culture and design, Philadelphia, University of pennsylvania press.
  18. Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1984). Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. In N. Cross(Eds.), Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 135-144.
  19. Saarinen, T. (1976). Environmental Planning: Planning and Behavior, Illinois, Waveland Press.
  20. Simon, H. (1984). The Structure of Ill-structured Problems. In N. Cross(Eds.), Development in Design Methodology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 146-166.
  21. Tawfik, A., Rong, H. & Choi, I. (2015). Failure to learn: towards a unified design approach for failure-based learning, Education Tech Research Dev., 63(6), 975-994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9399-0
  22. Wolfinger, D. & Stockard, J. (1997). Elementary Methods: An Integrated Curriculum, New York, Longman.