DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건축물 생애주기를 고려한 업무용 녹색건축물의 경제성 평가

An Economic Evaluation of Green Business Buildings in Consideration of Life-Cycle Costs and Benefits

  • 이성호 (강원대학교 부동산학과 대학원) ;
  • 이재수 (강원대학교 부동산학과)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.03
  • 심사 : 2017.07.06
  • 발행 : 2017.07.28

초록

The government pursues eco-friendly and low energy buildings by green building policy. Although its incentives are put into action as a part of the policy, further effort is required due to its unsatisfactory outcomes. When we consider that economic value applying green building certification is mainly affected by the free market force, the research on consumer's benefits should be done in the first step. Economic value is mainly examined by simulation studies based on Net Present Value(NPV) and Payback Period(PP) calculation. Costs consist of additional fee for green building certification, while benefits consist of floor area ratio (FAR) incentive, rent increase, tax saving such as acquisition tax and property tax, maintenance expense reduction such as energy and water resource savings. The result indicates that the payback period considering all benefits is 8 years, when the building receives excellent rating for G-SEED and the first class for energy efficiency rating system. However the payback period becomes 23 years without FAR incentive, and 26 years without any incentive. It is concluded that with no incentive, it is not possible for all costs to be paid back within 20 years of life expectancy of the building facilities. Among the incentives the FAR incentive is the most significant factor to ensure the economic feasibility of the green business building. Further studies are needed for capitalize th benefits such as productivity improvement, scholastic performance enhancement, better amenity accessibility and health effect.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF), Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS) and Choice. (2008). Energy and Equity Preparing Households for Climate Change: Efficiency, Equity, Immediacy. www.acoss.org.au.
  2. Chae, M. (2010). The Transfer System of Floor- Area-Ratio, A New Approach to Advanced Territorial Management in South Korea(II), Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements,
  3. Chae, J. & Park, S. (2016). Status of ETS and Strategies to improve in One Year After Launching : Through Comparing with EU ETS, Journal of Climate Research, 7(1), 41-48 https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2016.7.1.41
  4. Davis Langdon (2007). The Cost and Benefit of Achieving Green Buildings.
  5. Dell'lsola, A. & Kirk, S. (1981). Life Cycle Costing for Design Professionals, Mc Graw-Hill book company, New York.
  6. Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Investment, Macmillan : New York
  7. Han, H., Yoon. Jang, C. & Lee, J. (2011). Study on the Improvement of Incentive System for The Building Energy Efficiency Rating System, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 27(5), 13-20.
  8. Horne, R., Morrissey, J., O'Leary, T., Berry, M., Hamnett, S., Kellett, J. & Irvine, S. (2008). "Lifetime Affordable Housing in Australia; Assessing Life Cycle Costs," 3rd Australian Housing Researchers' Conference, Melbourne.
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC). (2014), Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report.
  10. Lee, J., Lee, C., Koh, H. & Lee, H. (2008). Value of Environment-Friendly Characteristics in Apartment Complexes, Journal of Korea Planners Association, 43(1), 101-110.
  11. Kang, B. & Yuh, O. (2014). Analysis of the Impact of G-SEED on Real Estate Price : Focused on Apartment House, The Geographical Journal of Korea, 48(1), 79-92.
  12. Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E. & Perlman, J. (2003). The Cost and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings , A report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force, Capita lE.
  13. Kats, G. (2009). "Green Buildings and Communities: Costs and Benefits," www.goodenergies.com.
  14. Kim, H., Now, D. & Song, O. (2011). Assessment on the Economic Feasibility of Green Home Project : Based on DCF Law Journal of Aggregate Buildings Law 8. 165-186.
  15. Kim, J. (2015). "Cost and Benefits of Energy-Efficient Housing, and Demand", Korea Housing Finance Corporation Publication data.
  16. Kim, J. (2016). "Real Estate Appraisal Method of the Remodeled Office Building: Focusing of Income Capitalization Method", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction Vol.32 No7
  17. Kim, T., Cho, Y. & Lee, S. (2013). A Economic Feasibility Analysis of Building Energy Efficiency Rating System, Journal of Korea Real Estate Institute Real Estate Research, 23(1), 223-243.
  18. Korea Corporate Information. (2016). Korea Price List
  19. Korea Energy Management Corporation. (2011). Guideline for Energy Saving Design of Buildings.
  20. Korea Forest Service. (2012). Standard Carbon Uptake of Major Forest Species.
  21. Korea Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. (2016). Green Building Operations Manual.
  22. Na, H., Oh, S. & Kang, B. (2004). A Study on Effects of Green Building Certification Indicator Factor on Decision of Housing Prices, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Fall Conference 24(2), 603-606.
  23. Oh. S., Kim, H. & Choi, J. (2008). Case Study on the Economic Evaluation of the Certified Green Building , Focused on the Water Resource Items, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Association Conference 24(2), 603-606.
  24. Reardon, C. (2013). Your Home: Australia's Guide to Environmentally
  25. Shin, S., Jung, J. & Lee, H. (2014). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Incentive for the Green Building Certification Criteria (GBCC) of Apartment Building Project, Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 16(6), 219-226.
  26. Seoul Metropolitan City Land Management Division. (2017). Seoul Large Office Building Market Trend Report.
  27. Seoul Metropolitan City Technical Examination Officer. (2015). Seoul City's Energy-Saving Green Building Construction Cost Guidelines
  28. Transaction price. (2016). Construction Standard