DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Economic Hardship on Domestic Violence among Low-Income Korean Households: Investigating the Moderation Effect of Debts

저소득층의 경제적 어려움과 가정폭력: 유형별 부채사용의 조절효과를 중심으로

  • Received : 2017.11.03
  • Accepted : 2017.11.30
  • Published : 2017.11.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of increased debt on the incidence of domestic violence over the two-year interval 2014-2016. To investigate Korean low-income households with economic hardships, we analyzed the 9th and the 11th waves of the Korea Welfare Panel Study, which is jointly sponsored by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs and the Institute of Social welfare, Seoul National University. The study analysis was based on data from 2,786 households with less than 60% of median income. The main study findings are as follows. First, increases in economic hardships incur domestic violence for low-income households, while increases in low-interest debt decrease the incidence of the domestic violence when controlling for economic hardships. All other things being equal, economic hardship works as a stressor and low-interest debt works as an alleviator influencing domestic violence. Second, when low-income households are experiencing economic hardships, low-interest debt fails to work as an alleviator. Under this circumstance, high-interest debt actually acts as a stressor influencing domestic violence. Thus, we can speculate that use of debt under economic hardships will occur domestic violence for low-income households. This study differs from previous studies in that it examines the effect of increase in debt on the incidence of the domestic violence across different types of debt: low interest, high interest, and credit card. We can conclude that debt can function as a stressor or an alleviator for low-income households, depending on the interest rate and the households' financial situation.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Chungnam National University

References

  1. Berger LM, Houle JN(2016) Parental debt and children's socioemotional well-being. American Academy of Pediatrics, 137(2), 1-8
  2. Bymers G(1963) Time commitment and financial position of installment debtors. Unpublished Research Report, Ithaca: Cornell University
  3. Bymers G, Rollins MA(1967) Classification systems: household expenditures data and household accounts (Vol. 1014). Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station, New York State College of Home Economics
  4. Bhutta N, Skiba, PM, Tobacman J(2014) Payday loan choices and consequences. J Money, Credit Bank 47, 1-39
  5. Chae SB(2015) The impact of household debt on housing wealth effect: evidence from micro data1). Real Estate Res 25(2), 57-70
  6. Choe HJ(2003) Development of the indexes and guidelines for evaluating financial status of the household using financial ratios. J Consum Stud 14(1), 99-121
  7. Drentea P, Reynolds JR(2015) Where does debt fit in the stress process model?. Am Sociol Assoc 5(1), 16-32
  8. Edelson D(2001) The prosecution of person who sexually exploit children in countries other than their own: A model for amending existing legislation. Fordham Intern Law J 25(2), 483-540
  9. Fox GL, Benson ML, DeMaris AA, Wyk JV(2002) Economic distress and intimate violence: testing family stress and resources theories. J Marriage Family 64, 793-807 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00793.x
  10. Hendricks G, Youmans KC, Keller J(1973) Consumer durables and installment debt: a study of American households. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan
  11. Jeong JE, Jang JH(2017) "The relationship of adolescents" experienced interparental violence, child abuse, sibling violence and perpetration/ victimization of school violence," Korean J Youth Stud 24(5), 179-209
  12. Jung JS(2001) Economic crisis amd family life. Popul Assoc Korea 24(1), 91-121
  13. Kim JR(2003) Adolescent children's domestic violence exposure & psycho-social maladjustment - focusing on middle school student children's wife abuse witnessing and child abuse victim. J Korean Home Manag Assoc 21(5), 171-180
  14. Kim JY, Oh SH, Nam, SI(2016) Prevalence and trends in domestic violence in South Korea: findings from national surveys. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(8)
  15. Kim ma(2011)
  16. Kiselica M, Morrill-Richards M(2007) Sibling maltreatment: the forgotten abuse. J Counsel Dev 85(2), 148-160 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00457.x
  17. Kinsey J, Lane S(1978) The effects of debt on perceived household welfare. Consum Affairs 12(1), 48-62 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1978.tb00632.x
  18. Krienert JL, Walsh JA(2014) Violence in USA, sibling. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, pp6939-6943
  19. Ko JY(2008) Household economic condition and couple conflict. The Korean Sociological Association Conference Proceedings, pp11-31
  20. Korea Welfare Panel Study(2016) Available from https://www.koweps.re.kr:442/main.do;jsessionid=BCDA95B1EF25 99E36069 BFFAFC19D1B8[cited ]
  21. Lewise D(1992) From abuse to violence: psycho-sociological consequences of maltreatment. J Am Child Adolescent Psych 31(3), 383-391 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199205000-00001
  22. Nathalie M, C. A(2006) Has the rise in debt made households more vulnerable?. OECD Econ Department Work Papers 21(1), 1-39
  23. Park MS, Park SY(1999) Economic hardship, child rearing attitudes and adjustment behaviors of adolescents. Korean Assoc Child Studies, 20(2), 57-72
  24. Park JY, Chae DB, Xiang M(2016) The effect of perceived economic hardship and rational consumption on private brand purchasing intention. J Distrib Res 21(4), 111-140
  25. Patel A, Balmer NJ, Pleasence P(2012) Debt and disadvantage: the experience of unmanageable debt and financial difficulty in England and Wales. International J Consum Stud 36(5), 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01071.x
  26. Richardson T, Elliott P, Roberts R(2013) The relationship between personal unsecured debt and mental and physical health: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Psychol Rev 1-21
  27. Ryan ME, Maynes ES(1969) The excessively indebted who and why. J Consumer Affairs 3(2), 107-126 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1969.tb00841.x
  28. Shen S, Sam AG, Jones E(2014) Credit card indebtedness and psychological well-being over time: empirical evidence from a household survey. J Consum Affairs 48(3), 431-456 https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12047
  29. Sim Y(1993) Impact of household debt on consumption patterns. J Consum Stud 4(2), 29-50
  30. Song HJ, Sin WR(2017) The analysis on the relationship between household debts and married women's labor supply. Korean Labor Econ Assoc 40(1), 37-68
  31. Song TJ, Bae MG, Kim KB(2005) Suicide, devorce, crime and economy. LG Economic Research Institute, pp1-62
  32. The Bank of Korea(2017) Available from http://www.bok.or.kr/main/korMain.action[cited ]
  33. Tippett N, Wolke D(2015) Aggression between siblings: Associations with the home environment and peer bullying. Aggressive Behav 41(1), 14-24 https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21557
  34. Villarrea Al(2007) Women's employment status, coercive control, and intimate partner violence in mexico. J Marriage Family 69(2), 418-434 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00374.x
  35. Vladeck DC(2013) Debt's Dilemmas: acci's annual colston wame lecture. J Consum Affairs 47(2), 358-374 https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12011
  36. Won SY(2015) The influence of households' finacial debts on income inequality. Korea Soc Policy Rev 22(3), 41-72 https://doi.org/10.17000/kspr.22.3.201509.41
  37. You SY, Park JY(2014) Debt burden and financial stress, Korea Assoc Human Ecol 23(1), 47-61 https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2014.23.1.47
  38. Voydanoff, Donnelly BW(1988) Economic distress, family coping, and quality of family life, families and economic distress. Newbury park, CA: Sage
  39. Zinman J(2009) Restricting consumer credit access: Household survey evidence on effects around the Oregon rate cap. J Banking Finance 1-11