DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction of Bending Strength of Concrete Beams with Compressive Strength of 80 MPa

80 MPa의 압축강도를 갖는 콘크리트 보의 휨강도 예측

  • Kim, Kyoung-Chul (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Yang, In-Hwan (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Joh, Chang-Bin (Structural Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
  • 김경철 (군산대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 양인환 (군산대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 조창빈 (한국건설기술연구원 구조융합연구소)
  • Received : 2016.09.21
  • Accepted : 2017.06.12
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating the bending strength of high-strength concrete beams with compressive strength of 80 MPa. The experimental parameters included nominal yielding strength of rebar with 400 and 600 MPa, rebar ratio ranging from 0.98 to 1.97%, and shear span-effective depth ratios (a/d) of 6.0 and 4.8. Experimental results were discussed regarding load-deflection relationship, ductility, bending strength, and prediction of bending strength of beams. Test results indicate that the use of high-strength rebar increased bending strength but decreased ductility. As span-effective depth ratio increased, the ductility of test beams decreased. In addition, test results of bending strength were compared with predictions from the current KCI code, Eurocode 2 and Korean Highway Design Specification (KHDC). The design code predictions for bending strength underestimated the experimental results. Therefore, the current design code predictions for bending strength of high-strength concrete beams would provide conservative design. Predictions of bending strength from KCI code using strength reduction factors and those from Eurocode 2 as well as KHDC using material factors were similar each other.

본 연구에서는 80 MPa 수준의 압축강도를 갖는 고강도 콘크리트 부재의 휨 강도 특성에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 실험변수는 SD 400 및 SD 600의 철근 공칭항복강도, 0.98~1.97%의 휨 철근비 및 부재의 전단지간-유효깊이 비(a/d)를 고려하였다. 고강도 콘크리트 보의 하중-처짐 관계, 연성, 휨강도 및 현행 설계코드에 의한 휨강도 예측값을 분석하였다. 고강도 철근의 사용은 부재의 휨강도는 증가시키는 반면에 연성을 감소시킨다. 전단지간-유효깊이 비가 증가함에 따라 연성도는 감소한다. 현행 콘크리트구조기준, Erocode 2 및 도로교설계기준에 의한 휨강도 예측값과 휨강도 측정값을 비교하였다. 고강도 콘크리트 보의 휨강도 예측값은 측정값을 과소평가하고 있으며, 보수적인 설계결과를 나타낸다. 또한, 강도감소계수를 사용하는 콘크리트구조기준에 의한 고강도 콘크리트 보의 휨강도 예측값과 재료계수를 사용하는 Erocode 2 및 도로교설계기준에 의한 휨강도 예측값은 서로 유사하게 나타난다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국토교통과학기술진흥원

References

  1. Russell, H. G., Miller, R. A., Ozyildirim, H. C., and Tadros, M. K., Compilation and Evaluation of Results from High-Performance Concrete Bridge Projects, Volume I: Final Report, Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-056, Federal Highway Administration, Georgetown Pike, McLean, 2006, pp. F27-F31.
  2. Ashour, S. A., "Effect of Compressive Strength and Tensile Reinforcement Ratio on Flexural Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Beams", Engineering Structures, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2000, pp. 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00135-7
  3. Kaminska, M. E., "High-Strength Concrete and Steel Interaction in RC Members", Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2002, pp. 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00011-7
  4. Lambott, H. and Taerwe, L. R., "Deflection and Cracking of High-Strength Concrete Beams and Slabs", High-Strength Concrete, Second International Symosium(SP 121), American Concrete Institute, Vol. 121, 1990, pp. 109-128.
  5. Mast, R. F., Dawood, M., Rizkalla, S. H., and Zia, P., "Flexural Strength Design of Concrete Beams Reinforced with High-Strength Steel Bars", ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 105, No. 5, 2013, pp. 570-577.
  6. Moon, D. Y., "Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with High-Strength Steel Bars", Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 107-113. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.6.107
  7. Wang, I. S. and Lee, S. H., "An Application of 800 kgf/$cm^2$ High Strength Concrete on High Rise Building", Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2003, pp. 87-92. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2003.15.1.087
  8. Cho, H. W., Bang, J. W., Han, B. C., and Kim, Y. Y., "Flexural Experiments on Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with ECC and High-Strength Rebar", Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2011, pp. 503-509. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2011.23.4.503
  9. Rashid, M. A. and Mansur, M. A., "Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Beams in Flexure", ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 3, 2005, pp. 462-471.
  10. Wu, Z., "Behavior of High-Strength Concrete Members Under Pure Flexure and Axial-Flexural Loading", PhD Thesis, Dissertation of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Releigh, North Carolina, 2006.
  11. Hong, G. H., "Flexural Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Beams with High-Strength Concrete and Reinforcing Bars", Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2011, pp. 49-56.
  12. Jang, S. J., Kang, S. W., and Yun, H. D., "Cracking Behavior and Flexural Performance of RC Beam with Strain Hardening Cement Composite and High-Strength Reinforcing Bar", Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2015, pp. 37-44. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2015.27.1.037
  13. Kang. S. H., "An Experimental Study on the Flexural Behavior of High Strength Concrete Members with High Tension Bar", Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1995, pp. 107-117.
  14. Jang, I. Y., Park, H. G., Kim, S. S., Kim, J. H., and Kim, Y. G., "On the Ductility of High-Strength Concrete Beams", International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2008, pp. 115-122. https://doi.org/10.4334/IJCSM.2008.2.2.115
  15. Yang, I. H., Hwang, C. S., Kim, K. C., and Joh, C. B., "An Experimental Study on Structural Behavior of High-strength Concrete Members with Compressive Strength of 80 MPa Subjected to Flexure", Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2017, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2017.21.4.001
  16. Korea Concrete Institute, Concrete Structure Design Code and Commentary, Kimoondang, Seoul, 2012, pp. 96-103.
  17. ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirments for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, 2014.
  18. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, American Association of State Highway and Transportations Officials, 3rd edition, Washigton, D. C, 2004.
  19. ACI Committee 363, Report on High-Strength Concrete, Report No. ACI 363R-10, 2010.
  20. CEN, Eurocode 2 : Design for Standardization, Report No. EN 1992-1-1, 2004.
  21. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), Korea Bridge Design Specifications - Limit State Design, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2012.
  22. Lee, J. H., Lim, K. S., and Hwang, D. K., "Compressive Stress Distribution of Concrete for Performance-Based Design Code", Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2011, pp. 365-376. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2011.23.3.365