Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers

  • Chung, Kyu Jin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.02.25
  • Accepted : 2017.02.28
  • Published : 2017.05.22
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Kliewer MA, Freed KS, DeLong DM, et al. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1731-5. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841731
  2. Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:848-54. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0782
  3. Publishing Research Consortium. Peer review in scholarly journals: an international study into the perspective of the scholarly community [Internet]. Bristol, UK: Mark Ware Consulting Ltd; 2017 [cited 2017 Feb 25]. Available from: http://publishingresearchconsortium.com/index.php/112- prc-projects/research-reports/peer-review-in-scholarly-journals-research-report/142-peer-review-in-scholarly-journalsperspective-of-the-scholarly-community-an-internationalstudy.
  4. Lee SY. Tips on writing and reviewing articles as a non-english speaking medical doctor. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42:1-3. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.1.1

Cited by

  1. Peer review and roles of the reviewer vol.20, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00787