농촌지도와개발 (Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development)

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.99-115
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1976-3107(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-3705(eISSN)
한국농촌지도학회 (Korean Society of Agricultural Extension)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

벼 무논직파재배기술 사용확산의 시스템 다이내믹스 동태분석 -시범단지 사례를 중심으로-

A System Dynamics Analysis on Use Diffusion of Rice Wet Direct Seeding Technology - Focused on a Case of Pilot Village -

  • 김성섭 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 농업경제학과) ;
  • 정우석 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 농업경제학과) ;
  • 하지희 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 농업경제학과) ;
  • 서상택 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 농업경제학과)
  • Kim, Seongsup (Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong, U Seok (Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Ha, Jihee (Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Sangtaek (Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.18
  • 심사 : 2017.06.10
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze potential adoption rates and reusing patterns of the new rice direct seeding technology. The model constructed and employed in this study is a system dynamics model of farmer adoption and reusing patterns for this new technology over time. The model incorporates a causal loop diagram that explains interactions among rice cultivation subsystems with feedback loops and further attempts to build a causal loop model with stock-flow diagram for computer simulation. As one example of how the model can be used to provide insight to rice farmers, simulations are run over varying levels on the cultivation process of rice. The major finding is to demonstrate the utility of system dynamics simulation methodology in aiding the rice wet direct seeding farmers' decision making.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김상현, & 송영미. (2017). 오픈소스: 소프트웨어 확산에 영향을 주는 조직필요성 및 기술필요성 요인과 정부지원의 조절효과에 대한 실증연구. Information Systems Review, 12(3), 89-116.
  2. 김웅, 이기권, 유영석, & 최돈우. (2014). 오디 시설재배조기 확산을 위한 수용요인분석. 농촌지도와 개발, 21(2), 29-56.
  3. 김종인, 길청순, 김기태, & 김원경. (2013). 마을단위 농업경영체 조직전략 및 운영요소 도출 연구. 농촌지도와 개발, 20(3), 777-822.
  4. 나윤규, 홍병숙, & 강성민. (2008). 인터넷 쇼핑에서의 지각된 가치와 위험이 패션상품 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 32(8), 1213-1225. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.8.1213
  5. 서현석, 김준호, & 이봉규. (2010). IPTV서비스의 수용과 확산을 위한 정부정책 프레임워크 분석. 한국인터넷정보학회, 11(5), 37-58.
  6. 정구현, 최영찬, 박흔돈, & 장익훈. (2010). 농업인의 혁신기술 수용 및 지속적 사용 변수간의 관계. 농업교육과 인적자원개발, 42(3), 109-137.
  7. 최영찬. (2013). 농식품산업의 변화와 연구.지도사업의 과제: 지역R&D와 현장지도의 강화를 위해. 농촌지도와 개발, 20(4), 839-869.
  8. Abdullah, F., & Ward. R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (getamel) by analyzing commonly used external factors. Computer in Human Behavior, 56, 238-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
  9. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
  10. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
  11. Aizstrauta, D., Ginters, E., & Eroles, M-A. P. (2015). Applying theory of diffusion of innovations to evaluate technology acceptance and sustainability. Procedia Computer Science, 43, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.12.010
  12. Ajili, A., Salehi, S., Kurosh, RM., Hayati, D., & Karbalaee, F. (2012). Estimating the Model of investigating attitude and intention in the usage of variable rate irrigation technology. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2(3), 542-556. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2012/1267
  13. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Person-ality, and Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
  14. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  15. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceiver behavioral control, selfefficiency, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
  16. Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 1-15.
  17. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001a). Understanding information system continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351.370.
  18. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001b). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems, 32, 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00111-7
  19. Colesca, S. E., & Dobrica, L. (2008). Adoption and use of e-government services: the case of romania. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 6(3), 204-217.
  20. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  21. Fanta, G. B., Pretorius, L., & Erasmus, L. (2016). A system dynamics model of ehealth acceptance: A sociotechnical perspective. Paper presented at the International Association for Management of Technology, JAMOT Conference Proceeding, 259-271.
  22. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  23. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  24. Forrester, J. F. (1987). Lessons from system dynamics modeling. System Dynamics Review, 3(2): 136-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260030205
  25. Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11), 1762-1800. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310495456
  26. Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yu, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005
  27. Islam, M., & Kellermanns, F. (2006). Firm- and individual-level determination of scorecard usage. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 5(2), 181-207. https://doi.org/10.1506/74LJ-CMWM-FUAD-NMUT
  28. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Todd, P. A. (1997). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web. Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(2), 59-88.
  29. Jeffres, L., & Atkin, D. (1996). Predicting use of technologies for communication and consumer needs. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40, 318-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364356
  30. Kim, D. H. (2000). A simulation method of cognitive maps. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on System Thinking in Management, Deakin University, Australia.
  31. Kishore, R., Lee, J., & Mclean, E. R. (2001). The role of personal innovativeness and self-efficacy information technology acceptance: An extension of tam with notions of risk. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems(ICIS), Paper 57, 469-474.
  32. Lee, D., Rhee, Y., & Dunham, R. B. (2009). The role of organizational and individual characteristics in technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(7), 623-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310902963969
  33. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerelle, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  34. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaption of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17(5), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6
  35. Martin, I. M., & Stewart, D. W. (2001). The differential impact of goal congruency on attitudes, intentions, and the transfer of brand equity. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.4.471.18912
  36. Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2006). International encyclopaedia of ergonomics and human factors (3119-3121). Karwowski, W. (ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.
  37. Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
  38. Powersim Software AS. (2016). Powersim studio user's guide. Dreggen, Bergen, Norway.
  39. Rogers, E. M. (1995, 2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  40. Sandstrom, A. R. (2008). Ritual economy among the Nahua of Northern Veracruz. Mexico. Dimensions of Ritual Economy, edited by E. Christian Wells and Patricia A. McAnany. Research in Economic Anthropology, 27. JAI Press, Bingley, UK.
  41. Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
  42. Shih, C. F., & Venkatesh, A. (2004). Beyond adoption: Development and application of a use-diffusion model. Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.59.24029
  43. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: System thinking and modeling for complex world. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
  44. Sterman, J. D. (2001). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Japanese Journal of System Dynamics, 2, 79-96.
  45. Taylor, M., Wang, W., & Banan, M. (1996). Internetwork mobility: The CDPD approach. New York: Prentice Hall.
  46. Teo, T., Su Luan, W., & Sing, C. C. (2008). A crosscultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of the technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265-280.
  47. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). The effect of post-adoption beliefs on the expectationconfirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001
  48. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  49. Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasraton, B. (2008). Understanding citizen's continuance intention to use e-government website: A composite view of technology acceptance model and computer self-efficacy. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 6(1), 55-64.
  50. Ye, C., Seo, D. B., Desouza, K. C., Sangareddy, S. P., & Jha, S. (2008). Influences of IT substitutes and user experience on post-adoption user switching: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2115-2132.
  51. Zhu, K., Kromer, K., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557-1776. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487

피인용 문헌

  1. 아열대 작물의 국내 재배동향 및 주산지 분석 vol.21, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2020.21.12.524