DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improving the linear flexibility distribution model to simultaneously account for gravity and lateral loads

  • Received : 2016.11.22
  • Accepted : 2017.02.12
  • Published : 2017.07.25

Abstract

There are two methods to model the plastification of members comprising lumped and distributed plasticity. When a reinforced concrete member experiences inelastic deformations, cracks tend to spread from the joint interface resulting in a curvature distribution; therefore, the lumped plasticity methods assuming plasticity is concentrated at a zero-length plastic hinge section at the ends of the elements, cannot model the actual behavior of reinforced concrete members. Some spread plasticity models including uniform, linear and recently power have been developed to take extended inelastic zone into account. In the aforementioned models, the extended inelastic zones in proximity of critical sections assumed close to connections are considered. Although the mentioned assumption is proper for the buildings simply imposed lateral loads, it is not appropriate for the gravity load effects. The gravity load effects can influence the inelastic zones in structural elements; therefore, the plasticity models presenting the flexibility distribution along the member merely based on lateral loads apart from the gravity load effects can bring about incorrect stiffness matrix for structure. In this study, the linear flexibility distribution model is improved to account for the distributed plasticity of members subjected to both gravity and lateral load effects. To do so, a new model in which, each member is taken as one structural element into account is proposed. Some numerical examples from previous studies are assessed and outcomes confirm the accuracy of proposed model. Also comparing the results of the proposed model with other spread plasticity models illustrates glaring error produced due to neglecting the gravity load effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Haddad, M.S. and Wight, J.S. (1988), "Relocating beam plastic hinging zones for earthquake resistant design of reinforced concrete buildings", ACI Struct. J., 85(2), 123-133.
  2. Alva, G.M.S. and De Cresce El, A.L.H. (2010), "Application of lumped dissipation model in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete structures", Eng. Struct., 32(4), 974-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.024
  3. Anderson, J.C. and Townsend, W.H. (1977), "Models for RC frames with degrading stiffness", J. Struct. Div., 103(12), 2361-2376.
  4. Aoyama, H. and Sugano, T. (1968), A Generalized Inelastic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Based on the Tests of Members, Recent Researches of Structural Mechanics, Contributions in Honor of the 60th Birthday of Prof. Y. Tsuboi, Uno Shoten, Tokyo, Japan, 15-30.
  5. Birely, A.C., Lowes, L.N. and Lehman, D.E. (2012), "A model for the practical nonlinear analysis of reinforced-concrete frames including joint flexibility", Eng. Struct., 34, 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.003
  6. Caltrans (1988), Bridge Design Specifications, California Department of Transportation, Division of Structures, Sacramento, U.S.A.
  7. Clough, R.W. (1966), "Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, U.S.A.
  8. FEMA273 (1997), NEHRP Guideline for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, U.S.A.
  9. Giberson, M.F. (1967), The Response of Nonlinear Multi-Story Structures Subjected to Earthquake Excitation, California Institute of Technology.
  10. Habibi, A. and Moharrami, H. (2010), "Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of reinforced concrete frames", Fin. Elem. Anal. Des., 46(7), 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2010.02.005
  11. Habibi, A.R. (2007), "Optimal seismic performance-based design of 2D RC frameworks", Ph.D. Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
  12. Hajjar, J.F., Molodan, A. and Schiller, P.H. (1998), "A distributed plasticity model for cyclic analysis of concrete-filled steel tube beam-columns and composite frames", Eng. Struct., 20(4), 398-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00020-5
  13. Inel, M. and Ozmen, H.B. (2006), "Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings", Eng. Struct., 28(11), 1494-1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017
  14. Iu, C.K. (2016), "Nonlinear analysis of the RC structure by higherorder element with the refined plastic hinge", Comput. Concrete, 17(5), 579-596. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.5.579
  15. Izadpanah, M. and Habibi, A. (2015), "Evaluating the spread plasticity model of IDARC for inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 56(2), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.2.169
  16. Kim, S.P. and Kurama, Y.C. (2008), "An alternative pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic displacement demands", Eng. Struct., 30(12), 3793-3807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.008
  17. King, W., White, D. and Chen, W. (1992), "Second-order inelastic analysis methods for steel-frame design", J. Struct. Eng., 118(2), 408-428. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:2(408)
  18. Kunnath, S.K. and Reinhorn, A.M. (1989), Inelastic Three-Dimensional Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures (IDARC-3D), National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, U.S.A.
  19. Lee, C.L. and Filippou, F.C. (2009), "Efficient beam-column element with variable inelastic end zones", J. Struct. Eng., 135(11), 1310-1319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000064
  20. Mander, J.B. (1984), "Seismic design of bridge piers", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
  21. McGuire, W. (1993), Plastic Hinge Based Methods for Advanced Analysis and Design of Steel Frames: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art, Structural Stability Research Council, Bethlehem, Elsevier.
  22. Nguyen, P.C. and Kim, S.E. (2014), "Distributed plasticity approach for time-history analysis of steel frames including nonlinear connections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 100, 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.012
  23. Otani, S. and Sozen, M.A. (1972), Behavior of Multistory Reinforced Concrete Frames During Earthquakes, University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, U.S.A.
  24. Park, R. and Paulay, T. (1975), Reinforced Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Park, Y.J. and Ang, A.H.S. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 111(4), 722-739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  26. Park, Y.J., Reinhorn, A.M. and Kunnath, S.K. (1987), IDARC: Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame-Shear-Wall Structures.
  27. Reinhorn, A.M., Roh, H., Sivaselvan, M., Kunnath, S.K., Valles, R.E., Madan, A., Li, C., Lobo, R. and Park, Y.J. (2009), IDARC 2D Version 7.0: A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of Structures, MCEER Technical Report-MCEER-09-0006, University at Buffalo-the State University of New York, U.S.A.
  28. Roh, H., Reinhorn, A.M. and Lee, J.S. (2012), "Power spread plasticity model for inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete structures", Eng. Struct., 39, 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.019
  29. SeismoStruct (2016), A Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures.
  30. Stone, W.C. and Cheok, G.C. (1989), Inelastic Behavior of Full-Scale Bridge Columns Subjected to Cyclic Loading, NIST Building Science Series 166, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, U.S.A.
  31. Takizawa, H. (1973), "Strong motion response analysis of reinforced concrete buildings", Concrete J., 11(2), 10-21.
  32. White, D.W. (1993), "Plastic-hinge methods for advanced analysis of steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 24(2), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(93)90059-2
  33. Zhao, X.M., Wu, Y.F. and Leung, A. (2012), "Analyses of plastic hinge regions in reinforced concrete beams under monotonic loading", Eng. Struct., 34, 466-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.016

Cited by

  1. A new procedure for post-buckling analysis of plane trusses using genetic algorithm vol.40, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.40.6.817