References
- AAAS. (1989). Science for All American. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
- Brock, R. (2015). Intuition and insight: two concepts that illuminate the tacit in science education. Studies in Science Education, 51(2), 127-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2015.1049843
- Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education: Harvard University Press.
- Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
- Clement, J. (1994). Use of physical intuition and imagistic simulation in expert problem solving. In Tirosh, D. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit knowledge, (pp. 204-244). Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
- Clement, J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding 'anchoring conceptions' for grounding instruction on students' intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 554-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110507
- Cushing, J. T. (1998). Philosophical concepts in physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Einstein, A., & Seelig, C. (1995). Ideas and opinions. New York: Crown Publishers.
- Epstein, S. (1998). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In D. Barbone, M. Hersen, & V. Van Hasselt (Eds.), Advanced personality, (pp. 211-238). New York: Springer Science+ Business Media.
- Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
- Fensham, P., & Marton, F. (1992). What has happened to intuition in science education? Research in Science Education, 22(1), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356886
- Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach(Vol. 5): Springer Science & Business Media.
- Georgiou, H., & Sharma, M. D. (2012). University students' understanding of thermal physics in everyday context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1119-1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9320-1
- Greene, B. (1999). The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. New York: Vintage Books.
- Hafner, R., & Stewart, J. (1995). Revising explanatory models to accommodate anomalous genetic phenomena: Problem solving in the "context of discovery". Science Education, 79(2), 111-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790202
- Han, S-K. (2010). Context of Discovery and Context of Justification. Research in Eastern and Western Philosophies [동서철학연구], 58, 441-463.
- Holton, G. J., & Brush, S. G. (2001). Physics, the human adventure: from Copernicus to Einstein and beyond. Rutgers University Press.
- Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2006). Context of discovery versus context of justification and Thomas Kuhn. Revisiting discovery and justification, 119-131.
- Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Nobel prize lecture, 8, 351-401.
- Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2014). The nature of science. Seoul: Bookshill.
- Kim, Y. C. (2002). The creative problem solving: theories, developments, and classes of creativity [창의적 문제해결: 창의력 이론, 개발과 수업]. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
- Kroning, P. (2005). Auch Genies konnen irren...: Glücksfalle und Fehlurteile der Wissenschaft [오류와 우연의 과학사]. (Lee, Dong-Jun [이동준]) Seoul: Imagobook [이마고]. (Original work published 2003).
- Kushnir, T., Gopnik, A., Schulz, L., & Danks, D. (2003). Inferring hidden causes. In R. Alterman, & D. Kirsh (Eds), Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 699-703). Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/141.pdf.
- Larsson, C., & Tibell, L. A. (2015). Challenging Students' Intuitions-the Influence of a Tangible Model of Virus Assembly on Students' Conceptual Reasoning About the Process of Self-Assembly. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 663-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9446-6
- Lee, J. (2005). Intuition and Construction in Kant. Philosophical Investigation 17, 285-327.
- Marton, F., Fensham, P., & Chaiklin, S. (1994). A Nobel’s eye view of scientific intuition: discussions with the Nobel prize-winners in physics, chemistry and medicine(1970-86). International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069940160406
- Medawar, P. B. (1969). Induction and intuition in scientific thought. London: Routledge.
- Ministry of Education. (2009). 2009 revised curriculum -Science-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised curriculum -Science-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
- Na, J. (2014). The Roles and Features of Everyday Experience in Elementary Dissertation. Seoul National University.
- National Institute of Korean Language. (2008). In Standard Korean Language Dictionary [표준국어대사전]. Retrieved May 23, 2017, from http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/main.jsp.
- Noh, Y. J. (2004). The way of logical thinking [논리적 사고의 길]. Kwang-ju: Cheonam University Press.
- Oh, P. S. (2008). Comparison of Hypotheses-Formation Processes between an Earth Scientist and Undergraduate Students: A Case Study about a Typhoon's Anomalous Path. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(6), 649-663.
- Park, H. K., & Kwon, J. S. (1991). Current research papers on physics problem solving, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 11(2), 67-77.
- Park, J., & Han, S. (2002). Using deductive reasoning to promote the change of students' conceptions about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 593-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074026
- Piaget, J. (1971). The Child's conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
- Poincare, H. (1907). The Value of Science. (G. B. Halsted, Trans). New York: The Science Press. (Original work published 1905).
- Poincare, H. (1914). Science and method. (F. Maitland, Trans). London, Edinburgh, Dublin, & New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons. (Original work published 1908).
- Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge, towards a post critical epistemology. London: Routledge.
- Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London and New York: Routledge.
- Raidl, M. H., & Lubart, T. I. (2001). An empirical study of intuition and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.2190/34QQ-EX6N-TF8V-7U3N
- Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world's most creative people. Boston and New York: A Mariner Book.
- Salmon, W. (1967). The foundations of scientific inference. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab, & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science, (pp.1-103). Massachussetts: Harvard University Press.
- Seo, K-H. (2004). An Alternative Approach to Investigating Students’ Thinking: Focusing on the Piaget’s Clinical Interview. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(2), 163-183.
- Shepard, R. N. (1978). Externalization of mental images and the act of creation. In B. S. Zandawa, & W. E. Lottman (Eds), Visual learning, thinking, and communication, (pp.133-189). New York: Academic Press.
- Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (1996). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: the case of 'more of A--more of B'. International Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180602
- Stewart, J., & Hafner, R. (1991). Extending the conception of "problem" in problem-solving research. Science Education, 75(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750110
- Tallant, J. (2013). Intuitions in physics. Synthese, 190(15), 2959-2980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0113-z
- Tallant, J. (2014). Metaphysics, Intuitions and Physics. Ratio, 28(3), 286-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12074
- Wild, K. W. (1938). Intuition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Yair, Y., & Yair, Y. (2004). "Everything comes to an end": An intuitive rule in physics and mathematics. Science Education, 88(4), 594-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10142