Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics (대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구)

The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics (대한수학교육학회)
권호 표지

Principles and Methods for Critical Mathematics Education: An Explorative Study of a Program

비판적 수학교육의 원리와 방법 탐색: 프로그램 개발을 위한 기초연구로서

  • Received : 2017.10.16
  • Accepted : 2017.11.18
  • Published : 2017.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Due to globalization, diversification, and informatization, modern society confronts change and crisis in a variety of areas such as economy, politics, and culture. In that context, mathematics educators seek for how to reform school mathematics for democratic and just society. This research proposes critical mathematics education as an alternative model of school mathematics for democratic society. In particular, this research is an explorative study to construct a model of critical mathematics education program. For the purpose, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify goals, contents, and methods of teaching and learning, and method of assessment for critical mathematics education. We checked the validity of the model by using the cases of critical mathematics education. Since this research is explorative in the regard that the model is based on theoretical literatures, further research is necessary to extend the model through design research in school context.

세계화, 다원화, 정보화, 과학기술의 발달에 따라 현대사회는 사회, 경제, 문화 등 광범위한 영역에서 급격한 변화를 겪고 있다. 이러한 사회적 변화에 따라 보다 민주적이고 평등한 미래사회로의 발전에 기여하는 수학교육방안의 탐색이 요구된다. 본 연구는 비판이론으로부터 발달한 비판적 교육이론 및 비판적 수학교육이론에 대한 문헌분석을 통해 비판적 수학교육의 목표, 교수-학습 내용 및 방법을 도출하여 비판적 수학교육 프로그램 개발에 적용할 수 있는 모델을 구성하였다. 또한 문헌분석에 기초하여 개발한 프로그램 모델을 비판적 수학교육 사례에 적용하여 모델의 타당성을 확인하였다. 마지막으로 비판적 수학교육 프로그램 모델 개발에 기초한 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부(2015). 수학과 교육과정 교육부 고시 제2015-74호. 서울: 교육부.
  2. 권오남, 박정숙, 오국환(2013). 비판적 수학교육에 대한 문헌 분석 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈A 수학교육, 52(3), 319-334.
  3. 미래창조과학부(2015). 미래이슈 분석 보고서. 경기: 미래창조과학부.
  4. 송륜진, 주미경(2011). 다문화수학교육의 원리와 방법, 교육과정평가연구, 14(2), 101-128.
  5. 우정호 (2010). 수학 학습-지도 원리와 방법. 서울: 서울대학교출판문화원
  6. 윤응진(1997). 비판적 교육학에 관한 연구. 신학연구, 38, 279-318.
  7. 이시용(1997). 비판이론에 관한 고찰. 교육논총, 14, 137-156.
  8. 임승리(2014). 다문화 수학수업의 적용에 따른 학생들의 인식의 변화. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.
  9. 정수용, 주미경, 송륜진(2014). 수학교과서 속 수학자들에 대한 비판적 분석-융합적 협업으로서 다문화교육 관점에서. 교과교육학연구, 18(2), 441-470.
  10. 한용진 (2010). 세계화 3.0 시대의 교육론. 교육정치학 연구, 17(4), 203-216.
  11. 홍은영, 최치원 (2014). 세계화교육 - 비판적 성찰과 새로운 가능성 탐구를 향한 시론적 연구. 담론 201, 17(4), 85-106.
  12. Alro, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: intention, reflection, critique. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  13. Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? power, policy, and practice in mathematics education, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/749562
  14. Apple, M. W. (1995). Taking power seriously: new direction in equity in mathematics education and beyond. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New direction for equity in mathematics education (pp. 329-348). NY: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751231
  16. Bohl, J. V. (1998). Critical mathematics education: An exploration of existing curricular materials. Unpublished Master dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  17. Charles, R. (2005). Big ideas and understandings as the foundation for elementary and middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 7(3), 9-21.
  18. D'Ambrosio, U. (1997). Ethnomathematics and its place in history and pedagogy of mathematics. In Powell, A. B. & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 13-24). NY: SUNY Press.
  19. Davis, P. J.(1993). Applied mathematics as social contract. In S. Restivo, J. P. Van Bendegem, & R. Fischer (Eds.), Math worlds: philosophical and social studies of mathematics and mathematics education (pp. 183-194). New York, NY: Free Press.
  20. Dewey, J. (2007). 민주주의와 교육 (이홍우 역), 서울: 교육과학사. (영어 원작은 1916년 출판)
  21. Ernest, P. (2010). 수학교육철학 (강문봉, 백석윤, 이중권, 장혜원 역), 서울: 경문사. (영어 원작은 1991년 출판)
  22. Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In: D.W. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching and learning of mathematics. (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.
  23. Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. (2001). 계몽의 변증법. (김유동 역), 서울: 문학과 지성사. (독어 원작은 1944년 출판)
  24. Frankenstein, M. (1983). Critical mathematics education: an application of Paulo Freire's epistemology. Journal of Education, 165(4), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748316500403
  25. Frankenstein, M. (2012). Beyond math content and process: proposals for underlying aspects of social justice education. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversation with educators (pp. 49-62). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  26. Freire, P. (2002). 페다고지. (남경태 역), 서울: 그린비. (영어 원작은 1970년 출판).
  27. Freire, P. (2002). 희망의 교육학. (교육문화연구회 역), 서울: 아침이슬. (영어 원작은 1994년 출판).
  28. Freire, P. (2002). 프레이리의 교사론. (교육문화연구회 역), 서울: 아침이슬. (영어 원작은 1998년 출판).
  29. Freire, P. (2010). 교육과 의식화. (채광석 역), 서울: 중원문화. (영어 원작은 1973년 출판).
  30. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, latino school, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034699
  31. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  32. Gutstein, E. (2012). Reflections on teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in urban school. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversations with educators (pp. 63-78). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  33. Ju, M. K., Moon, J. E., & Song, R. J. (2016). History of mathematics in Korean mathematics textbooks: Implication for using ethnomathematics in culturally diverse school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1321-1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9647-0
  34. Keesing-Styles, L. (2000). An ecological approach to practicum assessment. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 5, 71-81.
  35. Keesing-Styles, L. (2003). The relationship between critical pedagogy and assessment in teacher education. Retrieved from http://www.radicalpedagogy.org/radicalpedagogy/The_Relationship_between_Critical_Pedagogy_and_Assessment_in_Teacher_Education.html
  36. Osler, J. (2007). A guide for integrating issues of social and economic justice into mathematics curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.radicalmath.org/docs/SJMathGuide.pdf.
  37. Peterson, B. & Neill, M (2012). Alternatives to standardized test. In W. Au & B. Temple (Eds.), Pencil down: rethinking high-stakes testing and accountability in public schools (pp. 218-230). Milwaukee, WI: A rethinking schools publication.
  38. Powell, A. B. (2012). The historical development of critical mathematics education. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversations with educators (pp. 21-34). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  39. Restivo, S. (1993). The social life of mathematics. In S. Restivo, J. P. Van Bendegem, & R. Fischer (Eds). Math worlds: philosophical and social studies of mathematics and mathematics education (pp. 247-278). New York: SUNY.
  40. Romberg, T. A. (1992). Further thoughts on the standards: a reaction to Apple. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 432-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/749563
  41. Schowab, K. (2014). The fouth industrial revolution. Geneva, Switzerland:World Economic Forum.
  42. Skovsmose, O. (1985). Toward a philosophy of critical mathematical education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
  43. Skovsmose, O. (2011). An invitation to critical mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  44. Skovsmose, O. (2012). Critical mathematics education: a dialogical journey. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversations with educators (pp. 35-47). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  45. UNESCO. (2015). Position paper on education Post-2015. UNESCO.
  46. World Economic Forum (2015). New vision for education: Unlocking the potential of technology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Retrieved rom http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
  47. Youngman, F. (1986). Adult education and socialist pedagogy. London: Croom Helm.
  48. Zaslavsky, C. (1996). The multicultural math classroom: bringing in the world. NH: Heinemann.
  49. Zinn, H. (1995). Why students should study history. In B. Bigelow, L. Christensen, S. Karp, B. Miner, & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking our classroom: teaching for equity and justice. Milwaukee: Rethinking Schools.