Fashion, Industry and Education

The Costume Culture Association (복식문화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Millennials' Online Apparel Purchase Decisions through Social Interactions

  • Son, Jihyeong (Dept. of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University) ;
  • Sun, Jing (Dept. of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University) ;
  • Hughes, Amy (Dept. of Apparel, Merchandising, Design and Textiles, Washington State University)
  • Received : 2017.04.26
  • Accepted : 2017.06.16
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore how Millennials mitigate perceived risks that occur during online apparel purchasing decisions through social interactions based on social learning theory. Also, this research investigates concerns generated from interactions with others when consuming apparel online. An exploratory investigation was undertaken with 78 undergraduate students using an online survey that included open and closed questions. Qualitative data revealed positive relationships between consumers' social interactions and purchases of apparel products online. Specifically, information searches through social interactions with trusted individuals utilizing online channels were found to validate purchasing decisions and alleviate perceived risks with purchasing apparel products online. However, consumers were also concerned with certain interactions due to the lack of credibility regarding reviewers, channels, and conflicting information. These findings provide an insight into millennial consumers' learning processes through consumer-to-consumer interactions in social media environments for apparel purchases. As online and mobile shopping along with consumers' social media usage for interacting continue to increase, these research findings guide retailers how to turn their attention to investing and utilizing these channels to enhance millennial consumers' positive purchasing experiences online.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghekyan, M., Forsythe, S., Suk Kwon, W., & Chattaraman, V. (2012). The role of product brand image and online store image on perceived risks and online purchase intentions for apparel. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(3), 325-331. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.03.006
  2. Angela, H., & Neil, T. (2017). Understanding how Millennial shoppers decide what to buy: digitally connected unseen journeys. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(5). doi:10.1108/IJRDM-11-2016-0206
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  5. Bezes, C. (2016). Comparing online and in-store risks in multichannel shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(3), 284-300. doi:10.1108/IJRDM-02-2015-0019
  6. Cheung, C. M. K., Liu, I. L. B., & Lee, M. K. O. (2015). How online social interactions influence customer information contribution behavior in online social shopping communities: A social learning theory perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2511-2521. doi:10.1002/asi.23340
  7. Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008
  8. Cui, G., Lui, H.-K., & Guo, X. (2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39-58. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415170102
  9. Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women's apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22. doi:10.1177/0887302X9000800202
  10. Forsythe, S., & Shi, B. (2003). Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 867-875. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00273-9
  11. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436-445. doi:10.2307/798843
  12. Holloway, K., Polaschek, N., & Pool, L. (2010). DIFE: A New Model in Undergraduate Nursing Education. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(9), 512-516. doi:10.3928/01484834-20100524-03
  13. HookLogic. (2016). White Paper: The Apparel Shopper, Part 1. Retrieved March 20, 2017, from http://www6.hooklogic.com/rsx-apparel-whitepaper-1
  14. Kulmala, M. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth in consumer fashion blogs. A netnographic study. (Master's thesis), University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
  15. Kushwaha, T., & Shankar, V. (2013). Are multichannel customers really more valuable? The moderating role of product category characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 67-85. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0297
  16. Lee, H.-H., Kim, J., & Fiore, A. M. (2010). Affective and cognitive online shopping experience effects of image interactivity technology and experimenting with appearance. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 28(2), 140-154. doi:10.1177/0887302X09341586
  17. Makortoff, K. (2015, Augest 20). Millennials: a generation to make or break retailers. CNBC. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/20/Millennials-a-generation-to-make-or-break-retailers.html
  18. McCorkindale, T., DiStaso, M., & Fussell Sisco, H. (2013). How Millennials are Engaging and Building Relationships with Organizations on Facebook. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2(1). Retrieved from http://thejsms.org/index.php/TSMRI/article/view/15
  19. McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296-315. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.296.76
  20. Morgan, B. M. (2003). Cooperative learning in higher education: Undergraduate student reflections on group examinations for group grades. College Student Journal, 37(1), 40-50.
  21. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420
  22. Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology and Marketing, 22(9), 695-719. doi:10.1002/mar.20080
  23. Patricia, S., Victor, P., & Stanley, W. (2005). Attitude and age differences in online buying. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 122-132. doi:10.1108/09590550510581458
  24. Rabjohn, N., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2008). Examining the perceived credibility of online opinions: information adoption in the online environment. Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual, Hawaii.
  25. Rosa, J. A., Garbarino, E. C., & Malter, A. J. (2006). Keeping the body in mind: The influence of body esteem and body boundary aberration on consumer beliefs and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 79-91. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_10
  26. Ruth, N. B., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Loureiro, Y. K., & Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 245-267. doi:10.1108/09564231311326987
  27. Schawbel, D. (2015, Jan 20). Ten new findings about the millennial consumer. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/danschawbel/2015/01/20/10-new-findings-about-the-millennialconsumer/#1f58ea5a28a8
  28. Shang, R.-A., Chen, Y.-C., & Liao, H.-J. (2006). The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyalty. Internet Research, 16(4), 398-418. doi:10.1108/10662240610690025
  29. Sher, P. J., & Lee, S.-H. (2009). Consumer skepticism and online reviews: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 37(1), 137-143. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.1.137
  30. Statista. (2016a). U.S. apparel and accessories retail e-commerce revenue 2013-2018 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/278890/us-apparel-and-accessories-retail-e-commerce-revenue/
  31. Statista. (2016b). Which product categories do Millennials shop online? [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/317804/us-Millennials--product-categories-purchased-online/
  32. Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2015). A study on the impact of consumer risk perception and innovativeness on online shopping in India. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(2), 148-166. doi:10.1108/IJRDM-06-2013-0128
  33. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario, Canada: University of Western Ontario.
  34. Wang, X., Yu, C., & Wei, Y. (2012). Social media peer communication and impacts on purchase intentions: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 198-208. doi:10.1016/j.intmar. 2011.11.004
  35. Wu, W. Y., & Ke, C. C. (2015). An online shopping behavior model integrating personality traits, perceived risk, and technology acceptance. Social Behavior & Personality: an international journal, 43(1), 85-97. doi:10.2224/sbp.2015.43.1.85
  36. Yu, U. J., Lee, H. H., & Damhorst, M. L. (2012). Exploring multidimensions of product performance risk in the online apparel shopping context: Visual, tactile, and trial risks. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(4), 251-266. doi:10.1177/0887302X12462059