DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Kinetic Degrees of Freedom of the Fingers on the Task Performance during Force Production and Release: Archery Shooting-like Action

  • Kim, Kitae (Department of Physical Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Xu, Dayuan (Department of Physical Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jaebum (Department of Physical Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2017.04.24
  • Accepted : 2017.06.08
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of changes in degrees of freedom of the fingers (i.e., the number of the fingers involved in tasks) on the task performance during force production and releasing task. Method: Eight right-handed young men (age: $29.63{\pm}3.02yr$, height: $1.73{\pm}0.04m$, weight: $70.25{\pm}9.05kg$) participated in this study. The subjects were required to press the transducers with three combinations of fingers, including the index-middle (IM), index-middle-ring (IMR), and index-middle-ring-little (IMRL). During the trials, they were instructed to maintain a steady-state level of both normal and tangential forces within the first 5 sec. After the first 5 sec, the subjects were instructed to release the fingers on the transducers as quickly as possible at a self-selected manner within the next 5 sec, resulting in zero force at the end. Customized MATLAB codes (MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) were written for data analysis. The following variables were quantified: 1) finger force sharing pattern, 2) root mean square error (RMSE) of force to the target force in three axes at the aiming phase, 3) the time duration of the release phase (release time), and 4) the accuracy and precision indexes of the virtual firing position. Results: The RMSE was decreased with the number of fingers increased in both normal and tangential forces at the steady-state phase. The precision index was smaller (more precise) in the IMR condition than in the IM condition, while no significant difference in the accuracy index was observed between the conditions. In addition, no significant difference in release time was found between the conditions. Conclusion: The study provides evidence that the increased number of fingers resulted in better error compensation at the aiming phase and performed a more constant shooting (i.e., smaller precision index). However, the increased number of fingers did not affect the release time, which may influence the consistency of terminal performance. Thus, the number of fingers led to positive results for the current task.

Keywords

References

  1. Arimoto, S., Tahara, K., Bae, J. H. & Yoshida, M. (2003). A stability theory of a manifold: concurrent realization of grasp and orientation control of an object by a pair of robot fingers. Robotica, 21, 163-178.
  2. Cheng, F. T. & Orin, D. E. (1991). Optimal Force Distribution in Multiple-Chain Robotic Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 21(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.101132
  3. Ertan, H., Kentel, B., Tümer, S. T. & Korkusuz, F. (2003). Activation patterns in forearm muscles during archery shooting. Human Movement Science, 22(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(02)00176-8
  4. Gelfand, I. M. & Tsetlin, M. (1966). On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. In I. M. Gelfand, V. S. Gurfinkel, S. V. Fomin & M. L. Tsetlin (Eds.), Models of the structuralfunctional organization of certain biological systems (pp. 9-26). Moscow (a translation is available in 1971 edition by MIT Press: Cambridge, MA): Nauka
  5. Hah, C. K. & Yi, J. H. (2008). Evaluation on Kinematic Factors Affecting Scores of Olympic Round Game during the Follow Through in Archery. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 18(1), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2008.18.1.227
  6. Kim, J. P. (2005). The correlation of the physical stability and the performance of archers in non-shooting and shooting. Korean Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 10(1), 152-152.
  7. Kim, J. P. (2008). The effect of balance exercise on postural control and shooting record in archers. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 18(2), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2008.18.2.065
  8. Kim, Y., Kim, W. S., Koh, K., Yoon, B., Damiano, D. L. & Shim, J. K. (2016). Deficits in motor abilities for multi-finger force control in hemiparetic stroke survivors. Experimental Brain Research, 234(8), 2391-2402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4644-2
  9. Koh, K., Kwon, H. J., Park, Y. S., Kiemel, T., Miller, R. H., Kim, Y. H., Shin, J. H. & Shim, J. K. (2016). Intra-Auditory Integration Improves Motor Performance and Synergy in an Accurate Multi-Finger Pressing Task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1-11.
  10. Latash, M. L. (2008). Synergy, Oxford University Press.
  11. Latash, M. L., Danion, F. J., Scholz, F., Zatsiorsky, V. M. & Schoner, G. (2003). Approaches to analysis of handwriting as a task of coordinating a redundant motor system. Human Movement Science, 22(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(02)00157-4
  12. Latash, M. L., Li, Z. M. & Zatsiorsky, V. M. (1998). A principle of error compensation studied within a task of force production by a redundant set of fingers. Experimental Brain Research, 122(2), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050500
  13. Latash, M. L., Scholz, J. F. Danion, F. & Schoner, G. (2001). Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 141(2), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210100861
  14. Latash, M. L., Shim, J. K. & Zatsiorsky, V. M. (2004). Is there a timing synergy during multi-finger production of quick force pulses?. Experimental Brain Research, 159(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1933-y
  15. Leroyer, P., Van Hoecke, J. & Helal, J. N. (1993). Biomechanical study of the final push-pull in archery. Journal of Sports Sciences, 11(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419308729965
  16. Li, Z. M., Latash, M. L. & Zatsiorsky, V. M. (1998). Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem. Experimental Brain Research, 119(3), 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050343
  17. Martin, P. E., Siler, W. L. & Hoffman, D. (1990). Electromyographic analysis of bow string release in highly skilled archers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8(3), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419008732147
  18. McKinney, W. & McKinney, M. (1997). Archery. brown & benchmark. Madison, WI.
  19. Nishizono, A., Shibayama, H., Izuta, T. & Saito, K. (1987). Analysis of archery shooting techniques by means of electromyography. International Society of Biomechanics in Sports. Proceedings, Symposium V, Athens, Greece.
  20. Olafsdottir, H., Yoshida, N., Zatsiorsky, V. M. & Latash, M. L. (2005). Anticipatory covariation of finger forces during self-paced and reaction time force production. Neuroscience Letters, 381(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.02.003
  21. Park, J., Jo, H. J., Lewis, M. M., Huang, X. & Latash, M. L. (2013). Effects of Parkinson’s disease on optimization and structure of variance in multi-finger tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 231(1), 51-63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3665-3
  22. Scholz, J. P., Danion, F. Latash, M. L. & Schoner, G. (2002). Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biological Cybernetics, 86(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004220100279
  23. Stuart, J. & Atha, J. (1990). Postal consistency in skilled archers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8, 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419008732148
  24. Xia, Y. S., Feng, G. & Wang, J. (2005). A primal-dual neural network for online resolving constrained kinematic redundancy in robot motion control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern, 35(1), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2004.839913